Advertisement

Some Aspects of the Fracture of WC-Co Composites

  • Frédéric Osterstock
  • Jean-Louis Chermant

Abstract

During the last decade, fracture mechanics measurements on cemented carbides became of current use. Critical stress intensity factor values obtained in different laboratories with different specimen geometries show good agreement for similar batches (1) (2) (3) (4) (5). By this way it appeared that tungsten-carbide is rather tough if compared to other carbides (6) (7). Furthermore, this toughness can be increased by cobalt additions. Combination of critical stress intensity factor and rupture stress, mostly obtained in bending, allows one to evaluate the size of the critical defect, ac, i.e. the size of the initiating defect at the moment where crack propagation becomes catastrophic. The calculated values of ac are low compared to other carbides or single phased ceramics (7). This arises from liquid-phase sintering, however it shows clearly that mechanical strength of cemented carbide may be affected by very small defects like porosity or carbide crystal bundles... Influence of structural heterogeneities was already evidenced by S.B. Luyckx (8) when she noted that fracture origin is generally associated with the presence of impurities or inclusions. The statistical analysis of rupture made by P. Anderson (9) gave the same conclusion. H. Suzuki and K. Hayashi (10) made fractographic analyses of broken specimens, located the initiating defect and measured the size.

Keywords

Stress Intensity Factor Cobalt Content Rupture Stress Binder Content Critical Stress Intensity Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. S. Yen, Thesis of Master of Science, Lehigh University, USA, (1971).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. C. Lueth, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, USA, (1972).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Ingelstrom and H. Nordberg, Eng. Fract. Mech. 6:597 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Hubner, Z. Metallkde. 67:507 (1976).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Osterstock, These de Docteur Ingenieur, University of Caen, France (1975).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. L. Chermant, A. Deschanvres, and A. lost, “Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics,” R. C. Bradt, D.P.H. Hasselman, F. F. Lange, eds., Plenum Press 1:347 (1974).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Moussa, These de 3e Cycle, University of Caen, France, (1981).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. B. Luyckx, Acta Met. 23:109 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. P. Anderson, Planseeb. Pulverment. 15:180 (1967).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Suzuki and K. Hayashi, Planseeb. Pulvermet, 23:24 (1975).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. A. Almond, Metal. Sci. 12:587 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Roebuck, J. Mat. Sci. 14:2837 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    U. Engel and H. Hubner, J. Mat. Sci. 13:2003 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. L. Chermant and F. Osterstock, J. Mat. Sci. 11:1939 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. L. Chermant, A. Deschanvres, and F. Osterstock, Povd. Met. 2:63 (1977).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. V. Virkar and R. S. Gordon J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 59:68 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Kenny, Powd. Met. 14:22 (1971).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Doi, and F. Ueda, in “Grain Boundaries in Engineering Materials,” Proc. 4th Bolton Landing Conf., June 1974, J. L. Water, J. H. Westbrook, D. A. Woodford, eds., Claitov’s Pub. (1975).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. W. Mai and A. G. Atkins, J. Mat. Sci. 10:1904 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Berry, on “New Tool Materials and Cutting Techniques,” London, April 25. 1975, Session I, paper 4.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. C. Lee, J. Pickens, and J. Gurland, VIII Workshop on Hard Materials, NSF, Baltimore, MA., June 1976.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. Dawihl, Arch. Eisenhuttenves. 45:729 (1974).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. Blumenauer, W. Bohlke, W. Flurschutz, R. Kohlermann, “5th Int. Powder Metallurgy Conference,” Dresden, October 23-25, 1975Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Gurland, Jernkont. Ann. 1:147 (1963).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Gurland, Trans. AIME 227:1146 (1963).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. F. Pabst, Z. Werkstofftechnik 6:17 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Nakamura and J. Gurland, Meall. Trans. 11A:141 (1980).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. J. Murray and C. M. Perrot, “Proceedings of the 1976 Int. Conf. on Hard Materials Tool Technology,” Carnegie Mellon Inst., June 22-24, 1976.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. W. Davidge, in “Mechanical Behaviour of Ceramics,” University Press, Cambridge (1979).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    P. M. Braiden, R. W. Davidge, and R. Airey, J. Mech Phys. Solids 25:257 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. Hagege, Thesis, University of Caen, France (July 1979).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    F. Osterstock, Thesis, University of Caen, France, (December 1980).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    F. Osterstock, in “Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics,” IIIIrd Symposium held at Penn State University, July 15-17, 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frédéric Osterstock
    • 1
  • Jean-Louis Chermant
    • 1
  1. 1.Equipe Matériaux Microstructure, Laboratoire de Cristallographie et Chimie du Solide, L.A. 251ISMRA-UniversitéCaen CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations