Decision Making by Children

Psychological Risks and Benefits
  • Gary B. Melton
Part of the Critical Issues in Social Justice book series (CISJ)


As noted throughout this volume, the concept of competence to consent has obvious psychological dimensions. Psychologists presumably can inform the law (or at least potentially can inform the law) about children’s capacity to weigh risks and benefits and to make “mature” decisions in various situations. Underlying the reason why there is interest in such developmental research are other less frequently discussed psychological concerns, which are the subject of this chapter. Specifically, a primary justification for denying children the power of consent is that they will be harmed by the consequences of making bad decisions.2. According to such a theory, self-determination rights are denied incompetent minors because of the state’s duty as parens patriae to protect dependent persons from harm.3 Hence, competence becomes an issue as a corollary to the assumption of harm, including psychological harm, resulting from allowing minors to make decisions if they are incompetent to do so. It is not incompetence per se that laws restricting children’s power of consent are designed to avoid. Rather, the purpose is to enhance children’s welfare or at least to minimize harm.


Moral Development Civil Liberty Apply Behavior Analysis Parental Authority Fourteenth Amendment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Annas, G. Law and the life sciences: Parents, children, & the Supreme Court. Hastings Center Report, October 1979, 9, 21–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Benedek, R. B., & Benedek, E. P. The child’s preference in custody disputes. American Journal of Family Therapy, 1979, 7 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brehm, J. W. Post-decision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956, 52, 384–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brehm, J. W. A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. Brehm, S. S. The effect of adult influence on children’s preferences: Compliance versus opposition. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1977, 5, 31–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brehm, S. S., & Weinraub, M. Physical barriers and psychological reactance: 2-year-old’s responses to threats to freedom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 830–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brigham, T. A. Some effects of choice on academic performance. In L. C. Perlmuter and R. A. Monty (Eds.), Choice and perceived control. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. Cogbill, J. V. III. Outpatient mental health services: A minor’s right. University of Richmond Law Review, 1979, 13, 915–926.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. deCharms, R. Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  10. deCharms, R. Enhancing motivation: Change in the classroom. New York: Irvington, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. deCharms, R. Personal causation and perceived control. In L. C. Perlmuter and R. A. Monty (Eds.), Choice and perceived control. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  12. Derdeyn, A. P., & Wadlington, W. J., III. Adoption: The rights of parents versus the best interests of their children. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1977, 16, 238–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dibner, A. S. Ambiguity and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958, 56, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feshbach, N. D., & Feshbach, S. Child advocacy and family privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 1978, 34 (2), 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fixsen, D. L., Phillips, E. L., & Wolf, M. M. Achievement place: Experiments in self-government with delinquents. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1973, 6, 31–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garbarino, J. The price of privacy: An analysis of the social dynamics of child abuse. Child Welfare, 1977, 56, 565–575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Garbarino, J., & Bronfenbrenner, U. The socialization of moral judgment and behavior in cross- cultural perspective. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, & social issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976.Google Scholar
  18. Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. S. Before the best interests of the child. New York: Free Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  19. Grisso, T., & Pomicter, C. Interrogation of juveniles. An empirical study of procedures, safeguards, & rights waiver. Law and Human Behavior, 1977, 1, 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Havelock, R. G. Planning for innovation through dissemination and utilization of knowledge. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Center for Research on Utilization of Knowledge, Institute for Social Research, 1969.Google Scholar
  21. Holmes, D. S., & Urie, R. G. Effects of preparing children for psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975, 43, 311–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keith-Spiegel, P. Children’s rights as participants in reseach. In G. P. Koocher (Ed.), Children’s rights and the mental health professions. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  23. Koenigs, S. S., Fiedler, M. L., & deCharms, R. Teacher beliefs, classroom interaction, & personal causation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1977, 7, 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kohlberg, L. Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, & social issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976.Google Scholar
  25. Lacey, H. M. Control, perceived control, & the methodological role of cognitive constructs. In L. C. Perlmuter and R. A. Monty (Eds.), Choice and perceived control. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  26. Laufer, R. S., & Wolfe, M. Privacy as a concept and a social issue: A multidimensional develop-mental theory. Journal of Social Issues, 1977, 12 (3), 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lefcourt, H. M. Locus of control. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976.Google Scholar
  28. Levin, H. A., & Askin, F. Privacy in the courts: Law and social reality. Journal of Social Issues, 1978, 33 (3), 138–1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levine, F. J., & Tapp, J. L. J. Levine (Eds.), Law, justice, & the individual in society. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1977.Google Scholar
  30. Lewis, C. E., Lewis, M. A., Lorimer, A., & Palmer, P. P. Child-initiated care: The use of school nursing services by children in an “adult-free” system. Pediatrics, 1977, 60, 499–507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mahoney, M. H., & Thoreson, C. E. Self-control: Power to the person. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1974.Google Scholar
  32. Meichenbaum, D. Cognitive-behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  33. Melton, G. B. Children’s right to treatment. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1978, 7, 200–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Melton, G. B. Children’s concepts of their rights. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1980, 9 186–190. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Melton, G. B. Psychological effects: Increased autonomy on children. Educational Perspectives, 1980, 19(4), 10–14. (b)Google Scholar
  36. Melton, G. B. Children’s participation in treatment planning: Psychological legal issues. Professinal Psychology, 1981, 12, 246–252. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Melton, G. B. Effects of a state law permitting minors to consent to psychotherapy. Professional Psychology, 1981, 12, 647–654. (b)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Melton, G. B. Teaching children about their rights. In J. S. Henning (Ed.), The rights of children: Legal and psychological perspectives. Springfield, 111.: Charles C Thomas, 1982.Google Scholar
  39. Melton, G. B. Children’s rights: Where are the children? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1982, 52, 530–538.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Melton, G. B. Child advocacy: Psychological issues and interventions. New York: Plenum Press, in press.Google Scholar
  41. Melton, G. B., & Lind, E. A. Procedural justice in family court: Does the adversary model make sense? In G. B. Melton (Ed.), Legal reforms affecting child and youth services. New York: Haworth, 1982.Google Scholar
  42. Note. Legal knowledge of Michigan citizens. Michigan Law Review, 1973, 71, 1463–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parke, R. D., & Swann, D. B. Children’s privacy in the home: Developmental, ecological and child-rearing determinants. Environment and Behavior, 1979, 11, 84–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Perlmuter, L. C., & Monty, R. A. Choice and perceived control. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  45. Phillips, E. L., Phillips, E. A., Wolf, M. M., & Fixsen, D. L. Achievement place: development of the elected manager sytem. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973, 6, 541–561.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piaget, J. The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press, 1965. (Originally published, 1932.)Google Scholar
  47. Prothro, J. W., & Grigg, C. W. Fundamental principles of democracy: Bases of agreement and disagreement. Journal of Politics, 1969, 276–294.Google Scholar
  48. Rosen, C. E. The impact of an Open Campus program upon high school student’s sense of control over their environment. Psychology in the Schools, 1977, 14, 216–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rotter, J. B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 1966, 80 (1, Whole No. 609).Google Scholar
  50. Seligman, M. E. P. Helpnessness: On depression, development, & death. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.Google Scholar
  51. Selman, R. L. Social-cognitive understanding: A guide to educational and clinical practice. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976.Google Scholar
  52. Siegel, D. M., & Hurley, S. The role of the child’s preference in custody proceedings. Family Law Quarterly, 1977, 11, 1–58.Google Scholar
  53. Skinner, B. F. Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Bantam, 1971.Google Scholar
  54. Tapp, J. L., & Levine, F. J. Legal socialization: Strategies for an ethical legality. Stanford Law Review, 1974, 27, 1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Torney, J. V. Socialization of attitudes toward the legal system. Inj. L. Tapp and F. J. Levine (Eds.), Law, justice, & the individual in society: Psychological and legal issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1977.Google Scholar
  56. Wald, M. S. Legal policies affecting children: A lawyer’s request for aid. Child Development, 1976, 47, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weinreb, L. L. Generalities of the Fourth Amnendment. University of Chicago Law Review, 1974, 42, 47–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wicklund, R. A. Freedom and reactance. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1974.Google Scholar
  59. Williams, M., & Hall, J. Knowledge of the law in Texas: Socio-economic and ethnic differences. Law and Society Review, 1972, 7, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolfe, M. Childhood and privacy. In I. Altman and J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 3 ). New York: Plenum Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  61. Worchel, S., & Brehm, J. W. Direct and implied social restoration of freedom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 18, 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zalkind, S. S. (Ed.). Civil liberties. Issue of Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 57(2).Google Scholar
  63. Zellman, G. L. Antidemocratic beliefs: A survey and some explanations. Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31 (2), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary B. Melton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of NebraskaLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations