Surface Mapping Characteristics of Left Fascicular Blocks

  • I. Préda
  • Gy. Kozmann
  • Z. Antalóczy


When Rosenbaum et al. (1968) decided upon the criteria for the diagnosis of left anterior hemiblocks, he remarked that it was difficult to draw a precise dividing line between ordinary left axis deviation and left axis deviation due to left anterior hemiblocks. The existence of different degrees of left anterior hemiblocks has been recognized from the outset: different left anterior hemiblock patterns may occur, for example in the same patient, during aberrant ventricular conduction of premature supraventricular beats induced experimentally by programmed atrial stimulation (Kulbertus et al., 1976). As suggested by Durrer et al. (1966) the forme fruste endocardial cushion defect can produce left axis deviation probably due to abnormal development of the conducting system. The left posterior hemiblock as well as the left septal fascicular block do not behave as clearcut phenomena, and the different authors agree on their deceptive and non-specific nature (Rosenbaum et al., 1972); however in the majority of cases the histological findings are consistent with the known electrocardiographic criteria (Demoulin and Kulbertus, 1972).


Anterior Chest Wall Main Maximum Posterior Chest Wall Left Axis Deviation Electrocardiographic Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Antalóczy, Z., 1972, Investigation on the electrical activity of the heart. Medicina, Budapest (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
  2. van Dam, R. Th., 1976, Ventricular activation in human and canine bundle branch block, in.: “Conduction System of the Heart,” H. J. J. Wellens, K. I. Lie, and M. J. Janse, eds., Leiden, pp. 377–384.Google Scholar
  3. Demoulin, J. C., and Kulbertus, H. E., 1972, Histopathological examination of concept of left hemiblock, Brit. Heart J., 34: 807–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Durrer, D., Roos, J., and van Dam, R. Th., 1966, The electrogenesis of the electrocardiogram of patients with ostium defects (ventral atrial septal defects), Amer. Heart J., 71:642–650.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Durrer, D., van Dam, R. Th., Freud, G. E., Janse, M. J., Meijler, F. L., and Arzbaecher, R. C., 1970, Total excitation of the isolated human heart, Circulat. Res., 41: 899–913.Google Scholar
  6. Hoffman, I., Mehte, J., Hilsenrath, J., and Hamby, R. L., 1976, Anterior conduction delay; a possible cause for prominent anterior QRS forces, J. Electrocardiol., 9:15–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kulbertus, H. E., de Levalrutten, Fr., and Casters, P., 1976, Vectorcardiographic study of aberrant conduction, anterior displacement of QRS; another form of intraventricular block, Brit. Heart J., 38: 549–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kozmann, Gy., Preda, I., Shakin, V. V., Szlávik, F., and Antalóczy, Z., 1976, Computer-aided method for the comparison of surface potential and acceleration maps, in: “Computers in Cardiology,” Washington University, St. Luis, pp. 29–35.Google Scholar
  9. Kozmann, Gy., and Preda, I., 1981, Estimation of cardiac excitation on the basis of stimulus response functions and epicardial activation isochrones, in this volume.Google Scholar
  10. McLaughlin, V. W., Flowers, N. C., Horan, L. G., and Killam, H. A. W. 1974, Surface potential contribution from discrete elements of ventricular wall. A closed chest, postmortem-documented prospective study, Amer. J. Cardiol., 34: 302–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Medrano, G. A., Brenes, C. P., De Micheli, A., Cisneros, F., and Sodi-Pallares, D., 1970, The anterior subdivision block of the left bundle branch of His, 1. The ventricular activation process, J. Electrocardiol., 3: 7–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nakaya, Y., Hiasa, Y., Murayama, Y., Ueda, S., Nagao, T., Niki, T., Mori, H., and Takashima, Y., 1978, Prominent anterior QRS force as a manifestation of left septal fascicular block, J. Electrocardiol., 11:39–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Padua, F., des Reis, D. D., Lopes, V. M., Pereira Miguel, I., Lopes, M. G., da Silva, T. M., and de Padua, I. P., 1978, Left median hemiblock — a chimera? Adv. Cardiol., 21:242–248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Préda, I., Bukosza, I., Kozmann, Gy., Shakin, V. V., Székely, A., and Antalóczy, Z., 1979, Surface potential distribution on the human thoracic surface in left bundle branch block, Japanese Heart J., 20:7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rosenbaum, M. B., Elizari, M. V., and Lazzari, J. O., 1968, “Los Hemibloqueos,” Paidos, Buenos Aires, Argentinia.Google Scholar
  16. Rosenbaum, M. B., Elizari, M., Lazzari, J. O., Nau, G. I., Halpern, M. S., and Levi, R. J., 1972, The differential electrocardiographic manifestations of hemiblocks, bilateral bundle branch blocks and trifascicular blocks, in: “Advances of Electrocardiography,” Shlant, R., Hurst, J. W., eds., Grune and Stratton, New York, p. 145.Google Scholar
  17. Taccardi, B., 1963, Distribution of heart potentials on the thoracic surface of normal human subjects, Circulat. Res., 12:341–350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Taccardi, B., de Ambroggi, L., and yiganotti, C., 1976, Body-surface mapping of heart potentials, in: “Theoretical Basis of Elec-trocardiology,” C. V. Nelson and D. B. Geselowitz, eds., Clanderon Press, Oxford, pp. 436–466.Google Scholar
  19. Toyoshima, H., Sugiyama, S., Wada, M., Sugenoya, J., Toyama, J., and Yamada, K., 1974, Sequential change in the difference of potential distribution between a normal subject and simulated torso model, Japanese Heart J., 15:560–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Préda
    • 1
  • Gy. Kozmann
    • 2
  • Z. Antalóczy
    • 1
  1. 1.Postgraduate Medical SchoolBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Central Research Institute for PhysicsBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations