Advertisement

Classification Style Differences in the Elderly

  • Mary W. Laurence
  • A. John Arrowood
Part of the Advances in the Study of Communication and Affect book series (ASCA, volume 8)

Abstract

Bruner’s (1966) suggestion that categorization skills are basic to a number of other cognitive operations—for example, concept formation, memory, problem solving—has been actively pursued in research with children (see Kagan & Kogan, 1970, for a review). Several recent studies have gone on to compare the classification skills of elderly persons with those of young adults (e.g., Cicirelli, 1976; Denney, 1974; Denney & Denney, 1973; Denney & Lennon, 1972; Kogan, 1974). Almost all have reported a diminished use among the elderly of classification based on conceptual category membership and an increase with age in the number of groupings in which there was no obvious similarity in the objects grouped together. These results have proceeded typically from a paradigm in which subjects are given only one opportunity to sort display material (geometric figures or pictures of familiar objects) into as many groupings as suggest themselves, but with the constraint that no single item can appear in more than one grouping.

Keywords

Elderly Group Familiar Object Hospital Group Grouping Percentage Categorization Skill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bruner, J. S. On cognitive growth. In J. S. Bruner, R. R. Olver, & P. M. Greenfield (Eds.), Studies in cognitive growth. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
  2. Cicirelli, V. G. Categorization behavior in aging subjects. Journal of Gerontology, 1976, 31, 676–690.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Denney, D. R., & Denney, N. W. The use of classification for problem solving: A comparison of middle and old age. Developmental Psychology, 1973, 9, 275–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Denney, N. W. Classification abilities in the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 1974, 29, 309–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Denney, N. W., & Lennon, M. L. Classification: A comparison of middle and old age. Developmental Psychology, 1972, 7, 210–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kagan, J., & Kogan, N. Individual variation in cognitive processes. In P. H. Müssen, Carmichaevs manual of child psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. Kirk, R. E. Experimental design procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/ Cole, 1968.Google Scholar
  8. Kogan, N. Categorization and conceptualizing styles in younger and older adults. Human Development, 1974, 17, 218–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Olver, R. R. A developmental study of cognitive equivalence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Radcliffe College, 1961.Google Scholar
  10. Olver, R. R., & Hornsby, J. R. On equivalence. In J. S. Bruner, R. R. Olver, & P. M. Greenfield (Eds.), Studies in cognitive growth. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary W. Laurence
    • 1
  • A. John Arrowood
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations