Advertisement

Development of Standards — Assessment of Health Hazards and Other Factors

  • Michael H. Repacholi
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 49)

Abstract

Applications of microwave and radiofrequency energy are increasing in number and diversity in industry, medicine, commerce, research, communications and the home. Although these applications provide significant benefits to mankind, they may also constitute hazards to the individual through uncontrolled and excessive emissions of radiant energy. It has been substantiated that at sufficiently high levels, exposure to microwave and radiofrequency fields can produce not only biological effects but pose a definite risk to health. Thus there is a need to set limits on the amount of exposure which individuals can receive without sustaining any injury.

Keywords

Exposure Level Health Hazard Health Risk Assessment Exposure Standard American National Standard Institute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M.H. Repacholi, Differentiation between biological effects and health hazards: Scaling from animals, Presented at the 4th course: Advances in biological effects and dosimetry of low-energy electromagnetic fields. Erice, Sicily, March 28-April 8, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Reis, Potential interference with medical electronic devices, Bull. N.Y. Acad. Med. 55 (11): 1216–1221 (1979).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.H. Repacholi, Proposed exposure limits for microwave and radiofrequency radiations in Canada, J. Microwave Power 13 (2): 199–211 (1978).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Health Organization, Environmental Health Criteria for Radiofrequency and Microwaves, WHO Geneva, Switzerland (1980).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.M. Barwin and W.R. Adey, Sensitivity of calcium binding in cerebral tissue to weak environmental electric fields oscillating at low frequency, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA), 73: 1999–2003 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection, Implications of Commission recommendations that doses be kept as low as readily achievable, ICRP Publication, No. 22, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1973).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O.P. Gandhi, E.L. Hunt and J.A. D’Andrea, Electromagnetic power deposition in man and animals with and without ground and reflector effects, Radio Science, 12–65: 39–47 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.A. Tell and F. Harlen, A Review of selected biological effects and dosimetric data useful for development of radiofrequency safety standards for human exposure, J. Microwave Power l4 (4): 405–424 (1979).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Committee C95.4, “Safety level with respect to human exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (300 kHz - 100 GHz)”, Eighth Draft, 24 March (1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Conference of Governmental and Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Committee on Physical Agents. Proposed Radio-frequency Radiation Threshold Limit Value. Meeting, Rockville, Maryland, March 12–13, (1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael H. Repacholi
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiation Protection BureauHealth and Welfare CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations