Who Is the Loser in Post-Harvest Losses?

  • Hans Guggenheim


Nutrition planning and post-harvest loss interventions are recognized as multidisciplinary endeavors that revolve around two critical questions. From the perspective of the nutrition planner, these are: (1) To what extent do post-harvest losses impact on the nutritional well-being of specific populations? (2) To what degree can the prevention of food losses during the postproduction food cycle improve the nutritional status of those in need?


Food Loss Loss Assessment Harvest Loss Aggregate Loss International Food Price 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Greeley, M. Background Paper for: Postharvest Food Losses in Developing Countries. Board on Science and Technology for International Development, Commission on International Relations. National Research Council/National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1978.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tagliacozzo, D. M. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Griff, A. L., and C. C. Reining. Social and cultural guidelines. In: Post-Harvest Grain Loss Assessment Methods, K. L. Harris and C. J. Lindblad (Eds.). American Association of Cereal Chemists, Office of Nutrition, U.S. AID, Washington, D.C., 1978.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spitz, P. Silent violence: Famine and inequality. Int. Soc. Sci. J. 30 (4): 1978.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Post-Harvest Crop Losses: The Nigerian Case. FAO, Rome, Italy, 1977.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fox, R. H. A Study of the Energy Expenditure of Africans Engaged in Various Rural Activities. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sen, A. K. Starvation and Exchange Entitlements: A General Approach and Its Application to the Great Bengal Famine. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO Committee on Agriculture, 5th Session, Rome, 18–27 April, 1979, W/G9089.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahluwia, M. Income inequality: Some dimensions of the problem. In: Redistribution with Growth, H. Chenery (Ed.), Oxford University Press, London, England, 1974.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morawetz, D. Twenty-Five Years of Economic Development, 1950–1975. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., 1977.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reutlinger, S., and M. Selowsky. The Anatomy of Hunger. World Bank Staff Occasional Paper, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guggenheim, H. Of millet, mice and men. In: World Food Losses, Pests, and the Environment, D. Pimentel (Ed.), Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1978.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harris, B. Relevant and Feasible Research. Economics Program, The International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Binswanger, H. P., N. S. Jodha, and B. C. Barah. The nature and significance of risk in the semi-arid tropics. In: Proceedings of a Workshop on Socioeconomic Constraints to Development of Semi-Arid Tropical Agriculture, ICRISAT, Hyderabad, India, February, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Guggenheim
    • 1
  1. 1.The Wunderman FoundationBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations