Fracture Toughness as an Aid to Alloy Development

  • Tom McLaren
  • John B. Lambert


With the portent of raw material shortages for the manufacture of conventional WC-Co cutting tool materials, a study to develop new materials for the hard metal industry was undertaken. Fracture toughness testing, employing short-rod fracture toughness samples on a Fractometer*, was a valuable tool for alloy screening. In this study four material matrices were examined:
  1. (1)

    WC-Co alloys

  2. (2)

    Steel-cutting cemented carbides

  3. (3)

    (Ti, Mo) C-Ni compositions

  4. (4)

    Composite Al2O3-TiC ceramics

Compositional and microstructural variations were introduced to find, first, the effect on mechanical properties, including fracture toughness, and, second, the effect on application and tool performance. Although fracture toughness helped rank material candidates within a system as to relative impact resistance, tool life is dependent also on other factors, such as hardness and oxidation resistance.


Fracture Toughness Flank Wear Cobalt Content Hard Metal Cement Carbide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    U. Engel, and H. Hubner, Strength Improvement of Cemented Carbides by Hot Isostatic Pressing, J. Mat. Sci. 13:2003 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. M. Barker, A Simplified Method for Measuring Plane Strain Fracture Toughness, Eng. Frac. Mech. 9:361 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Farb, Fracture Toughness of Cobalt Cemented Tungsten Carbides, M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Utah (1978).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. M. Barker, Residual Stress Effects on Fracture Toughness Measurements, International Conf. on Fracture, ICF5, Cannes, France (1981).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Kieffer, P. Ettmayer, and M. Frendbofmier, in: “Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy,” 5:201 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Rudy, Journal of the Less-Common Metals 70:33 (1973).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Asai, T. Nomura, T. Yamamoto, and A. Hara, The Performance of a New Cermet Cutting Tool, Bull. Jap. Soc. of Proc. Eng. 12, No. 1:47 (1978).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. P. Moskowitz, M. Humenik, Jr., Effect of Binder Phase on the Properties of TiC-22.5Ni-MoCx Tool Materials, Int. Jour. of Pow. Met. and Pow. Tech. 14, No. 1:39 (1978).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Snell, Planseeber. Pulvermetallurgie 22:91 (1974).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. F. Van der Voort and R. Hinton, Metallographic Study of Factors Influencing the Toughness of 70% Al203/30% TiC Cermet Inserts, Proceedings of 1979 Conference of Productivity Improvement Through New Tools and Applications, Chicago, I11., 153–158 (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom McLaren
    • 1
  • John B. Lambert
    • 2
  1. 1.VR/Wesson DivisionFansteel Inc.WaukeganUSA
  2. 2.Fansteel Inc.North ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations