Fracture Toughness as an Aid to Alloy Development
With the portent of raw material shortages for the manufacture of conventional WC-Co cutting tool materials, a study to develop new materials for the hard metal industry was undertaken. Fracture toughness testing, employing short-rod fracture toughness samples on a Fractometer*, was a valuable tool for alloy screening. In this study four material matrices were examined:
Compositional and microstructural variations were introduced to find, first, the effect on mechanical properties, including fracture toughness, and, second, the effect on application and tool performance. Although fracture toughness helped rank material candidates within a system as to relative impact resistance, tool life is dependent also on other factors, such as hardness and oxidation resistance.
Steel-cutting cemented carbides
(Ti, Mo) C-Ni compositions
Composite Al2O3-TiC ceramics
KeywordsFracture Toughness Flank Wear Cobalt Content Hard Metal Cement Carbide
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.J. Farb, Fracture Toughness of Cobalt Cemented Tungsten Carbides, M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Utah (1978).Google Scholar
- 4.L. M. Barker, Residual Stress Effects on Fracture Toughness Measurements, International Conf. on Fracture, ICF5, Cannes, France (1981).Google Scholar
- 6.E. Rudy, Journal of the Less-Common Metals 70:33 (1973).Google Scholar
- 7.T. Asai, T. Nomura, T. Yamamoto, and A. Hara, The Performance of a New Cermet Cutting Tool, Bull. Jap. Soc. of Proc. Eng. 12, No. 1:47 (1978).Google Scholar
- 8.P. P. Moskowitz, M. Humenik, Jr., Effect of Binder Phase on the Properties of TiC-22.5Ni-MoCx Tool Materials, Int. Jour. of Pow. Met. and Pow. Tech. 14, No. 1:39 (1978).Google Scholar
- 9.P. Snell, Planseeber. Pulvermetallurgie 22:91 (1974).Google Scholar
- 10.G. F. Van der Voort and R. Hinton, Metallographic Study of Factors Influencing the Toughness of 70% Al203/30% TiC Cermet Inserts, Proceedings of 1979 Conference of Productivity Improvement Through New Tools and Applications, Chicago, I11., 153–158 (1979).Google Scholar
© Plenum Press, New York 1983