Eminent Domain, Inverse Condemnation, and Police Power
Eminent domain, inverse condemnation, and police power are three legal tenets by which the state can assert its dominion over private property for the public good. The state can, by exercising these powers, become involved in questions of water rights, mineral rights, and surface rights.
KeywordsPrivate Property United States Constitution Police Power Eminent Domain Fourteenth Amendment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Suggested Reading
- American Jurisprudence 2d (1966), Lawyers Co-Operative Publishing Co., Rochester, N.Y.; Bancroft-Whitney Co., San Francisco, Eminent Domain, Vol. 26, Secs. 1–246; Vol. 27, Secs. 247–507.Google Scholar
- Corker, C. (1974), Limits to the petty larceny of the police power, Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute, 20th Proceedings, pp. 67–90.Google Scholar
- Feder, H., and Wieland, C. (1974), Inverse condemnation—A viable alternative. Denver L. j., 51: 529–550.Google Scholar
- Happy, J. (1971), Damnum Absque Injuria: When Private Property May Be Damaged Without Compensation in Missouri, Missouri L. Rev., 36: 453–470.Google Scholar
- Leiter, I. (1974), Eminent Domain, Chicago-Kent L. R., 51: 645–655.Google Scholar
- Meidinger, E. (1980), The public uses of eminent domain: history and policy, Environmental Law 11: 1–67.Google Scholar
- Riser, L. (1979), Police Power, American Jurisprudence 2d, Lawyers Co-Operative Publishing Co., Rochester, N.Y.; Bancroft-Whitney Co., San Francisco, Co.stitutional Law, Part IX, Vol. 16A, Secs. 360–438.Google Scholar
- Roth, U. (1982), “To take or not to take, that is the question”–Acquisitions of mining and mine-related rights through eminent domain, Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute Proceedings 27: 739–786.Google Scholar
- Sutter, J., and Hecht, M. (1974), Landslide and Subsidence Liability, California Continuing Education of the Bar, Berkeley, Calif.Google Scholar