Can Single Processes Explain Effects of Postnatal Influences on Primate Development?

  • Gene P. Sackett
Part of the Topics in Developmental Psychobiology book series (TDP)

Abstract

The modern study of behavioral development grew under the Freudian principle that early postnatal experience shapes adult human behavior. Later experience, although important for acquiring specific skills, abilities, and knowledge, does not have the primacy and permanence of early influences. This view was strengthened by Spitz (1945), who showed that human infants reared in institutions under deprived social and sensory conditions had markedly abnormal patterns of early development. Studies by Bowlby (1973) also suggested that infancy experience had a major influence on later attachment and social behavior. The pioneering experimental studies of Harry and Margaret Harlow (1965) on rhesus monkeys raised in total social isolation confirmed the results from these human studies. Rhesus isolates developed species-atypical individual and social behaviors which persisted into adulthood. With this nonhuman primate evidence, the theory that early experience is critical for species-typical primate behavior became a textbook fact.

Keywords

Estrogen Cage Testosterone Androgen Stim 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowlby, J. Separation: Anxiety and Anger. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, A. M., & Clark, A. D. Early experience: Myth and evidence. New York: Free Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Decarie, T. G. A study of the mental and emotional development of the thalidomide child. In G. M. Foss (Ed.), Determinants of infant behavior, Vol. I V. London: Methuen, 1969.Google Scholar
  4. Floeter M. K., & Greenough, W. T. Cerebellar plasticity: Modification of purkinje cell structure by differential rearing in monkeys. Science, 1979, 206, 227–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fuller, J. L. Experiential deprivation and later behavior. Science, 1967, 158, 1645–1652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gandelman, R., Von Saal, J. M., & Reinisch, J. M. Contiguity to male fetuses effects morphology and behavior of female mice. Nature, 1977 266, 722–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harlow, H. F., & Harlow, M. K. The affectional systems. In A. M. Schrier, H. F. Harlow, & F. Stollnitz (Eds.), Behavior of nonhuman primates, (Vol. 2 ). New York: Academic Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  8. Harlow, H. F., & Mears, C. The human model: Primate perspectives. New York: Wiley, 1979.Google Scholar
  9. Joffee, J. M. Prenatal determinants of behavior. New York: Pergamon Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  10. Maccoby, E. E., Doering, C. H., Jacklin, C. N., & Kraemer, H. Concentrations of sex hormones in umbilical-cord blood: Their relation to sex and birth order of infants. Child Development, 1979, 50, 632–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McKinney, W. T., Jr., Young, L. D., Suomi, S. J., & Davis, J. M. Chlorpromazine treatment of disturbed monkeys. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1973, 29, 490–494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Prescott, J. W. Early somatosensory deprivation as an ontogenetic process in the abnormal development of the brain and behavior. In E. I. Goldsmith & J. Moor-Jankowski (Eds.), Medical primatology. Basel: S. Karger, 1971.Google Scholar
  13. Resko, J. A. Androgen secretion by the fetal and neonatal rhesus monkey. Endocrinology, 1970, 87, 680–687.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Resko, J. A., Ploem, J. G., & Stradelman, E. L. Estrogens in fetal and maternal plasma of the rhesus monkey. Endocrinology, 1975, 97, 425–430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sackett, G. P. Effects of rearing conditions upon the behavior of rhesus monkeys. Child Development, 1965, 36, 855–868.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sackett, G. P. Isolation rearing in monkeys: Diffuse and specific effects on later behavior. In R. Chauvin (Ed.), Animal models of human behavior. Paris: Colloques Internationaux du C.N.R.S., 1972.Google Scholar
  17. Sackett, G. P. Receiving severe aggression correlates with fetal gender in pregnant pigtail monkeys. Developmental Psychobiology, 1981, 14, 267–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sackett, G. P., Holm, R. A., & Landesman-Dwyer, S. Vulnerability for abnormal development: Pregnancy outcomes and sex differences in macaque monkeys. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Aberrant development in infancy. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1975.Google Scholar
  19. Sackett, G. P., Holm, R. A., & Ruppenthal, G. C. Social isolation rearing: Species differences in behavior of macaque monkeys. Developmental Psychology, 1976, 12, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sackett, G. P., Ruppenthal, G. C., Fahrenbruch, C., Holm, R. A., & Greenough, W. T. Genotype determines social isolation rearing effects in monkeys. Developmental Psychology, 1981, 17, 313–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sameroff, A. J. Organization and stability of newborn behavior: A commentary on the Brazelton Neonatal Behavior Assessment Scale. Child Development Monographs,1978, Number 177.Google Scholar
  22. Streissguth, A. P., Landesman-Dwyer, S., Martin, J., & Smith, D. W. Teratogenic effects of alco hol in humans and laboratory animals. Science, 1980, 209, 353–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Suomi, S. J., & Harlow, H. F. Social rehabilitation of isolate-reared monkeys. Developmental Psychology, 1972, 6, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spitz, R. Hospitalism: An inquiry into the genesis of psychiatric conditions in early childhood. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1945, 1, 53–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gene P. Sackett
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Regional Primate Research Center, and Child Development and Mental Retardation CenterUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations