Advertisement

Analysis of Cell Surface Antigens with Monoclonal Antibodies

  • Alan F. Williams
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 50)

Abstract

This article will deal with the use of monoclonal antibodies as the primary tool for the identification and analysis of complex mixtures of molecules. The analysis of the cell surface of lymphocytes will be mainly discussed but the approach outlined is equally useful for other cell types and molecular mixtures from other parts of the cell. Antigens of interest for genetic studies will be briefly discussed.

Keywords

Fluorescence Activate Cell Sorter Antigenic Determinant Myeloma Cell Line Clone Cell Line Membrane Molecule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Helenius and K. Simons, Solubilization of membranes by detergents, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 415:29 (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. F. Williams, Differentiation antigens of the lymphocyte cell surface, in “Contemporary Topics in Molecular Immunology 6:83, G. L. Ada and R. R. Porter, eds., Plenum Press, New York (1977).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Milstein, Monoclonal antibodies, Scientific American 243:56 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. E. Hood, I. L. Weissman and W. B. Wood, “Immunology”, The Benjamin/Cummings Publ. Co. Inc., 2727 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 (1978).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. F. Williams, A. N. Barclay, M. Letarte-Muirhead and R. J. Morris, Rat Thy-1 antigens from thymus and brain: their tissue distribution, purification and chemical composition, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 41:51 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. G. Campbell, J. Gagnon, K. B. M. Reid and A. F. Williams, Rat brain Thy-1 glycoprotein. The amino acid sequence, disulphide bonds and an unusual hydrophobic region. Biochem.J. 195:15 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. A. Boyse and L. J. Old, Some aspects of normal and abnormal cell surface genetics, Ann. Rev. Gent. 3:269 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Köhler and C. Milstein, Derivation of specific antibody-producing tissue culture and tumor lines by cell fusion, Eur. J. Immunol. 6:511 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. F. Williams, G. Galfrè and C. Milstein, Analysis of cell surfaces by xenogeneic myeloma-hybrid antibodies: differentiation antigens of rat lymphocytes, Cell, 12:663 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10..
    R. H. Kennett, T. J. McKearn and K. B. Bechtol, eds., “Monoclonal Antibodies. Hybridomas: A New Dimension in Biological Analyses”, Plenum Press, New York and London.(1980).Google Scholar
  11. 11..
    J. Schroder, K. Autio, J. M. Jarvis and C. Milstein, Chromosome segregation and expression of rat immunoglobulin in rat/mouse hybrid myelomas, Immunogenetics 10:125 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12..
    J. F. Kearney”, A. Radbruch, B. Liesegang and K. Rajewsky, A new mouse myeloma cell line that has lost immunoglobulin expression but permits the construction of antibody-secreting hybrid cell lines, J. Immunol. 123:1548 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13..
    A. F. Williams, Cell-surface antigens of lymphocytes: markers and molecules, Biochem. Soc. Symp. 45:27 (1980).Google Scholar
  14. 14..
    P. K. Nakane, Recent progress in the peroxidase-labeled antibody method, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 254:203 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15..
    L. A. Herzenberg and L. A. Herzenberg, Analysis and separation using the fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) in “Handbook of Experimental Immunology”, 3rd edn., D. M. Weir, ed., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford (1978).Google Scholar
  16. 16..
    C. Parish and J. Hayward, The lymphocyte surface. I. Relation between Fc receptors, C’3 receptors and surface immunoglobulins, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 187:47 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17..
    J. Klein, “Biology of the Mouse Histocompatibility-2 Complex”, Springer-Verlag, New York (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18..
    A. N. Barclay, The localization of populations of lymphocytes defined by monoclonal antibodies in rat lymphoid tissues, Immunology 42:593 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19..
    F. Karush, The affinity of antibody: range, variability, and the role of multivalence, in “Comprehensive Immunology” 5, R. A. Good and G. W. Litman, eds., Plenum Medical, New York and London (1978).Google Scholar
  20. 20..
    D. W. Mason and A. F. Williams, The kinetics of antibody binding to membrane antigens in solution and at the cell surface, Biochem. J. 187:1 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21..
    R. Hyman, Studies on surface antigen variants. Isolation of two complementary variants for Thy 1.2, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 50:415 (1973).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22..
    T. V. Rajan, H-2 antigen variants in a cultured heterozygous mouse leukemia cell line, Immunogenetics 10:423 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23..
    E. D. Crum and D. D. McGregor, Functional properties of T and B cells isolated by affinity chormatography from rat thoracic duct lymph, Cellular Immunology 23:211 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24..
    L. J. Wysocki and V. L. Sato, ‘Panning’ for lymphocytes: A method for cell selection, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75:2844 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25..
    B. Holtkamp, M. Cramer, H. Lemke and K. Rajewsky, Isolation of a cloned cell line expressing variant H-2Kk using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, Nature 289:66 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26..
    W. R. McMaster and A. F. Williams, Monoclonal antibodies to Ia antigens from rat thymus, Immunological Reviews 47:117 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27..
    W. R. A. Brown, A. N. Barclay, C. A. Sunderland and A. F. Williams, Identification of a glycophorin-like molecule at the cell surface of rat thymocytes, Nature 289:456 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28..
    M. Webb, D. W. Mason and A. F. Williams, Inhibition of the mixed lymphocyte response with a monoclonal antibody specific for a rat T lymphocyte subset, Nature 282:841 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29..
    J. P. Van Wauwe, J. R. De Mey and J. G. Goossens, OKT3: A monoclonal anti-human T lymphocyte antibody with potent mitogenic properties, J. Immunol. 124:2708 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30..
    D. P. Dialynas, M. R. Loken, A. L. Glasebrook and F. W. Fitch, Lyt-2-/Lyt-3- variants of a cloned cytolytic T cell line lack antigen receptor function in cytolysis, J. Exp. Med. 153:595 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31..
    K. Adetugbo, C. Milstein and D. S. Secher, Molecular analysis of spontaneous somatic mutants, Nature 265:299 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32..
    H. T. Orr, D. Lancet, R. J. Robb, J. A. Lopez de Castro and J. L. Strominger, The heavy chain of human histocompatibility antigen HLA-B7 contains an immunoglobulin-like region, Nature 282:266 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33..
    J. E. Coligan, T. J. Kindt, H. Uehara, J. Martinko and S. G. Nathenson, Primary structure of a murine transplantation antigen, Nature 291:35 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34..
    R. Nairn, K. Yamaga and S. G. Nathenson, Biochemistry of the gene products from murine MHC mutants, Ann. Rev. Genet. 14:241 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35..
    J. Klein, The major histocompatibility complex of the mouse, Science 203:516 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36..
    G. Moller, ed., “Hybrid Myeloma Monoclonal Antibodies Against MHC Products” Immunological Reviews 47, Munksgaard, Copenhagen (1979).Google Scholar
  37. 37..
    F. E. Cohen, J. Novotny, M. J. E. Sternberg, D. G. Campbell and A. F. Williams, Analysis of structural similarities between brain Thy-1 antigen and immunoglobulin domains. Evidence for an evolutionary relationship and a hypothesis for its functional significance, Biochem. J. 195:31 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38..
    R. Hyman and I. Trowbridge, Analysis of the biosynthesis of T25 (Thy-1) in mutant lymphoma cells, in. “Differentiation of Normal and Neoplastic Hematopoietic Cells”, B. Clarkson, P. Marks and J. Till, eds., Cold Spring Harbor Lab, Cold Spring Harbor, New York (1978).Google Scholar
  39. 39..
    R. Hyman and V. Stallings, Evidence for a gene extinguishing cell-surface expression of the Thy-1 antigen, Immunogenetics 6:447 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40..
    R. Hyman, K. Cunningham and V. Stallings, Effect of gene dosage on cell-surface expression of Thy-1 antigen in somatic cell hybrids between Thy-1- Abelson-leukemia-virus induced lymphomas and Thy-1+ mouse lymphomas, Immunogenetics 12:381 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41..
    R. Hyman and V. Stallings, Characterization of a TL-variant of a homozygous TL+ mouse lymphoma, Immunogenetics 3:75 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42..
    R. Hyman and I Trowbridge, Two complementation classes of T200 (Ly-5) glycoprotein-negative mutants, Immunogenetics 12:511 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan F. Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.MRC Cellular Immunology Unit, Sir William Dunn School of PathologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations