Advertisement

The Selection of Heterokaryons and Cell Hybrids Using the Biochemical Inhibitors Iodoacetamide and Diethylpyrocarbonate

  • Woodring Erik Wright

Abstract

Most selective systems for isolating fusion products between different cell types rely on the preferential ability of the fusion products to grow in a special medium (reviewed in Ringertz and Savage, 1976). Because these selection systems require cell division, most experiments in somatic cell genetics have studied clones of cell hybrids rather than heterokaryons, which are the immediate product of the fusion of two different cells. However, there are many fundamental differences between hybrids and heterokaryons that make the latter an important subject of investigation. One of the most significant derives from the fact that most differentiated cells are slowly dividing or postmitotic. Restricting the analysis to only those fusion products capable of rapid cell division and clone formation thus automatically biases results against the expression of differentiated functions. This bias is particularly compelling if one examines the frequency with which heterokaryons give rise to growing hybrid clones. Although this varies widely with the cell combination employed and ranges from as much as one in three (Kao et al., 1969) to as few as one in 100, 000 (Miller and Ruddle, 1976), an average value appears to be that about one in 100 heterokaryons gives rise to a hybrid clone. These clones thus represent a highly selected subset of all fusion products. Conclusions about the expression of differentiated functions in the clones must therefore be interpreted with caution.

Keywords

Cell Hybrid Cell Rescue Hybrid Clone Somatic Cell Genetic Fusion Combination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coleman, J. R., Konieczny, S. F., Lawrence, J. B., Shaffer, M., and Coleman, A. W., 1980, Differentiation properties of homotypic hybrid cells derived from myogenic cell lines, Eur. J. Cell Biol. 22:402.Google Scholar
  2. Davidson, R. L., O’Malley, J. A., and Wheeler, T. B., 1976, Polyethylene glycol-induced mammalian cell hybridization: Effect of polyethelene glycol molecular weight and concentration, Somat. Cell Genet. 2:271–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Vries, J. E., van Benthem, M., and Rumke, P., 1973, Separation of viable from nonviable tumor cells by flotation on a Ficoll-Triosil mixture, Transplantation 15:409–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kao, F.-T., Johnson, R. T., and Puck, T. T. 1969, Complementation analysis on virus fused Chinese hamster cells with nutritional markers, Science 164:312–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Latt, S. A., 1973, Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70:3395–3399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Miller, R. A., and Ruddle, F. H., 1976, Pluripotent teratocarcinoma-thymus somatic cell hybrids, Cell 9:45–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nehls, R., 1978, The use of metabolic inhibitors for the selection of fusion products of higher plant protoplasts, Mol. Gen. Genet. 166:117–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Norwood, T. H., Ziegler, C. J., and Martin, G. M., 1976, Dimethyl sulfoxide enhances polyethylene glycol-mediated somatic cell fusion, Somat. Cell Genet. 2:263–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ringertz, N., and Savage, R. E., 1976, Cell Hybrids, Academic Press, New York, pp. 147–158.Google Scholar
  10. Wright, W. E., 1978, The isolation of heterokaryons and hybrids by a selective system using irreversible biochemical inhibitors, Exp. Cell Res. 112:395–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wright, W. E., 1981a, The synthesis of rat myosin light chains in heterokaryons formed between undifferentiated rat myoblasts and chick skeletal myocytes, J. Cell Biol. 91:11–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wright, W. E., 1982, The regulation of myosin light chain synthesis in heterokaryons between differentiated and undifferentiated myogenic cells, in: Muscle and Cell Motility, Volume II (R. M. Dowbin and J. W. Shay, eds.), pp. 177–184, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Wright, W. E., 1981b, The recovery of heterokaryons at high cell density following isolation using irreversible biochemical inhibitors, Somat. Cell Genet 7:769–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wright, W. E., and Gros, F., 1981, Coexpression of myogenic functions in L6 rat x T984 mouse myoblast hybrids, Develop. Biol. 86:236–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zakrzewski, S., and Sperling, K., 1980, Genetic heterogeneity of Fanconi’s anemia demonstrated by somatic cell hybrids, Hum. Genet. 56:81–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Woodring Erik Wright
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cell Biology and Internal MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science CenterDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations