Surface Modification for Improved Properties

  • Phillip A. Parrish
Part of the Sagamore Army Materials Research Conference Proceedings book series (SAMC, volume 26)


Almost every material in use today has a surface which is different from the material beneath the surface. For the most part, these surfaces play a useful role in the service life of the material. Such surface/bulk material combinations can be considered as composites, with surfaces ranging from a naturally occurring oxide layer protecting such metals as aluminum, titanium, and stainless steel to very deliberately tailored additions of alloying elements to attain specific desired properties, as in the cases of molecular beam epitaxy and ion implantation. In tailoring a surface, important common features are: 1) the specific property of the coating material itself, as influenced by composition and microstructure, 2) the interaction between the coating and the substrate, and 3) the problem of adhesion of the coating to the substrate, which is of utmost importance since the expected properties will be lost if the desired surface is removed. Figure 1 gives examples of phenomena which are affected by these three important features of coatings which must be addressed in any application.


Surface Modification Auger Electron Spectroscopy Blast Wave Improve Property Surface Analysis Technique 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. A. Somorjai, 1978, Surface Science, Sci, 201: 489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. F. Bunshah, 1978, “Deposition Technologies and Applications,” University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. S. Campbell, 1970, The Deposition of Thin Films by Chemical Methods, in: “Handbook of Thin Film Technology,” L. Maissel and R. Glang, eds., McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. M. Breinan, B. H. Kear, C. M. Banas, and L. E. Greenwald, 1976, Surface Treatment of Superalloys by Laser Skin Melting, in; “Superalloys: Metallurgy and Manufacture,” Proc. Third Intl. Symposium, Claitor, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. Ashworth, R. P. M. Proctor, and W. A. Grant, 1980, The Application of Ion Implantation to Aqueous Corrosion, in: “Treatise on Materials Science and Technology,” 18, J. K. Hirvonen, ed., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. A. Parrish, R. B. Benson, and S. Kim, The Influence of Ion Implanted Chromium on the Electrochemical Behavior of Iron In Aqueous Solutions, submitted to Corrosion.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. M. Myers, Implantation Metallurgy - Equilibrium Alloys, 1980, in: “Treatise on Materials Science and Technology,” 18, J. K. Hirvonen, ed., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. E. W. Hartley, 1975, Ion Implantation and Surface Modification in Tribology, Wear, 34: 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phillip A. Parrish
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Army Research OfficeResearch Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations