Advertisement

The Thermal Conductivity of the Rocks in the Bureau of Mines Standard Rock Suite

  • M. T. Morgan
  • G. A. West

Abstract

The thermal conductivities of eight rocks in the Bureau of Mines Standard Rock Suite were measured in air over the range 373 to 533 K. The rocks and their average thermal conductivities at 373 K before thermal cycling were (1) Sioux quartzite, 5.5 W/(m·K); (2) St. Cloud gray granodiorite, 2.7 W/(m·K); (3) Dresser basalt, 3.0 W/(m·K); (4) Barre granite, 2.5 W/(m·K); (5) Holston limestone, 2.5 W/(m·K); (6) Westerly granite, 2.3 W/(m·K); (7) Berea sandstone, 2.2 W/(m·K); and (8) Salem limestone, 1.7 W/(m·K). The thermal conductivity at a given temperature decreased by as much as 9% after initial heating to maximum temperature (533 K), but additional heating cycles had no further effect. Variations due to orientation (anisotropy) were within the precision of measurements (±5%). The thermal conductivities were linear with the reciprocal of the temperature and were within 14% of published data by other methods.

Measurements were made by the cut-bar comparison method using Pyroceram 9606 glass-ceramic metering bars. The apparatus was a Dynatech TCFCM-N20 comparative instrument controlled by a Hewlett Packard 3052A data acquisition system. The computer control increased the instrument efficiency by more than a factor of 3 because overnight and weekend operation could be continued without surveillance and because computations were automatic.

Keywords

Thermal Conductivity Thermal Conductivity Measurement Salt Dome Berea Sandstone Westerly Granite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. J. Hanley, D. P. DeWitt, and R. E. Taylor, The Thermal Transport Properties at Normal and Elevated Temperature of Eight Representative Rocks, Proc. Symp. Thermophys. Prop. 7: 386–91 (1977).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. J. Hanley, D. P. DeWitt, and R. F. Roy, The Thermal Diffusivity of Eight Well-Characterized Rocks for the Temperature Range 300–1000 K, Eng. Geol. (Amsterdam) 12: 31–47 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. A. Navarro and D. P. DeWitt, “Line Heat Source Method and Its Suitability for Measuring Thermal Conductivity of Rocks,” Report 26, Thermophysical Properties Research Center, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana (May 1974).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. W. Krech, F. A. Henderson, and K. E. Hjelmstad, “A Standard Rock Suite for Rapid Excavation Research,” RI 7865, U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C. (1974).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. T. Morgan, “Thermal Conductivity of Rock Salt from Louisiana Salt Domes,” ORNL/TM-6809, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee (June 1979).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. S. Touloukian, R. W. Powell, C. Y. Ho, and P. G. Klemens, “Thermophysical Properties of Matter,” Vol. 2, IFI/Plenum, New York (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. A. Didion, “An Analysis and Design of a Linear Guarded Cut-Bar Apparatus for Thermal Conductivity Measurements,” AD-665789, available from NTIS (January 1968).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. M. Ide, The Velocity of Sound in Rocks and Glasses as a Function of Temperature, J. Geol. 45: 689 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Purdue Research Foundation 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. T. Morgan
    • 1
  • G. A. West
    • 1
  1. 1.Chemical Technology DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations