Advertisement

Behavioral and Cognitive Deficits in Cerebrovascular Accident and Closed Head Injury: Implications for Cognitive Rehabilitation

  • James D. Thomas
  • Lance E. Trexler

Abstract

A major development within the discipline of neuropsychology involves the increasing contribution of the neuropsychologist to the comprehensive rehabilitation of the brain injured patient. Recent reports in the literature (Brinkman, 1979; Diller, 1976; Diller and Gordon, 1981; Giantusos, 1980; Gudeman, Golden, and Craine, 1978) have noted the recent expansion of the role of the neuropsychologist beyond the traditional ones of diagnosing, documenting, and localizing neurological damage. The new role includes the added functions of (1) developing paradigms which are basically theoretical, (2) planning strategies that will serve to remediate the behavioral and cognitive deficits that arise as a consequence of brain injury; the applied implementation of theory. Both activities may be subsumed under the title of cognitive rehabilitation.

Keywords

Cognitive Deficit Linear Discriminant Analysis Cerebrovascular Accident Order Factor Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bentler, P.M. Factor Analysis. In P.M. Bentler, D.J. Lettieri, & G.A. Austin (Eds.), Data Analysis Strategies and Designs for Substance Abuse Research. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1976.Google Scholar
  2. Blackwood, D., & Long, C.J., Factor analytic investigation of Halstead Reitan Battery. Unpublished manuscript, Good Samaritan Hospital; Phoenix, Arizona, undated.Google Scholar
  3. Blackwood, W., Hallpike, J., Kocén, R. & Mair, W., Atheromatous disease of the carotid arterial system and embolism from the heart in cerebral infarction: A morbid anatomical study. Brain, 1969, 92, 897–910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brinkman, S.D., Rehabilitation of the neurologically impaired patient: The contribution of the neuropsychologist. Clinical Neuropsychology, 1979, 1 (2), 39–44.Google Scholar
  5. Castaigne, P., Lhermitte, F., Gautier, J., Escourolle, R. & Derouesne, C., Internal carotid artery occlusion. Brain, 1970, 93, 231–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chusid, J., Correlative Neuroanatomy and Functional Neurology ( 15th ed ). Los Altos, CA: Lange Medical Publications, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. Comrey, A.L., Common methodological problems in factor analytic studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coppinger, N.W., Bortner, R.W. & Saucer, R.T., A factor analysis of psychological deficit. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1963, 103, 23–43.Google Scholar
  9. Diller, L., A model for cognitive retraining in rehabilitation. The Clinical Psychologist, 1976, 29, 13–14.Google Scholar
  10. Diller, L. & Gordon, W.A., Rehabilitation and clinical neuropsychology. In S.B. Fiscov & T.J. Boll (Eds.). Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. Feirling, E.H., Brock’s Injuries of the Brain and Spinal Cord and Their Coverings ( 5th ed ). New York: Springer Publishing Co., 1974.Google Scholar
  12. Fletcher, J.M., Rice, W.J., & Ray, R.M., Linear discriminant function analysis in neuropsychological research: Some uses and abuses. Cortex, 1978, 14, 564–577.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gianutsos, R., What is cognitive rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation, 1980, 36–40.Google Scholar
  14. Gilroy, J., & Meyer, J.S., Medical Neurology ( 2nd ed ). New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., 1975.Google Scholar
  15. Golden, C.J., Validity of the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological battery in a mixed psychiatric and brain-injured population. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 1043–1051.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Golden, C.J., Osmon, D.C., Moses, J.A., & Berg, R.A., Interpretation of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: A Casebook Approach. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1981.Google Scholar
  17. Goldstein, G., & Shelly, C.H., Statistical and normative studies of the Halstead neuropsychological test battery relevant to a neuro-psychiatric setting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972, 34, 603–620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldstein, G., & Shelly, C.H., Univariate v.s. multivariate analysis in neuropsychological test assessment of lateralized brain damage. Cortex, 1973, 9, 204–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldstein, S., Kleinknecht, R. and Gallo, A., Neuropsychological changes associated with carotid endarterectomy. Cortex, 1970, 6, 308–322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gudeman, H., Golden, C.J., & Craine, J., The role of the neuropsychological evaluation in the rehabilitation of the brain-injured patient: A program in neuroretraining. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1978, 8, 44. ( Ms. No. 1693 )Google Scholar
  21. Guilford, J.P., When not to factor analyze. In D.N. Jackson & S. Messick (Eds.), Problems in Human Assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. 1967.Google Scholar
  22. Gurdijan, E.S., Recent developments in biomechanics, management, and mitigation of head injuries. In T.N. Chase & D.B. Tower (Eds.), The Nervous System (Vol. 2): The Clinical Neurosciences. New York: Raven Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  23. Gurdijan, E., Linder, D., Hardy, W., & Thomas, L. “Completed stroke” due to occlusive cerebrovascular disease. Neurology, 1961, 11, 724–733.Google Scholar
  24. Halstead, W.C., Brain and Intelligence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar
  25. Harris, A. and Levin, S. Cerebral embolism in mitral stenosis. Annuals of Internal Medicine, 1941, 15, 637–643.Google Scholar
  26. Hellerstein, H. and Martin, J. Incidence of thromboembolic lesions accompanying myocardial infarction. American Heart Journal, 1974 33, 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Howarth, E. Factor analysis has only just begun to fight–A reply to Lykken. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1972, 6, 268–272.Google Scholar
  28. Jasper, H.H. Thalamic reticular system. In Sheer, D.E. (Ed.) Electrical Stimulation of the Brain: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Neurobehavioral Systems. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  29. Jennett, B., & Teasdale, G. Management of Head Injuries. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Co., 1981.Google Scholar
  30. Kane, W. & Aronson, S. Cardiac disorders predisposing to embolic stroke. Stroke, 1970, 1, 164–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klecka, W.R. Discriminant analysis. In N.H. Hie, C.H. Hull, J.C. Jenkins, K. Steinbrenner & D.H. Bent (Eds.) SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1975.Google Scholar
