Skip to main content

Cellular Defense Systems of the Echinodermata

  • Chapter
Phylogeny and Ontogeny

Abstract

The echinoderms are of particular interest in phylogenetic studies because of their relatedness to the vertebrate subphylum. During the early Precambrian period, the animal kingdom is believed to have diverged into two major groups, known as the deuterostomes and the protostomes. Both the echinoderms and the vertebrates are deuterostomes, while all other invertebrates are classified as protostomes. The two groups are distinguished on the basis of major differences in early development, which may suggest that they were derived from different ancestors. “Protostome” is Greek for “mouth first” and in this group, the mouth is derived from the embryonic blastopore. The blastopore gives rise to the anus in deuterostomes (“mouth later”), while the mouth develops as a separate invagination. The pattern of cell cleavage also varies in the two groups. Cells are oriented in a spiral pattern in protostomes, whereas the blastomeres are positioned directly upon one another in the deuterostomes, resulting in a radial cleavage pattern. Early separation of the blastomeres in deuterostomes gives rise to complete individuals; this type of development is known as indeterminate cleavage. It does not occur in protostomes, where removal of blastomeres results in deformed embryos. Cleavage is said to be determinate in the latter case. During later development, the two groups also differ in formation of mesoderm and the coelomic cavity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bang, F. B., and Lemma, A., 1962, Bacterial infection and reaction to injury in some echinoderms, J. Insect. Pathol 4:401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertheussen, K., 1979, The cytotoxic reaction in allogeneic mixtures of echinoid phagocytes, Exp. Cell Res. 120:373.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertheussen, K., and Seljelid, R., 1978, Echinoid phagocytes in vitro, Exp. Cell Res. 111:401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Binyon, J., 1972, Physiology of Echinoderms, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boolootian, R. A., 1962, The perivisceral elements of echinoderm body fluids, Am. Zool. 2:275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boolootian, R. A., and Giese, A. C., 1958, Coelomic corpuscles of echinoderms, Biol. Bull. 115:53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boolootian, R. A., and Giese, A. C., 1959, Clotting of echinoderm coelomic fluid, J. Exp. Zool. 140:207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burnet, F. M., 1968, Evolution of the immune process in vertebrates, Nature (London) 218:426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chien, P. K., Johnson, P. T., Holland, N. D., and Chapman, F. A., 1970, The coelomic elements of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus). IV. Ultrastructure of the coelomocyfes, Protoplasma 71:419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffaro, K. A., 1978, Clearance of bacteriophage T4 in the sea urchin Lytechinus pictus, J. Invertebr. Pathol. 32:304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffaro, K. A., 1979, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffaro, K. A., and Hinegardner, R. T., 1977, Immune response in the sea urchin Lytechinus pictus, Science 197:1389.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuénot, L., 1888, Études anatomiques et morphologique sur les ophiures, Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén. Sér. 2 6:3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuénot, L., 1891, Études sur le sang et les glandes lymphatiques dans la série animale (2° parties: Invertébrés), Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén. Sér. 2 9:593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edds, K. T., 1977, Dynamic aspects of filopodial formation by reorganization of microfilaments, J. Cell Biol. 73:179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endean, R., 1958, The coelomocytes of Holothuria leucospilota, Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 99:47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endean, R., 1966, The coelomocytes and coelomic fluids, in: Physiology of Echinodermata (R. A. Boolootian, ed.), pp. 301–328, Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. C., 1966, Cell production in the Tiedemann bodies and haemal organs of the starfish, Asterias forbesi, Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 85:200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foettinger, A., 1880, Sur l’existence de l’hémoglobine chez les échinodermes, Arch. Biol. 1:405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, A. R., and Lambert, P., 1973, The fine structure of the haemocyte of the holothurian, Cucumaria miniata (Brandt), Can. J. Zool. 51:323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine, A. R., and Lambert, P., 1977, The fine structure of the leucocytes of the holothurian, Cucumaria miniata, Can. J. Zool. 55:1530.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hetzel, H. R., 1963, Studies on holothurian coelomocytes. I. A survey of coelomocyte types, Biol. Bull. 125:289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetzel, H. R., 1965, Studies on holothurian coelomocytes. II. The origin of coelomocytes and the formation of brown bodies, Biol. Bull. 128:102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildemann, W. H., and Dix, T. G., 1972, Transplantation reactions of tropical Australian echinoderms, Transplantation 15:624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildemann, W. H., Raison, R. L., Cheung, G., Hull, C. J., Akata, L., and Okamoto, J., 1977, Immunological specificity and memory in a scleractinian coral, Nature (London) 270:219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hildemann, W. H., Johnston, I. S., and Jokiel, P. L., 1979, Immunocompetence in the lowest metazoan phylum: Transplantation immunity in sponges, Science 204:420.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, N. D., Philips, J. H., and Giese, A. C., 1965, An autoradiographic investigation of coelomocyte production in the purple sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus), Biol. Bull. 128:259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, L., 1955, The Invertebrates: Echinodermata, the Coelomate Bilateria, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. T., 1969a, The coelomic elements of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus). I. The normal coelomocytes, their morphology and dynamics in hanging drops, J. Invertebr. Pathol. 13:25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. T., 1969b, The coelomic elements of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus). II. Cytochemistry of the coelomocytes, Histochemie 17:213.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. T., 1969c, The coelomic elements of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus). III. In vitro reaction to bacteria, J. Invertebr. Pathol. 13:42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. T., and Beeson, R. J., 1966, In vitro studies on Patria miniata (Brandt) coelomocytes, with remarks on revolving cysts, Life Sci. 5:1641.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. T., and Chapman, F. A., 1970a, Abnormal epithelial growth in sea urchin spines (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus), J. Invertebr. Pathol. 16:116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. T., and Chapman, F. A., 1970b, Infection with diatoms and other microorganisms in sea urchin spines (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus), J. Invertebr. Pathol. 16:268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneshiro, E. S., And Karp, R. D., 1980, The ultrastructure of coelomocytes of the sea star Dermasterias imbricata, Biol. Bull. 159:295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp, R. D., and Hildemann, W. H., 1976, Specific allograft reactivity in the sea star Dertnasterias imbricata, Transplantation 22:434.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karp, R. D., and Johns, J. D., 1978, Evolution of immune reactivity: Mitogenic responsiveness in the sea star Dermasterias imbricata, Abstracts, 78th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindred, J. E., 1924, The cellular elements in the perivisceral fluid of echinoderms, Biol. Bull. 46:228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, W., 1937, Die zellelemente in der Liebeshohlenflüssigheit des seeigels Psammechinus miliaris und ihr Bewegungsphysiologiches Verhalten, Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 27:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, R., and Wallenfels, K., 1940, Echinochrome als prosthetiche Gruppen hochmolekular symplex in den Eiern von Arbacia pustulosa, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 73:458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc, M., 1973, Étude ultrastructurale des réactions D’Asterina gibbosa (Échinoderme, Astéride) au niveau de l’organe axial après injection de protéines, Ann. Immunol. (Inst. Pasteur) 124C:363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman, E., 1950, The leucocytes of Arbacia punctulata, Biol. Bull 98:46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menton, D. N., and Eisen, A. Z., 1973, Cutaneous wound healing in the sea cucumber, Thyone briar eus, J. Morphol. 141:185.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, P. B., 1970, Coelomocyte aggregation in Cucumaria frondosa. Effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetate, adenosine, and adenosine nucleotides, Biol. Bull. 139:549.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reichensperger, A., 1912, Beiträge zur histologie und zum verlauf der regeneration bei crinoiden, Z. Wiss. Zool. 101:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinisch, C. L., and Bang, F. B., 1971, Cell recognition reactions of the sea star (Asterias vulgaris) to the injection of amebocytes of the sea urchin (Arbacia punctulata), Cell. Immunol. 2:496.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. C., 1978, A proposed phylogenetic relationship between sea cucumber polian vesicles and the vertebrate lymphoreticular system, J. Invertebr. Pathol. 31:353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stang-Voss, C., 1974, On the ultrastructure of invertebrate hemocytes: An interpretation of their role in comparative hematology, Contemp. Top. Immunobiol. 4:65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unkles, S. E., and Wardlaw, A. C., 1976, Antibacterial activity in the sea urchin Echinus esculentus, Soc. Gen. Microbiol. Proc. 3:182.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bossche, J. P., and Jangoux, M., 1976, Epithelial origin of starfish coelomocytes, Nature (London) 261:227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vethamany, V. G., and Fung, M., 1971, The fine structure of coelomocytes of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus drobachiensis (Muller O. F.), Can. J. Zool. 50:77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vevers, H. G., 1963, Pigmentation of the echinoderms, Proc. XIV Int. Congr. Zool. Washington D.C. 3:120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw, A. C., and Unkles, S. E., 1978, Bactericidal activity of coelomic fluid from the sea urchin Echinus esculentus, J. Invertebr. Pathol. 32:25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karp, R.D., Coffaro, K.A. (1982). Cellular Defense Systems of the Echinodermata. In: Cohen, N., Sigel, M.M. (eds) Phylogeny and Ontogeny. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4166-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4166-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-4168-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-4166-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics