Response of a WC-Co Alloy to Thermal Shock

  • C. W. Merten


WC-6%Co specimens were subjected to thermal shock treatments by means of induction heating and subsequent controlled quenching to determine their resistance to fracture. Resistance to fracture is correlated to the thermal amplitude required to produce cracking. Typical thermal amplitudes ranged from 500° to 1200° C. Specimens with a thickness of 2.3 mm. required higher thermal amplitudes for failure than did specimens of twice this thickness. The fracture surfaces of thin specimens are perpendicular to the surface of largest area indicating that a plane stress situation exists. Fracture surfaces of 4.6 mm. thick specimens deviate from this condition. Scanning electron micrographs show that the fracture path has proceeded through both the Co matrix and the WC grains. The ability of thermal shock testing to discriminate between surface treatments was also investigated. Surface treatment was found to influence the thermal amplitude required for fracture. The applicability of thermal shock test results to actual cutting conditions is discussed, and, in light of these results, recommendations as to tool design are given.


Fracture Surface Thermal Shock Central Plane Fracture Surface Morphology Grit Blasting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. A. Betser and J. Gurland, Some Effects of Temperature and Heat Treatment on the Strength of Sintered WC-Co Alloys, ASME Pap. 66-MD-17 (1966).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. S. Kreimer, “Strength of Hard Alloys,” Consultants Bureau, New York (1968).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Okushima and T. Hoshi, Thermal Crack in the Carbide Face-Milling Cutter-I, Bull. JSME. 6:151–160 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Okushima and T. Hoshi, Thermal Crack in the Carbide Face-Milling Cutter-II, Bull. JSME. 6:317–326 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. M. Bhatia, P. C. Pandey, and H. S. Shan, Effect of Thermo-Mechanical Shocks on the Functioning of Cemented Carbide Tools in Intermittent Cutting, Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res. 19:195–204 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. M. Braiden and D. S. Dugdale, Failure of Carbide Tools in Intermittent Cutting, in: “Materials for Metal Cutting,” I.S.I., London (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Wu and J. E. Mayer, Jr., An Analysis of Thermal Cracking of Carbide Tools in Intermittent Cutting, ASME. Pap.7S-WA/PR0D-22:1–6 (1978).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Larsen-Basse, Wear of Hard-Metals in Rock Drilling: A Survey of the Literature, Powder Metallurgy. 16:1–32 (1973).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. G. Bailey and C. M. Perrott, Wear Processes Exhibited by WC-Co Rotary Cutters in Mining, Wear. 29:117–128 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. G. Stjernberg, U. Fischer, and N. I. Hugoson, Wear Mechanisms Due to Different Rock Drilling Conditions, Powder Metallurgy. 18:89–106 (1975).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.J. Osburn, Wear of Rock-Cutting Tools, Powder Metallurgy. 12:471–502 (1969).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. P. H. Hasselman, Unified Theory of Thermal Shock Fracture Initiation and Crack Propagation in Brittle Ceramics, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 52:600–604 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y. W. Mai and A. G. Atkins, Fracture Strength Behavior of Tool Carbides Subjected to Thermal Shock, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 54:593 (1975).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. W. Mai, On the Thermal Shock Behaviour of Oxide Ceramic and Carbide Cutting Tools, in: “Fracture Mechanics and Technology,” G. C. Sih and C. L. Chow, eds., Sijthoff and Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn (1977).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. D. McCabe, The Effect of Microstructure on the Erosion of Tungsten Carbide-Cobalt Alloys, M. S. Thesis, U. of Ky., Lexington (1980).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Kamel and K. Halim, The Effect of Phase Change on the Mechanical Properties of Cobalt Near Its Transformation Temperature, Phys. Stat. Sol. 15:63–69 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Gurland and J. T. Norton, Role of the Binder Phase in Cemented Tungsten Carbide-Cobalt Alloys, J. of Metals. 4:1051–1056 (1952).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. W. Merten
    • 1
  1. 1.Multi-Metals Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe University of VermontUSA

Personalised recommendations