  32. Lee, H.B. & Comrey, A.L. Distortions in a commonly used factor analytic procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1979, 14, 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lezak, M.D. Neuropsychological Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  34. Lishman, W.A. Organic Psychiatry: The Psychological Consequences of Cerebral Disorder. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1978.Google Scholar
  35. McCall, R.B. Addendum: The use of multivariate procedures in developmental psychology. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s Manual of Child Psychology (Vol. 1 ), New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1970.Google Scholar
  36. Meyer, J., Charney, J., Rivera, V. & Mathew, N. Cerebral embolism: Prospective clinical analysis of 42 cases. Stroke, 1971, 2, 541–554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nie, N.H., Hull, C.J., Jenkins, J.G., Steinbrenner, K., & Bent, D.H. SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences ( 2nd Ed. ). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1975.Google Scholar
  38. Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory ( 2nd Ed. ). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1978.Google Scholar
  39. Parsons, O.A. & Prigatano, G.P. Methodological considerations in clinical neuropsychological research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 608–619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Perez, F., Gay, J. & Taylor R. WAIS performance of neurologically impaired aged. Psychological Reports, 1975, 37, 1043–1047.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perez, F., Gay, J., Taylor, R. & Rivera, V. Patterns of memory performance in the neurologically impaired aged. The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 1975, 1, 347–355.Google Scholar
  42. Perez, F., Stump, D., Gay, J. & Hart, V. Intellectual performance in multi-infarct dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: A replication study. The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 1976, 3, 181–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pimentel, R.A., & Frey, D.F. Multivariate analysis of variance and discriminant analysis. In P.W. Colgan (Ed.), Quantative Ethology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1978.Google Scholar
  44. Reitan, R. and Fitzhugh, K. Behavioral deficits in groups with cerebral vascular lesions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 37, 215–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reitan, R. Instructions and procedures for administrating the Neuro-psychological Test Battery used at the Neuropsychology Laboratory, Indiana University Medical Center. Unpublished manuscript, undated.Google Scholar
  46. Royce, J.R. Factors as theoretical constructs. In D.N. Jackson, & S. Messick (Eds.), Problems in Human Assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1967.Google Scholar
  47. Royce, J.R., Yeudall, L.T., & Bock, C. Factor analytic studies of human brain damage: I. First and second-order factors and their brain correlates. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1976, 11, 381–419.Google Scholar
  48. Rummel, R.J., Applied Factor Analysis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  49. Russell, E.W. Reanalysis of Halstead’s biological intelligence factor matrix. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973, 37, 699–705.Google Scholar
  50. Sanathanan, L.P. Discriminant analysis. In D.J. Amick & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Introductory Multivariate Analysis for Educational, Psychological, and Social Research. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Co., 1973.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, A. Principles underlying human brain functions in neuropsychological sequelae of different neuropathological processes. In S.B. Fiscov & T.J. Boll (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981.Google Scholar
  52. Sternberg, R.J. Intelligence, Information Processing and Analogical Reasoning: The Compenetial Analysis of Human Abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1977.Google Scholar
  53. Sternberg, R.J. The nature of mental abilities. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 214–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stuss, D.T., & Trites, R.L. Classification of neurological status using multiple discriminant function analysis of neuropsychological test scores. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Swiercinsky, D.P., & Warnock, J.K. Comparison of the neuropsychological key and discriminant approaches in predicting cerebral damage and localization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 808–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Symonds, C. Concussion and contusion of the brain and their sequelae. In E.H. Feirling (Ed.), Brock’s Injuries of the Brain and Spinal Cord and Their Coverings (5th ed.). New York: Springer Publishing Co., 1974.Google Scholar
  57. Tatsuoka, M.M. Discriminant analysis. In P.M. Bentler, D.J. Lettieri, & G.A. Austin (Eds.), Data Analysis Strategies and Designs for Substance Abuse Research. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1976.Google Scholar
  58. Thomas, J.D., & Trexler, L.E. On the stability of the factor structure of the WAIS and Wechsler Memory Scale: A comparative factor analytic approach. (Manuscript in preparation) Indianapolis, IN: Community Hospital.Google Scholar
  59. Toole, J. and Patel, A. Cerebrovascular disorders, 2nd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
  60. Toone, E. Cerebral manifestations of bacterial endocarditis. Annuals of Internal Medicine, 1941, 14, 1551–1574.Google Scholar
  61. Trexler, L. Behavioral deficit in vascular disease. Doctoral Dissertation, Purdue University, 1979.Google Scholar
  62. Walsh, K.W. Neuropsychology: A Clinical Approach. New York: Churchill Livingston Publishers, 1978.Google Scholar
  63. Wechsler, D. A standardized memory scale for clinical use. Journal of Psychology, 1945, 19, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wechsler, D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Manual. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1955.Google Scholar
  65. Wheeler, L. & Reitan, R.M. Discriminant functions applied to the problem of predicting cerebral damage from behavioral tests: A cross validation study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963, 16, 681–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wheeler, L., Burke, C.J. & Reitan, R.M. An application of discriminant functions to the problem of predicting brain damage using behavioral variables. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963, 16, 417–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Williams, M. Brain Damage, Behavior and the Mind. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • James D. Thomas
    • 1
  • Lance E. Trexler
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Neuropsychology Service Medical Psychology DepartmentCommunity Hospital of IndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations