Advertisement

Intimacy pp 427-442 | Cite as

Intimacy in the Supervisory Relationship

  • Michael H. Stone

Abstract

In contrast to psychopharmacology and other predominantly biologically based treatment approaches in psychiatry, where testable hypotheses can, with relative ease, be generated and validated, (verbal) psychotherapy remains more art than science. The number of relevant variables is staggering in both patient and therapist alike. The privacy demanded in the psychotherapeutic setting contraindicates all but the rarest of intrusions by a third party. Psychotherapy, itself an experience of intimacy, can be taught only by analogy — in the supervisory situation, itself a variety of intimate encounter. Therapists in training are occasionally required to permit a supervisor to be present at a session, or perhaps to carry out a diagnostic or prognostic evaluation, in his/her role as consultant. No supervisor has ever been present, even sitting quietly in the background, throughout the length and breadth of an extensive psychotherapy. Even the videotaping of a ten- or fifteen-session-long “brief psychotherapy” does not create a record of the customary unwitnessed therapeutic encounter. The Heisenberg principle of the observer affecting the observed is nowhere more in operation than in the realm of psychotherapy supervision. Psychotherapy and observed psychotherapy are comparable — but they are not the same. Similarly, supervision in the one-to-one situation and supervision where two or more trainees are present in the supervisor’s office are also comparable, but they can never be the same.

Keywords

Supervisory Relationship Base Treatment Approach Psychotherapy Supervision Supervisory Setting Personal Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gediman, H. K., & Wolkenfeld, F. The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis and supervision. Psychoanalysis Quarterly, 1980, 49, 234–255.Google Scholar
  2. Searles, H. F. The informational value of the supervisor’s emotional experience. Psychiatry, 1955, 18 135–146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Searles, H. F. Problems of psychoanalytic supervision. In Collected papers on schizophrenia and related subjects. New York: International Universities Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  4. Searles, H. F. Violence in schizophrenia. In Countertransference and related subjects:, New York: International Universities Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. Stone, M. H. Therapists’ personalities and unexpected success with schizophrenic patients. American journal of Psychotherapy, 1971, 25, 543–552.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Stone, M. H. Turning points in psychotherapy: Relationship to catastrophe theory. In S. Slipp (Ed.), Curative factors in Dynamic psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982.Google Scholar
  7. Whitman, R. M., Kramer, M., & Baldridge, B. J. Dreams about the patient. Journal of the American Psychoanalytical Association, 1969, 17, 702–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael H. Stone
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Connecticut Health CenterFarmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations