Biological Contributions to the Study of Learning
I never took a course from George Wischner. I was more fortunate. I had him as my adviser (Ray, 1959) and my friend. I could tell many George Wischner stories but will instead make only some general comments. As a graduate student, I was most impressed with two things about George. One was that he believed that graduate students were people and behaved that way, a most progressive attitude in the mid-1950s. We were invited to the parties at his home. That never happened with other faculty. The other characteristic that made an impact on me was his emphasis on doing it right: quality, not quantity. Sometimes, I would think it a bit much at the time, but in retrospect, it is the attention to detail and quality that saves most of us from ourselves. Those two features—a humanistic concern for people and a scientists’s concern for quality—combined to make him a unique and valuable member of the psychology department at the University of Pittsburgh. He was, and is, the compleat psychologist: clinician, researcher (both animal and human), teacher, and administrator. He had our love and respect then—he has it now.
KeywordsPsychoactive Drug Strain Difference F344 Animal Testosterone Propionate Brain Chemistry
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Goldman, L. The sexual behavior of adolescent and adult female rats treated with testosterone propionate in infancy. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1969.Google Scholar
- Joseph, R., Hess, S., and Birecree, E. Effects of hormone manipulations and exploration on sex differences in maze learning. Behavioral Biology, 1978, 24, 364–377.Google Scholar
- Ray, O. S. Tranquilizer effects as a function of experimental anxiety procedures. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Therapie, 1965, 153, 49–68.Google Scholar
- Ray, O. S. Behavioral analysis of drug actions. In P. Mantegazza and F. Piccinini (Eds.), Methods in drug evaluation. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1966.Google Scholar
- Ray, O. S. Drugs, society, and human behavior ( 2nd ed. ). St. Louis: Mosby, 1978.Google Scholar
- Ray, O. S., and Barrett, R. Interaction of learning and memory with age in the rat. In C. Eisdorfer and W. E. Fann (Eds.), Psychopharmacology and aging. New York: Plenum Press, 1974.Google Scholar
- Ray, O. S., and Barrett, R. Assessment of age related changes in learning and performance in the rat. In C. Eisdorfer and W. E. Fann (Eds.), Psychopharmacology and aging. New York: Spectrum Publications, 1980.Google Scholar
- Ray, O. S., and Bivens, L. W. Chlorpromazine and amphetamine effects on three operant and four discrete trial reinforcement schedules. Psychopharmacologia, 1966, 10, 23–43.Google Scholar
- Wittig, M. A., and Petersen, A. E. (Eds.). Sex related differences in cognitive functioning. New York: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar