Plasma Diagnostics by Electron Guns and Electric Field Probes on ISEE-1

  • Arne Pedersen
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSB, volume 79)


The ISEE-1 satellite, launched in October 1977, carried two small electron guns for control of the satellite potential. They formed part of a spherical double probe instrument for measurements of electric fields, (Mozer et al., 1978.) The intention was to reduce the asymmetrical photo-electron cloud emitted sunward and the possible influences of its negative space charge on the electric field measurements. Early diagnostic experiments with the electron guns lead to the conclusion that the photo-electron space charge problem is a relatively small source of interference for the electric field measurements, and the guns were therefore not used in connection with routine electric field measurements, but only operated during special diagnostic periods in order to understand better spacecraft charging and potential control. It is important to notice that it is only meaningful to speak about satellite potential control for a satellite with surfaces which are sufficiently conductive to allow currents to flow so that charge distributions are smoothed to the extent that voltage differences do not exceed typically 1.0 Volt. This can be achieved in practice with a layer of indium oxide (~105 /⎕).


Indium Oxide Plasma Diagnostics Floating Potential Electric Field Measurement Positive Satellite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arends, H.J. and Gonfalone, A.A., Mechanical opening system for vacuum tubes in space environment, Rev. Sci. Instrum., Vol. 47, no.1, pp 153–155, 1976.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Decreau, P.M.E., Etcheto, J., Knott, K., Pedersen, A., Wrenn, G.L., and Young, D.T., Multiexperiment determination of plasma density and temperature. Space Science Reviews, 22, pp 633–645, 1978.ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. DeForest, S.E., McIlwain, C.E., Plasma clouds in the magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res. 76, pp 3587–3611, 1971.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DeForest, S.E., Spacecraft Charging at Synchronous orbit, J. Geophys. Res., 77, pp 651–659, 1972.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fahleson, U.V., Plasma-vehicle interactions in Space. Some aspects on present knowledge and future development, in: “Photon and Particle Interactions with Surfaces in Space”, D. Reidel Publ. Co., pp 563–569, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gonfalone, A.A., Pedersen, A., Fahleson, U.V., Falthammar, C-G., Mozer, F.S., and Torbert, R.B., Spacecraft potential control on ISEE-1, in “Spacecraft Charging Technology — 1978”, NASA Conf. Publication 207, pp 256–267, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. Mozer, F.S., Torbert, R.B., Fahleson, U.V., Fälthammar, C-G., Gonfalone, A.A., and Pedersen, A., Measurements of quasistatic and low frequency fields with spherical double probes on the ISEE-1 spacecraft. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Electron.GE-16, (3) pp 258–259, 1978.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mozer, F.S., Torbert, R.B., Anderson, R.R., Gonfalone, A.A., Etcheto, J., and Harvey, C.C., Observation of radiation from an electron beam on-board ISEE-1, in “Chapman Conference on Waves and Instabilities in Space Plasma”, Denver Colorado, August 1979.Google Scholar
  9. Rubin, A.G., Bhavnani, K.H., Tautz, M.F., Charging of Spinning Spacecraft. Air Force Geophysical Laboratory Report TR-79–0261, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arne Pedersen
    • 1
  1. 1.Space Science Department of ESAESTECNoordwijkThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations