Advertisement

Protoplast, Cytoplast and Sub-Protoplast from Ripening Tomato Fruits: Their Nature and Fusion Properties

  • Deepesh N. De
  • D. Swain
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 22)

Abstract

Since the achievement of the fusion of heterotypic protoplasts to bring about somatic hybridization (1), the feasibility of using liposomes (2), vacuoplasts (3) and various types of vesicles (4) for chromosome or organelle transfer is being gradually appreciated. Such protoplast units may be variously produced by differential centrifugation (3) or by synthetic methods (5). The ripening fruits of tomato normally produce various types of protoplasts which may be equally useful (6). The present investigation is addressed to the structure and diversity of these protoplasmic units and their spontaneous and induced fusion properties. The staining reactions with vital basic and acidic dyes also reveal their potential use as marker or fusogen.

Keywords

Methylene Blue Somatic Hybridization Mesophyll Protoplast Fusion Frequency Spontaneous Fusion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P.S. Carlson, H.H. Smith and R.D. Dearing, Parasexual interspecific plant hybridization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69:2292–2294 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.B. Mukherjee, S. Orloff, J. Butter, B. De, T. Triche, P. Lalley and J.D. Schulman, Entrapment of metaphase chromosomes into phospholipid vesicles (lipochromosomes): carrier potential in gene transfer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75:1361–1365 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.H. Lorz, C.T. Harms and I. Potrykus, Isolation of “vacuoplasts” from protoplasts of higher plants, Biochem. Physiol. Pflanzen. 169S:617–620 (1976).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K.L. Giles, Uptake by plant protoplast, Abstract, 13th Intl. Bot. Congress, Sydney (1981).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E.D. Korn, ed., “Methods in Membrane Biology I,” Plenum Press, New York (1974).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.C. Cocking and D.W. Gregory, Organized protoplasmic units of plant cell: their occurrence, origin and structure, J. Exp. Bot. 14:504–511 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.B. Power and E.C. Cocking, Isolation of leaf protoplasts: macromolecule uptake and growth substance response, J. Exp. Bot. 21:64–70 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.N. Kao, A method for fusion of plant protoplasts with polyethylene glycol, in: “Plant Tissue Culture Methods,” O.L. Gamborg and L.R. Wetter, eds., National Research Council of Canada, Saskatoon (1975).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Nagata and I. Takebe, Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts, Planta 92:301–308 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.C. Maitra and D.N. De, Ultrastructure of root cap cells: formation and utilization of lipid, Cytobios 5:111–118 (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deepesh N. De
    • 1
  • D. Swain
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Botany SectionIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations