Advertisement

An Evaluation of Methods for the Determination of Organic and Elemental Carbon in Particulate Samples

  • S. H. Cadle
  • P. J. Groblicki

Abstract

Methods for separating and measuring organic and elemental carbon in particulate samples collected on filters are evaluated. Included in this evaluation are solvent extraction, nitric acid digestion, optical absorption, and various thermal techniques. Emphasis is placed on the measurement of ambient samples, but samples from diesel- and gasoline-fueled vehicles, as well as wood burning particulate, are also analyzed. It was found that all of the methods have limitations and must be applied carefully. The optical absorption techniques rely on a poorly determined absorption coefficient and are subject to interference by other species. Thermal methods are plagued by carbonization of organic material resulting in overestimation of elemental carbon and underestimation of organic carbon. Despite these problems, an extensive comparison of ambient samples from Denver showed excellent correlation between the various methods. Recommendations are presented for analyzing various sample types.

Keywords

Total Carbon Elemental Carbon Particulate Sample Thermal Method Steam Bath 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Grosjean, Anal. Chem., Vol. 47 (1975), p. 797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. R. Appel, P. Colodny, and J. J. Wesolowski, Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol. 10 (1976), p. 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. McCarthy and C. E. Moore, Anal. Chem., Vol. 24 (1952), p. 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. P. Kukreja and J. L. Bove, Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol. 10 (1976), p. 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. A. Pimenta and G. R. Wood, Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol. 14 (1980), p. 556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Puxbaum, Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem., Vol. 298 (1979), p. 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Puxbaum, Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem., Vol. 299 (1979), p. 33.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. L. Johnson and J. J. Huntzicker, In: Proceedings of Carbonaceous Particles in the Atmosphere Conference, T. Novakov, Ed., Lawrence Berkley Laboratory, Report 9037, (1979), pp. 10–13.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. L. Johnson, J. J. Shah, and J. J. Huntzicker, Presented at Conference on Sampling and Analysis of Toxic Organics in the Atmosphere, Boulder, CO, August (1979); ASTMGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. H. Cadle, P. J. Groblicki, and D. P. Stroup, Anal. Chem., Vol. 52 (1980), p. 2201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. L. Heisler, R. C. Henry, J. G. Watson, and G. M. Hidy, Environmental Research and Technology, Inc., Document P-5417–1, (1980), pp. C7 - C8.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. M. Smith, J. J. Griffin, and E. D. Goldberg, Anal. Chem., Vol. 47, (1975), p. 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Rosen, A. D. A. Hansen, L. Gundel, and T. Novakov, App. Optics, Vol. 17 (1978), p. 3859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. I. Lin, M. Baker, and R. J. Charlson, Appl. Optics, Vol. 12 (1973) p. 1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. E. Weiss, A. P. Waggoner, R. J. Charlson, D. L. Thorsell, J. S. Hall, and L. A. Riley, In: Proceedings of Carbonaceous Particles in the Atmosphere Conference, T. Novakov, Ed., Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Report 9037, (1979), pp. 257–262.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. G. Delumyea, L.-C. Chu, and E. S. Macias, Atmos. Environ., Vol. 14 (1980), p. 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. J. Truex and J. E. Anderson, Atmos. Environ., Vol. 13 (1979), p. 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. R. Faxvog and D. M. Roessler, J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 50 (1979), p. 7880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. L. Dod, H. Rosen, and T. Novakov, Atmospheric Aerosol Research Annual Report for 1977–1978, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories, Report 8696, pp. 2–10.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. J. Countess, G. T. Wolff, and S. H. Cadle, J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc., Vol. 30 (1980), p. 1194.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    N. A Kelly, G. T. Wolff, and M. A. Ferman, Atmos Environ.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. T. Wolff, N. A. Kelly, and M. A. Ferman, Science, Vol. 211 (1981), p. 703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. H. Cadle, G. J. Nebel, and R. L. Williams, SAE Transactions, Vol. 87 (1980), pp. 2381–2401.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    P. J. Groblicki, G. T. Wolff, and R. J. Countess, Atmos. Environ.. Vol. 15 (1981), p. 2473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. M. Roessler and F. R. Faxvog, J. Opt. Soc. Am., Vol. 70 (1980), p. 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    S. Ergun, J. T. McCartney, and R. E. Walline, Fuel, Vol. 40, (1961), p. 109.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. S. Sadler, M. S. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, (1979).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    W. R. Pierson and P. A. Russell, Atmos. Environ., Vol. 13 (1979), p. 1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. L. Williams and D. P. Chock, presented at International Symposium on Health Effects of Diesel Engine Emissions, Cincinnati, Ohio, December 1979; also available as General Motors Research Laboratories, Publication GMR-3177.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    G. T. Wolff, R. J. Countess, P. J. Groblicki, M. A. Ferman, S. H. Cadle, and J. L. Muhlbaier, Atmos. Environ., Vol. 15 (1981), p. 2485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    G. T. Wolff, P. J. Groblicki, S. H. Cadle, and R. J. Countess, These proceedings.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    J. L. Muhlbaier and R. L. Williams, These proceedings, p. 279.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. H. Cadle
    • 1
  • P. J. Groblicki
    • 1
  1. 1.General Motors Research LaboratoriesWarrenUSA

Personalised recommendations