Advertisement

The use of Artificial Electron Beams as Probes of the Distant Magnetosphere

  • John R. Winckler
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSB, volume 79)

Abstract and Summary

Electron beams have been used as analytical tools in laboratory plasmas, particularly for diagnosing fluctuating fields. This paper describes experiments in which electron beams have been injected into the magnetosphere to diagnose plasma processes at great distance by measurements made in the ionosphere. In some of these experiments the conjugate region atmosphere was used to detect the electron beams. In others conjugate “echoes” were detected near the injection region. Conjugate locations, field line lengths, electric and magnetic drifts, field fluctuations and electron scattering and diffusion have been analyzed. Beams intended for probing have been injected with up to 40 kev energy and at currents up to 0.8 A. The injecting vehicle constitutes a complex system which produces major perturbations of the local ionosphere including a large space charge. These effects may propagate to large distances and affect the regions under study. The probing beams may also conceivably alter the distant plasmas. Experiences with echo detection by particle counters on some of the ECHO rocket series are discussed in some detail. The echoes are seen to respond to changes in the convection fields and to reflect auroral zone activity. Theoretical and experimental echo patterns are discussed. Evidence for beam pitch angle scattering and altered mirror heights is presented and may occur even in the time of one bounce period. The use of the atmospheric response to electron beams in the loss cone as a detector has been achieved using optical, x-ray and radar techniques and examples are given. Future programs will search for acceleration processes both for the trapped radiation and for auroral-producing precipitation. Beams injected from a long-range rocket or polar orbiting satellite may delineate the regions of open and closed field lines. Beams injected from geostationary orbit may be a powerful means of analyzing magnetospheric electrodynamics if detected and analyzed in the conjugate region in the polar ionosphere.

Keywords

Pitch Angle Plasma Sheet Auroral Zone Loss Cone Larmor Radius 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature References

  1. Arnoldy, R.L., and J.R. Winckler, The Hot Plasma Environment and Floating Potentials of an Electron-Beam-Emitting Rocket in the Ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 575, 1981.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashour-Abdalla, M., and C.F. Kennel, Diffuse Auroral Precipitation, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 30. 239, 1978.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernstein, W., H. Leinbach, P.J. Kellogg, S.J. Monson, and T. Hallinan, Further Laboratory Measurements of the Beam-Plasma Discharge, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 7271, 1979.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cannara, A.B., and F.W. Crawford, Electron-Beam-Probing Studies of Beam- Plasma Interactions. J. Appl. Phys., 38, 583, 1967.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cambou, F., U.S. Dokoukine, V.N. Ivchenko, G.G. Managadze, V.V. Migulin, O.K. Nazarenko, A.T. Nesmyanovitch, A.Kh. Pyatsi, R.Z. Sagdeev, and I.A. Zhulin, The Zarnitza Rocket Experiment of Electron Injection, Space Res., 15, 491, 1975.Google Scholar
  6. Cambou, F., V.S. Dokoukine, J. Lavergnat, R. Pellat, H. Reme, A. Saint-Marc, R.A. Sagdeev, I.A. Zhuline, General Description of the Araks Experiments, Ann. Geophys., 36, 271, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. Carr, T.D., and S. Gulkis, The Magnetosphere of Jupiter, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 7, 577, 1969.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cartwright, D.G., S.J. Monson, and P.J. Kellogg, Heating of the Ambient Ionosphere by an Artificially Injected Electron Beam, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 16, 1978.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, T.N., T.J. Hallinan, G.O. Mead, J.M. Mead, M.C. Trichel, and W.H. Hess, Artificial Aurora Experiment: Ground-based optical observation, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 6082, 1971.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, T.N., W.N. Hess, M.C. Trickel, E.M. Wescott, T.J. Hallinan, H.C. Stenbaek-Nielsen, and E.J.R. Maier, Artificial Aurora Conjugate to a Rocket-Borne Electron Accelerator, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 1722, 1980.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dechambre, M., Yu.V. Kushnerevsky, J. Lavergnat, R. Pellat, S.A. Pulinets, and V.V. Selegei, Waves Observed by the Araks Experiments: The Whistler Mode, Ann. Geophys., 36, 341, 1980.Google Scholar
  12. Getty, W.D., and L.D. Smullin, Beam-Plasma Discharge: Buildup of Oscillations, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 3421, 1963.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gringauz, K.I., N.M. Shutte, L.P. Smirnova, H. Reme, A. Saint-Marc, and J.M. Vigo, Natural Precipitation of Electrons and Effects Observed During the Operation of the Electron Gun During the Araks Experiments, Ann. Geophys., 36, 363, 1980.Google Scholar
  14. Gurnett, D.A., The Earth as a Radio Source: Terrestrial Kilometric Radiation, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 4227, 1974.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hallinan, T.J., H.C. Stenbaek-Nielsen, and J.R. Winckler, The Echo IV Electron Beam Experiment: Television Observation of Artificial Auroral Streaks Indicating Strong Beam Interactions in the High-Latitude Magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 3263, 1978.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hendrickson, R. A., The Electron Echo Experiment-Observations of the Charge Neutralization of the Rocket and Analysis of Echoes from Electrons Artificially Injected into the Magnetosphere, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Mn., 1972.Google Scholar
  17. Hendrickson, R.A., R.L. Arnoldy, and J.R. Winckler, Echo III: The Study of Electric and Magnetic Fields with Conjugate Echoes from Artificial Electron Beams Injected into the Auroral Zone Ionosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 3, 409, 1976.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hess, W.N., M.G. Trichel, T.N. Davis, W.C. Beggs, G.E. Kraft, E.Stassinopoulos and E.J.R. Maier, Artificial Auroral Experiment: Experiment and Principal Results, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 6067, 1971.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Israelson, G. A., and J.R. Winckler, Effect of a Neutral N (2) Cloud on the Electrical Charging of an Electron Beam-Emitting Rocket in the Ionosphere: Echo IV, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 1442, 1979.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacobsen, T. A., and N.C. Maynard, Polar 5 — An Electron Accelerator Experiment Within an Aurora. 3. Evidence for Significant Spacecraft Charging by an Electron Accelerator at Ionospheric Altitudes, Planet. Space Sci., 28, 291, 1980.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jost, R.J., H.R. Anderson, and J.O. McGarity, Measured Electron Energy Distributions During Electron Beam/Plasma Interactions, submitted to Geophys. Res. Lett., 1980.Google Scholar
  22. Kennel, C.F. Consequences of a Magnetospheric Plasma, Rev. Geophys. 7, 379, 1969.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leadabrand, R.L., M.J. Baron, J. Petriceks, and H.F. Bates, Chatanika, Alaska, Auroral Zone Incoherent Scatter Facility, Radio Sci., 7, 747, 1973.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyons, L.R., Electron Diffusion Driven by Magnetospheric Electrostatic Waves, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 575, 1974.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maehlum, B.N., K. Maseide, K. Aarsnes, A. Egeland, B. Grandal, J. Holtet, T.A. Jacobsen, N.C. Maynard, F. Soraas, J. Stadsnes, E.V. Thrane, and J. Troim, Polar 5 — An Electron Accelerator Experiment Within an Aurora. 1. Instrumentation and Geophysical Conditions, Planet. Space Sci., 28, 259, 1980.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McEntire, R. W., The Electron Echo Experiment: A Comparison Between the Observed and Predicted Trajectories of Electrons Artificially Injected into the Magnetosphere, Ph.D. Thesis, Sch. of Phys. and Astron., Univ. of Minn., Minneapolis, 1972.Google Scholar
  27. Mills, D.M., E.E. Abraham, and F.W. Crawford, Beam-Plasma Interactions with Transverse Modulation, J. Appl. Phys., 38, 4767, 1967.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mishin, E.V., and Yu.Ya. Ruzhin, Beam-Plasma Discharge During Electron Beam Injection in Ionosphere: Dynamics of the Region in Rocket Environment in ARAKS and Zarnitza 2 Experiments, Rep. 21a, b, Inst, of Terr. Magn., Ionos., and Radio Wave Propagat., Acad, of Sci. USSR, Moscow, 1978.Google Scholar
  29. Mishin, E. V., and Yu.Ya. Ruzhin, The Model of Beam-Plasma Discharge in the Rocket Environment During an Electron Beam Injection in the Ionosphere, Ann. Geophys., 36, 423, 1980.Google Scholar
  30. Monson, S.J., and P.J. Kellogg, Ground Observations of Waves at 2.96 MHz Generated by an 8- to 40-keV Beam in the Ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 121, 1978.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morgan, B.G., and R.L. Arnoldy, A Determination of F Region Convective Electric Fields From Rocket Measurements of Ionospheric Thermal Ion Spectra, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 1055, 1978.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olson, W.P. and K. A. Pfitzer, Magnetospheric Magnetic Field Modeling, Annual Scientific Report, Contract F44620–75-C-0033, McDonnel Douglas Astronautics Co., 5301 Bolsa Ave., Huntington Beach, California, 92647, 1977.Google Scholar
  33. ONeil, R.R., F. Bien, D. Bunt, J.A. Sandock, and A.T. Stair Jr., Summarized Results of the Artificial Auroral Experiment Precede, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 3273, 1978.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Neil, R.R., E.T.P. Lee, and E.R. Huppi, Auroral O (S) Production and Loss Processes: Ground-Based Measurements of the Artificial Auroral Experiment Precede, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 823, 1979.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paton, B.E., D.A. Dudko, V.N. Bernadsky, G.B. Asoyantz, Yu.N. Lankin, O.K. Nazarenko, V.D. Shelyagin, V.V. Pekker, V.V. Stesin, V.I. Kirienko, E.N. Bajshtruk, V.K. Mokhnach, Yu.V. Neporozhny, Yu.I. Drabovich, G.F. Pazeev, “A Powerful Electron Accelerator for Active Space Experiments”. Space Science Instrumentation, 4, (2–3), 131, 1978.ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. Pierce, J.R., Theory and Design of Electron Guns, D. vanNostrand Company, Inc., 1949.Google Scholar
  37. Pyatsi, A.Kh., and Yu.F. Zarnitsky Electron Precipitation in Magnetically Conjugated Region in the First Araks Experiment from Radar Data, Ann. Geophys., 36, 297, 1980.Google Scholar
  38. Roeder, J.L., W.R. Sheldon, J.R. Benbrook, E.A. Bering, and H. Leverenz, X-ray Measurements During the Araks Experiment, Ann. Geophys., 36, 401, 1980.Google Scholar
  39. Roederer, J. G., Dynamics of Geomagnetically Trapped Radiation, Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg (1970).Google Scholar
  40. Sellen, J.M. Jr., “AMPS Particle Accelerator Definition Study”, prepared for NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, TRW Systems Group, One Space Park, Redondo Beach, California, 1975.Google Scholar
  41. Swanson, R. L., Electron Intensity and Magnetic Field Changes at synchronous orbit for the auroral electrojet, M.S. thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Mn., 55455, 1978.Google Scholar
  42. Uspensky, M.V., E.E. Timopheev, and Yu. L. Sverdlov, “Araks” Doppler Radar Measurements of the Ionospheric Effects of Artificial Electron Beam in the North Hemisphere, Ann. Geophys., 36, 303, 1980.Google Scholar
  43. Walker, R. J., Quantitative Modeling of planetary fields, in Quantitative Modeling of Magnetospheric Processes, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., Vol. 21, edited by W.P. Olson, AGU, 1909 K Street, N.W., Washiongton, D.C., 20006, 1979.Google Scholar
  44. Wild, J.P., and S.F. Smerd, Radio Bursts from the Solar Corona, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 1599, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilhelm, K., W. Bernstein, and B. A. Whalen, Study of Electric Fields Parallel to the Magnetic Lines of Force Using Artificially Injected Energetic Electrons, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 415, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Winckler, J.R., R.L. Arnoldy, and R.A. Hendrickson, Echo II: A Study of Electron Beams Injected into the High-latitude Ionosphere from a Large Sounding Rocket, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 2316, 1975.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Winckler, J.R., The Application of Artificial Electron Beams to Magnetospheric Research, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 18, 659, 1980.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Winckler, J.R., Probing the Magnetosphere with Artificial Electron Beams, Adv. Space Res., 1, 17, 1981.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • John R. Winckler
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations