The Self, the Third, and Desire

  • Vincent Crapanzano
Part of the Path in Psychology book series (PATH)


“The fact that the dreamer’s own ego appears several times, or in several forms, in a dream”, Freud wrote in his 1925 revision of The Interpretation of Dreams (1954 ed., p. 12), “is at bottom no more remarkable than that the ego should be contained in a conscious thought several times or in different places or connections—e.g., in the sentence ‘when I think what a healthy child I was.’”[1] Freud was referring to the various representations the dreamer’s ego can take in a dream. Implicit in his rather unwieldy sentence is a “psychology” that is neither immediately nor necessarily associated with his explicit psychology. [2] This implicit psychology serves as the ground for his thought. It serves, too, I suggest, as the ground for my own contribution, and the other contributions, to this volume.


Conscious Thought Symbolic Order Dual Relationship Triadic Relationship Dialectical Movement 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aristotle. “De Interpretatione”. In The Basic Writings of Aristotle (ed. by Richard McKeon, New York: Random House, 1941 ), pp. 40–61.Google Scholar
  2. Benveniste, E.: 1966. Problèmes de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  3. Benveniste, E.: 1971 Trans. Problems in General Linguistics. Miami Linguistic Series No. 8 Coral Gables: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P.L., Luckmann, T.: 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  5. Burckhardt, J.: 1867. Die Kultur der Renaissance in Italien. 1926 ed., Leipzig: Alfred Kroner.Google Scholar
  6. Burckhardt, J.: 1955 Trans.: The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy, London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
  7. Crapanzano, V.: 1975. “Saints, Jnun, and Dreams: An Essay in Moroccan Ethnopsychiatry”. Psychiatry, XXXVIII: 145–159.Google Scholar
  8. Crapanzano, V.: 1977. Introduction to Case Studies in Spirit Possession (ed. by V. Crapanzano and V. Garrison, New York: John Wiley ), pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
  9. Crapanzano, V.: 1978. “Lacan’s Ecrits”. Canto, 11: 183–91.Google Scholar
  10. Crapanzano, V.: 1979. Introduction to Do Kamo (by M. Leenhardt, Chicago: University of Chicago Press) pp. vii–xxix.Google Scholar
  11. Crapanzano, V.: 1980. Tuhami. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dieterlin, G.: 1973. La Notion de Personne en Afrique Noire. Paris: Editions: C.N.R.S.Google Scholar
  13. Dupre, W.: 1975. Religion in Primitive Cultures: A Study in Ethnophilosophy. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Durkheim, E.: (1914). “The Dualism in Human Nature”. In Essays on Sociology and Philosophy (ed. by K. Wolff, New York: Harper and Row, 1964 ) pp. 325–340.Google Scholar
  15. Durkheim, E.: (1915) 1965 Trans.: The Elementary Form of the Religious Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Durkheim, E., Mauss, I.: (1903) 1963 Trans.: Primitive Classification Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M.: 1966. Les Mots et Les Choses. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  18. Freud, S.: ( 1925, rev. of 1900). “Traumdeutung”. In Gesammelte Werke 2/3. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1942.Google Scholar
  19. Freud, S.: 1954 Trans.: The Interpretation of Dreams. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  20. Halliday, M.A.K., Hasan, R.: 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  21. Hallowell, A.I.: 1967. “The Self and Its Behavioral Environment”. In Culture and Experience ( New York: Schocken ) pp. 75–110.Google Scholar
  22. Hegel, B.W.F.: 1931. The Phenomenology of the Mind. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  23. James, W.: (1890). The Principles of Psychology, I. 1950 ed., New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  24. Lacan, J.: 1966. Ecrits. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  25. Lamprecht, K.: 1900. Die Kulturhistorische Methode. Berlin: Gaertner.Google Scholar
  26. Leenhardt, M.: 1953. “Quelques elements communs aux forms inférieures de la religion” Histoire des Religion. 1: 83–110.Google Scholar
  27. Leenhardt, M.: 1979. Do Kamo: Person and Myth in the Melanesian World. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. MacLeod, R.B.: 1947. “The Phenomenological Approach to Social Psychology”. Psychological Review, LIV: 193–210.Google Scholar
  29. Mauss, M.: 1973. Sociologie et Anthropologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  30. Mead, G.H.: 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Peirce, C.S.: (1931). “Principles of Philosophy”. In Collected Papers of C.S. Pierce, I. (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1974 ) pp. 3–363.Google Scholar
  32. Sartre, J.P.: 1945. Huit Clos (Eng. No Exit) Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  33. Silverstein, M.: 1979. “Language, Structure, and Linguistic Ideology”. In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels (ed. by Paul R. Klyne etal., Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society ), pp. 193–247.Google Scholar
  34. Steegmuller, F.: 1972. Flaubert in Egypt. London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
  35. Strachey, J.: 1961. Editor’s Introduction to “The Ego and the Id”. In S. Freud, Standard Edition, Vol. XIX ( London: Hogarth ) pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
  36. Strawson, P.F.: 1959 Individuals. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weintraub, K.J.: 1966. Visions of Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wilden, A.: 1968. Language of the Self. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wittgenstein, L.: 1978. Philosophical Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent Crapanzano
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Queens CollegeUSA
  2. 2.Graduate Center of the City of New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations