Advertisement

Lymphadenectomy in Renal Cancer

  • G. Carmignani
  • E. Belgrano
  • P. Puppo
  • C. Giberti
  • A. Cichero
Part of the NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 53)

Abstract

On the basis of the experience of the Urological University Clinic of Genoa (104 cases of renal cancer operated on in the last 10 years) the problems related to the rationale, the technique and the indications for retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in renal cancer are reviewed and discussed.

It is concluded that, although lymphadenectomy adds little morbidity and constitutes a fundamental part of radical nephrectomy performed through an anterior transperitoneal approach, no actual benefit can yet be demonstrated.

The generally accepted management of renal cancer is radical nephrectomy, which includes perifascial nephrectomy through an anterior transperitoneal approach, adrenalectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (1). However it is possible to question the benefits of lymphadenectomy, the technique and the extension of nodal dissection and the indications for nodal extirpation in high stage tumors. In this paper we shall discuss our experience at the Urological University Clinic of Genoa, based on 104 consecutive cases of renal cancer operated on during the last 10 years and we will attempt to define the role of lymphadenectomy in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

Keywords

Renal Cell Carcinoma Renal Cancer Radical Nephrectomy Renal Carcinoma Iliac Node 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. Giuliani, Le vie di accesso, in “Attuali Orientamenti nella Diagnosi e Terapia dei Carcinomi del Rene,” Atti SIU (1976).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Angervall, L. Wahlquist, Follow-up and prognosis of renal Carcinoma in a series operated by perifascial nephrectomy combined with adrenalectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy, Eur. Urol. 4:13 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.B. deKernion, Lymphadenectomy for renal cell carcinoma: therapeutic implications, Urol. Clin. N. Am. 7:697 (1980).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.C. Peters, and G.L. Brown, The role of lymphadenectomy in the management of renal cell carcinoma, Urol. Clin. N. Am. 7:705 (1980).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.G. Skinner, C.D. Vermillion and R.B. Colvin, The surgical management of renal carcinoma, J. Urol. 107:705 (1972).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.J. Robson, B.M. Churchill and W. Andersson, The results of radical nephrectomy for renal carcinoma, J. Urol. 101:297 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Rocca Rossetti, La linfadenectomia, in “Attuali Orientamenti nella Diagnosi e Terapia dei Carcinomi del Rene, Atti SUI (1976).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.O. Klugo, M. Detmers, R.E. Stiles, R.W. Talley and J.C. Cerny, Aggressive versus conservative management of stage IV renal cell carcinoma, J. Urol. 118:244 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Carmignani
    • 1
  • E. Belgrano
    • 1
  • P. Puppo
    • 1
  • C. Giberti
    • 1
  • A. Cichero
    • 1
  1. 1.Urological University ClinicGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations