Brain Organization and Taxonomic Relationships in Insectivora and Primates

  • Roland Bauchot


The brain’s anatomical criteria are seldom considered when systematicians determine the relationships of different taxa within a classification. This fact is as much because of the difficulties in studying these criteria as because of a strong anatomical stability shown by the brain. The conservatism is so strong that qualitative differences are not found either between species of the same genus or between genera of the same family. The only way to avoid this difficulty is to use quantitative methods that can show size differences that are not visible either macro- or microscopically. The need for a strict protocol and the amount of work necessary before results are obtained limit the numbers of this kind of study. Such problems, however, are not insurmountable.


Olfactory Bulb Brain Weight Brain Organization Tree Shrew Taxonomic Relationship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bauchot, R., 1963. L’architectonique comparée, qualitative et quantitative, du diencéphale des Insectivores. Mammalia, 27 (Suppl. 1):1–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauchot, R., 1966. Le développement phylogénétique du thalamus des Insectivores, In, Evolution of the Forebrain, R. Hassler and H. Stephan, eds., pp. 346-355.Google Scholar
  3. Bauchot, R., 1979a, Indices encéphaliques et distances interspécifiques chez les Insectivores et les Primates. I. Encéphale et télencéphale. Mammalia, 43:173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauchot, R., 1979b, Indices encéphaliques et distances interspécifiques chez les Insectivores et les Primates. II. Diencéphale et thalamus. Mammalia, 43:407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauchot, R., and Stephan, H., 1959. Le cerveau de Galemys pyrenaicus.Google Scholar
  6. Geoffroy 1811 (Insectivora Talpidae), et ses modifications dans l’adaptation à la vie aquatique. Mammalia, 23:1-18.Google Scholar
  7. Bauchot, R., and Stephan, H., 1966, Données nouvelles sur l’encéphalisation des Insectivores et des Prosimiens. Mammalia, 30:160–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauchot, R., and Stephan, H., 1968, Etude des modification encéphaliques observées chez les Insectivores adaptés à la recherche de nourriture en milieu aquatique. Mammalia, 32:228–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bauchot, R., and Stephan, H., 1969, Encéphalisation et niveau évolutif chez les Simiens. Mammalia, 33:225–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bauchot, R., and Stephan, H., 1970, Morphologie comparée de l’encéphale des Insectivores Tenrecidae. Mammalia, 34:514–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haeckel, E., 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, Berlin.Google Scholar
  12. Stephan, H., and Bauchot, R., 1968, Vergleichende Volumenuntersuchungen an Gehirnen europäischer Maulwürfe (Talpidae). J. f. Hirnforsch., 10:247–258.Google Scholar
  13. Stephan, H., Bauchot, R., and Andy, O.J., 1970. Data on size of the brain and of various parts in Insectivores and Primates. In, The Primate Brain. Advances in Primatology, 1, pp. 289-297.Google Scholar
  14. Tattersall, I., and Schwartz, J.H., 1975. Relationships among the Malagasy Lemurs: the craniodental evidence. In, Phylogeny of the Primates.A Multidisciplinary Approach, W.P. Luckett and F.S. Szalay, eds., pp. 299-312.Google Scholar
  15. Ward, J. H., 1963, Hierarchial grouping to optimize an objective function. S. Am. Stat. Assoc, 58:236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roland Bauchot
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Comparative NeuroanatomyUniversity of Paris 7Paris Cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations