Advertisement

The Retraining of Frontal Lobe Dysfunction

  • James F. Craine

Abstract

The mystery and enigma of human frontal lobe cortical function has been a topic of fascination to a number of psychologists for many years. Unfortunately, information concerning function is usually best obtained as the result of a malfunction due to a known lesion. Goldstein (1944) reported a noticeable impairment of abstract attitude and that although these individuals appeared to have sufficient ability to handle routine work, they seemed to lack initiative, foresight, and the ability to handle new tasks. They were also frequently impaired in voluntary shifting of activity and choice, but because these are often rather subtle behaviors, he observed that these impairments would often be overlooked in everyday life. Similarly, A. R. Luria stated that the basic thought defect characteristic of patients with lesions of the frontal lobes does not consist of an absence of logical reasoning abilities, because they can reason from a logical basis and can find relationships and even solve problems in analogy (Luria, 1973). Instead, their defect appears when faced with the necessity of making a goal-directed choice from a number of equally probable alternatives.

Keywords

Frontal Lobe Verbal Fluency Frontal Lesion Frontal Lobe Dysfunction Prefrontal Lobe 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Goldman, P. S. Development and plasticity of frontal association cortex in the infrahuman primate. In C. L. Ludlow & M. E. Doran-Quine (Eds.), The neurological bases of language disorders in children: Methods and directions for research. NIH Publication No. 79–440, Aug. 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Goldstein, K. The mental changes due to frontal lobe damage. Journal of Psychology, 1944, 17, 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gudeman, H., Golden, C., & Craine, J. The role of neuropsychological evaluation in the rehabilitation of the brain-injured patient: A program in neurotraining. Manuscript Number 1693 Abstracted in the JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1978, 8 (2), 44Google Scholar
  4. Hecaen, H. & Albert, M. Human neuropsychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. Lechner, H., Ott, E., Ladurner, G. & Bertha, G. Static-dynamic aspects of cerebral blood flow in relation to brain function. In F. Hoffmeister & C. Muller (Eds.). Brain function in old age. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. Lezak, M. D. Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. Luria, A. R. Restoration of function after brain injury. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1963.Google Scholar
  8. Luria, A. R. The frontal lobes and the regulation of behavior. In K. Pribram & A. R. Luria (Eds.) Psychophysiology of the frontal lobes. New York and London: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. Luria, A. R. The working brain. New York: Basic Books, 1974. Teuber, H. L. The riddle of frontal lobe function in man. In J. M.Google Scholar
  10. Warren & K. Akert (Eds.). The frontal granular cortex and behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • James F. Craine
    • 1
  1. 1.Neuropsychology ServiceHawaii State HospitalKaneoheUSA

Personalised recommendations