Initiation of Experimental Liver Carcinogenesis by Chemicals: Are the Carcinogen Altered Hepatocytes Stimulated to Grow into Foci by Different Selection Procedures Identical?

  • A. Columbano
  • G. M. Ledda
  • P. M. Rao
  • S. Rajalakshmi
  • D. S. R. Sarma
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 52)


The multi-stage nature of the carcinogenic process has been demonstrated in many tissues including skin (1–3), liver (4, 5), mammary gland (6), urinary bladder (7) and vagina (8). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this complex process are not yet understood clearly. The development of several experimental model systems for the sequential analysis of chemical carcinogenesis in rat liver has opened up new avenues for investigating this complex process. Our experimental approaches have two main objectives (i) to understand the mechanisms underlying the initiation phase of liver carcinogenesis and (ii) to characterize the initiated hepatocytes stimulated to grow into enzyme altered foci by some of the selection procedures. The experimental design was guided by the hypothesis shown in Figure 1.


Selection Regimen Orotic Acid Chemical Carcinogenesis Positive Focus Liver Carcinogenesis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. Rous and J.G. Kidd, Conditional neoplasms and subthreshold neoplastic states. J.Exp.Med. 73: 365 (1941).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Berenblum, and P. Shubik, The persistence of latent tumour cells induced by a single application of 9, 10-dimethyl-1, 2benzanthracene. Brit. J. Cancer 3: 384 (1949).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T.J. Slaga, A. Sivak, and R. K. Boutwell, eds., Carcinogenesis. Vol. 2. Mechanisms of Tumour Promotion and Cocarcinogenesis. Raven Press, New York (1978).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Peraino, E.F. Staffeldt, D.A. Haugen, L.S. Lombard, F. J. Stevens, and R.J.M. Fry, Effects of varying the dietary concentration of phenobarbital on its enhancement of 2-acetylaminofluorene-induced hepatic tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 40: 3268 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Farber, The sequential analysis of liver cancer induction. Biochim. Biophys.Acta 605: 149 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Medina, Preneoplastic lesions in murine mammary cancer. Cancer Res. 36: 2589 (1976).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.M. Hics, and J. Chowaniec, Experimental induction, histology and ultrastructure of hyperplasia and neoplasia of the urinary bladder epithelium. Int. Rev. Exp. Pathol. 18: 199 (1968).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.L. Herbst, H. Ulfelder, and D.C. Poskanzer, Adenocarc inoma of the vagina. Association of maternal stilbestrol therapy with tumour appearance to young women. New Engl.J.Med. 284: 878 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D.B. Solt, and E. Farber, New principle for analysis of chemical carcinogenesis. Nature 263: 701 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Peraino, R.J.M. Fry and E.F. Staffeldt, Reduction and enhance- ment by phenobarbital of hepatocarcinogenesis induced in the rat by 2-acetylaminofluorene. Cancer Res. 31: 1506 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. B. Solt, A. Medline, and E. Farber, Rapid emergence of carcino- gen-induced hyperplastic lesions in a new model for the sequential analysis of liver carcinogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 88: 595 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Farber and R. Cameron, The sequential analysis of cancer development. Adv.Cancer Res. 31: 125 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Ogawa, D. B. Solt and E. Farber, Phenotypic diversity as an early property of putative preneoplastic hepatocyte populations in liver carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 40: 725 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Columbano, S. Rajalakshmi, and D.S.R. Sarma, Requirement of cell proliferation for the initiation of liver carcinogenesis as assayed by three different procedures. Cancer Res. 41: 2079 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T.S. Ying, D.S.R. Sarma, and E. Farber, Role of acute hepatic necrosis in the induction of early steps in liver carcinogenesis by diethylnitrosamine. Cancer Res. 41: 2096 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T.S. Ying, The role of DNA synthesis and of repair in the induc- tion of putative preneoplastic lesions in rat liver by 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine (1, 2-DMH). Proc.Am.Assoc.Cancer Res. 21: 62 (1980).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Boreck, and L. Sachs, The number of cell generations required to fix the transformed state in X-ray involved transformation. Proc. Natl.Acad.Sci. (U.S.A.) 57: 1522 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Kakunaga, Requirement for cell proliferation in the fixation and expression of the transformed state in mouse cells treated with 4-nitroquinoline-l-oxide. Int.J.Cancer 14: 736 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G.J. Todaro and H. Green, Cell growth and the initiation of transformation by SV40. Proc. Natl.Acad.Sci. (U.S.A.) 55: 302 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S.E. Abanobi, A. Columbano, R.A. Mulivor, S. Rajalakshmi, and D.S.R. Sarma, In vivo replication of hepatic deoxyribonucleic acid of rats treatededwithi d imethyl nitrosam ine: presence of dimethylnitrosamine-induced 06-methylguanine, N-7-methylguanine, and N-3-methyladenine in the replicated hybrid deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry 19: 1382 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    G.M. Ledda, A. Columbano, P.M. Rao, S. Rajalakshmi, and D.S.R. Sarma, In vivo replication of carcinogen-modified rat liver DNA: Increased susceptibility of 06-methylguanine compared to N-7-methylguanine in replicated DNA to S1-nuclease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 95: 816 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Cayama, H. Tsuda, D.S.R. Sarma, and E. Farber, Initiation of chemical carcinogenesis requires cell proliferation. Nature 275: 60 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    N. Ito, M. Tatematsu, M. Hirose, K. Nakanishi, and J. Muraski, Enhancing effect of chemicals on production of hyperplastic liver nodules induced by N-2-fluorenylacetamine in hepatectomized rat. Gann 69: 143 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    N.T. Kimura, T. Kanematsu, and T. Baba, Polychlorinated biphenyl(s)as a promoter in experimental hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. Z. Krebsförsch 87: 257 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M.A. Sells, S.L. Katyal, S. Sell, H. Sinozuka and B. Lombardi, Induction of foci of altered y-glutamyltranspeptidase-positive hepatocytes in carcinogen-treated rats fed a choline-deficient diet. Br. J. Cancer 40: 274 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    D.B. Solt, E. Cayama, D.S.R. Sarma, and E. Farber, Persistence of resistant putative preneoplastic hepatocytes induced by Nnitrosodiethylamine or N-methyl-N-nitrosourea. Cancer Res. 40: 1112 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J.C. Mottram, A developing factor in experimental blastogenesis. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 56: 181 (1944).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Columbano
    • 1
  • G. M. Ledda
    • 1
  • P. M. Rao
    • 1
  • S. Rajalakshmi
    • 1
  • D. S. R. Sarma
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PathologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations