Preparation and Properties of WC-(Ni, Al) Cemented Carbides

  • R. K. Viswanadham
  • P. G. Lindquist
  • J. A. Peck


WC-Ni cermets are inferior to WC-Co when measured by their hardness-fracture toughness combination. To enhance system performance, an attempt was made to strengthen the binder in WC-Ni by alloying with Al to produce controlled dispersions of γ′ (Ni3Al) in the binder.

WC-(Ni, Al) cermets with 4 to 12 wt. % Al in the binder were produced by powder metallurgy techniques, liquid phase sintered and hot isostatically pressed. X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy were used to characterize the amount, size and distribution of γ′ in the binder. The volume fraction of γ′ in the binder as measured by X-ray diffraction agreed well with values calculated using available phase diagram data. Dark field TEM studies showed that both cuboidal and heterogeneous γ′ were present in the binder in the as-sintered condition. The size of γ′ varied from 100 to 2000 A. The WC-(Ni, Al) cermets were then solution treated by vacuum heating and quenching in oil. They were then aged in vacuum at different temperatures and times to produce γ′ of controlled size and distribution. Since all these heat treatments were carried out in the solid state, microstructural factors such as carbide fraction, size and contiguity remained unchanged. In this respect, WC-(Ni, Al) cermets provided a model system where only the binder constitution was altered.

Hardness and fracture toughness comparisons of WC-(Ni, Al) in the various heat treated conditions revealed that conventional wisdom regarding strengthening mechanisms in bulk alloys is not directly translatable to binders in cermets, and that the applicability and effectiveness of each strengthening mechanism differs considerably from bulk alloys.


Fracture Toughness Solution Treatment Crack Resistance Strengthening Mechanism Bulk Alloy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. Roebuck and E.A. Almond, “A Comparison of the Deformation Characteristics of Co and Ni Alloys Containing Small Amounts of W and C”, Proc. 10th Plansee Seminar, 1:493 (1981).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.T. Sims and W.C. Hagel, “The Superalloys,” Wiley-Interscience, Newyork (1972).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Jonsson, Studies of the Binder Phase in WC-Co Cemented Carbides Heat-Treated at 650°C, Powder Metallurgy, 15(29):1 (1972).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Taylor and R.W. Floyd, The Constitution of Nickel-Rich Alloys of the Nickel-Aluminium-Titanium System, J. Inst. Metals, 81:25 (1952).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.K. Viswanadham and J.D. Venables, “A Simple Method for Evaluating Cemented Carbides, Met. Trans. A, 8A:187 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.K. Viswanadham and W. Precht, “Preparation and Properties of VC-Ni Cermets with Controlled Carbon-to-Metal Ratio, Met. Trans. A, 11A:1475 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.J. Ardell, R.B. Nicholson and J.D. Eshelby, “On the Modulated Structure of Aged Ni-Al Alloys, Acta Met., 14:1295 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. K. Viswanadham
    • 1
  • P. G. Lindquist
    • 1
  • J. A. Peck
    • 1
  1. 1.Materials ResearchReed Rock Bit Co.HoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations