Advertisement

A Structural Modeling Approach to the Study of Attachment and Strange Situation Behaviors

  • J. P. Connell
  • H. Hill Goldsmith
Part of the Topics in Developmental Psychobiology book series (TDP)

Overview

The purpose of this chapter is to present a new methodological strategy for examining the organization of behaviors thought to reflect the attachment system. The structural modeling approach offers great promise for precise specification and evaluation of hypotheses concerning the organization and development of the parent—infant attachment bond. This approach is presented as an alternative to traditional methods of analyzing attachment behaviors, as represented by the ABC classification system (Ainsworth, Blehar, Waters, & Wall, 1978).

Keywords

Latent Variable Manifest Variable Discriminant Function Analysis Attachment Behavior Attachment System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. D. Patterns of attachment behaviors shown by the infant in interaction with his mother. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1964, 10, 51–58.Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M. D. S. Object relations, dependency and attachment: A theoretical review of the infant—mother relationship. Child Development, 1969, 40, 969–1025.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ainsworth, M. D. S. Infant—mother attachment. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 932–937.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Wittig, B. A. Attachment and exploratory behavior of one year olds in a strange situation. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), Determinants of infant behavior IV. London: Methuen, 1969.Google Scholar
  5. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Bell, S. M., & Stayton, D. J. Individual differences in the development of some attachment behaviors. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1972, 18, 123–143.Google Scholar
  6. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. Arend, R., Gove, F. L., & Sroufe, L. A. Continuity of individual adaptation from infancy to kindergarten: A predictive study of ego-resiliency and curiosity in preschoolers. Child Development, 1979, 50, 950–959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentler, P. M. The interdependence of theory, methodology and empirical data: Causal modeling as an approach to construct validation. In D. B. Kandel (Ed.), Longitudinal research on drug abuse: Empirical findings and methodological issues. New York: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
  9. Bischof, N. A. A systems approach toward the functional connections of attachment and fear. Child Development, 1975, 46, 801–817.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blehar, M. C., Lieberman, A. F., & Ainsworth, M. D. S. Early face to face interaction and itsrelation to later infant—mother attachment. Child Development, 1977, 48, 182–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolz, C. R. Typological theory and research. In R. B. Cattell & R. M Dreger (Eds.), Handbook of modern personality theory. Washington, D. C.: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1977.Google Scholar
  12. Bowlby, J. Attachment. New York: Basic Books, 1969.Google Scholar
  13. Bowlby, J. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
  14. Bowlby, J. Loss: Sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books, 1980.Google Scholar
  15. Cairns, R. Attachment and dependency: A psychobiological and social-learning synthesis. In L. Gewirtz (Ed.), Attachment and dependency. Washington, D. C.: V. H. Winston„ 1972.Google Scholar
  16. Connell, D. B. Individual differences in infant attachment: An investigation into stability, implications, and relationships to structure of early language development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1976.Google Scholar
  17. Connell, J. P., Goldsmith, H. H., & Buhrmester, D. Alternative approaches to the ABC classification system in the study of attachment. Paper presented at the meetings of the International Conference on Infant Studies, New Haven, Conn., March 1980.Google Scholar
  18. Connell, J. P., Goldsmith, H. H., & Gaensbauer, T. Relationships between dimensions of affect and attachment during separation and reunion episodes of the strange situation. Paper presented at the Developmental Psychobiology Research Group Conference, Estes Park, Col., May 1980.Google Scholar
  19. Gaensbauer, T., Schultz, L., & Connell, J. P. Contextual and temporal influences on the stability of affect and attachment behaviors in a modified strange situation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, April 1981.Google Scholar
  20. Gewirtz, J. L. Attachment, dependence, and a distinction in terms of stimulus control. In J. L. Gewirtz (Ed.), Attachment and dependency. Washington, D.C.: V. H. Winston, 1972.Google Scholar
  21. Goldberger, A. S. Structural equation models: An overview. In A. S. Goldberger & O. D. Duncan (Eds.) Structural equations models in the social sciences. New York: Seminar Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  22. Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. Perspectives on mathematical/statistical model building (MASMOB) in research on aging. In L. W. Poon (Ed.), Aging in the 1980’s: Psychological issues. Washington, D. C. American Psychological Association, 1980.Google Scholar
  23. Jöreskog, K. G. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1969, 34, 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. LISREL-IV: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: National Educational Resources, 1978.Google Scholar
  25. Kenny, D. A. Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley, 1979.Google Scholar
  26. Lamb, M. E. Quantitative aspects of mother— and father—infant attachment. Infant Behavior and Development, 1978, 1, 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maccoby, E. E., & Masters, J. C. Attachment and dependency, In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 2 ). New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
  28. Matas, L., Arend, R. A., & Sroufe, L. A. Continuity of adaption in the second year: The relationship between quality of attachment and later competence. Child Development, 1978, 49, 547–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spearman, C. The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan, 1927.Google Scholar
  30. Sroufe, L. A. The coherence of individual development: Early care, attachment, and subsequent developmental issues. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 10, 834–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sroufe, L. A., & Waters, E. Attachment as an organizational construct. Child Development, 1977, 48, 1184–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sroufe, L. A., & Waters, E. Attachment as an organizational construct. Child Development, 1977, 48, 1184–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thurstone, L. L. Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar
  34. Vaughn, B., Waters, E., Egeland, B., & Sroufe, L. A. Individual differences in infant—mother at-tachment at 12 and 18 months: Stability and change in families under stress, Child Develop-ment, 1979, 50, 4, 971–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vaughn, B., Egeland, B., & Sroufe, L. A. The coherence of maternal caregiving and the continuity of infant adaption in the first two years of life. Symposium presented at the meetings of the International Conference on Infant Studies, New Haven, Conn., March 1980.Google Scholar
  36. Waters, E. The reliability and stability of individual differences in infant—mother attachment. Child Development, 1978, 49, 483–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waters, E., Vaughn, B., & Egeland, B. Individual differences in infant—mother attchment relationships at age one: Antecedents in neo-natal behavior in an urban, economically disadvantaged sample. Child Development, 1980, 51, 1, 208–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Waters, E., Wippman, J., & Sroufe, L. A. Attachment, positive affect, and competence in the peer group: Two studies in construct validation. Child Development, 1979, 50, 821–829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Connell
    • 1
  • H. Hill Goldsmith
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of Education and Human Development and Department of PsychologyUniversity of RochesterNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations