Advertisement

Drug Conjugates of Polymeric Microspheres as Tools in Cell Biology

  • I. Pecht
  • N. Mazurek
  • A. Petrank
  • S. Margel
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 47)

Abstract

Visualisation and identification of specific sites on cell surfaces is of great importance for understanding various biological phenomena, such as cell-cell recognition in development, cell communication and differences between normal and tumor cell surfaces. Mapping of antigens and carbohydrate residues on the surface of cells has been studied intensively by various techniques, for example, using fluorescent, or radioactive antibodies or lectins1–3 or by binding biological macromolecules as markers, e.g. ferritin4, hemocyanin5, viruses6 and peroxidase7 to antibodies or lectins. The latter macromolecules were used as markers for transmission electron microscopy or for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Synthetic markers would naturally have several important advantages over the available biological reagents. Prominent amongst these advantages are control over a wide range of sizes of the microspheres, the modification of their chemical and mechanical properties and the possibility of introducing fluorescent or magnetic compounds into them. The latter compounds serve an essential role in the visualisation of the beads bound to the cells by their fluorescence in the microscope or their opacity in the electron microscope. Furthermore they allow for sorting and separation of components in cell populations.

Keywords

Mast Cell Sodium Cromoglycate Polymeric Microsphere Disodium Cromoglycate Histamine Secretion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E.R. Unanue, W.D. Perkins, and M.J. Karnovsky, Ligand induced movement of lymphocyte membrane macromolecules, J. Exp. Med. 136: 885 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Yahara, and G.M. Edelman, Restriction of the mobility of lymphocyte immunoglobulin receptors by Concanavalin A, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69: 608 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Pernis, L. Forni, and L. Amante, Immunoglobulin spots on the surface of rabbit lymphocytes, J. Exp. Med. 132: 1001 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Depetris, and M.C. Raff, Movement of lymphocyte surface antigens and receptors: the fluid nature of the lymphocyte plasma membrane and its immunological significance, Nature, 241: 257 (1973).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.B. Smith, and J.P. Ravel, Mapping of concanavalin A binding sites on the surface of several cell types, Dev. Biol. 27: 234 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Aoki, E. Boyse, L. Old, E. De harven, U. Hammerling, and M. Wood, G (Gross) and H-2 cell-surface antigens: location on gross leukemia cells by electron microscopy with visually labelled antibody, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 65: 569 (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Avrameas, Tmmunoenzyme techniques: enzymes as markers for the localization of antigens and antibodies, Int. Rev. Cytol. 27: 349, (1970).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.S. Linthicum, and S. Fell, Topography of lymphocyte surface immunoglobulin using scanning immunoelectron microscopy, J. Ultrastr. Res. 51: 55 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Rembaum, and S. Margel, Design of polymeric immunomicrospheres for cell labelling and cell separation, Brit. Polymer J. 10: 275 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.S. Molday, W.J. Dreyer, A. Rembaum, and S.P.S. Yen, New immunolatex spheres: visual markers of antigens on lymphocytes for scanning electron microscopy, J. Cell Biol. 64: 75 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Rembaum, S. Margel, and J. Levy, Polyglutaraldehyde: a new reagent for coupling proteins to microspheres and for labelling cell surface receptors, J. Immunol. Meth. 24: 239 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Margel, S. Zisblatt, and A. Rembaum, Polyglutaraldehyde: a new reagent for coupling proteins to microspheres and for labelling cell surface receptors. Simplified labelling method by means of non-magnetic and magnetic polyglutaraldehyde microspheres, J. Immunol. Meth. 28: 341 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Margel, and A. Rembaum, Synthesis and characterization of polyglutaraldehyde, potential reagent for protein immobilization and cell separation, Macromolecules 13: 19 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Margel, U. Beitler, and M. Offarim, A novel method for preparation of polyacrolein microspheres and their biological applications, Fourth Internati. Conf. on Surface and Colloid Science, IUPAC, Jerusalem, Israel, p. 14 (1981).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. Mazurek, G. Berger and I. Pecht, A binding site on mast cells and basophils for the anti-allergic drug cromolyn, Nature 286: 722 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.C. Foreman, M.B. Hallet, and J.L. Mongar, The relationship between histamine secretion and 45calcium uptake by mast cells, J. Physiol. 271: 193 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.C. Foreman, and J.L. Monger, Desensitization in the process of histamine secretion induced by antigen and dextran, J. Physiol. 239: 381 (1974).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.C. Foreman, J.L. Mongar, and B.D. Gomperts, Calcium ionophores and movement of calcium ions following the physiological stimulus to a secretory process, Nature 245: 249 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.S.G. Cox, Disodium cromoglycate (FPL 670) (Intal): a specific inhibitor of reaginic antibody-antigen mechanisms, Nature 216: 1328 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R.E.C. Altounyan, Review of clinical activity and mode of action of sodium cromoglycate, Clin. Allergy 10: 481 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.C. Foreman, and L.G. Garland, Cromoglycate and other antiallergic drugs: a possible mechanism of action, Br. Med. J. 1: 820 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. Mazurek, C. Geller-Bernstein, and I. Pecht, Affinity of calcium ions to the anti-allergic drug, dicromoglycate, FEBS Lett. 3: 194 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    N. Mazurek, G. Berger, and I. Pecht, Co-capping of fluorescently labeled IgE-receptor complexes and cromolyn-beads conjugates on clutured rat basophilic cells, submitted.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Pecht
    • 1
  • N. Mazurek
    • 1
  • A. Petrank
    • 1
  • S. Margel
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Chemical Immunology and Plastic ResearchThe Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations