Motility Studies of Large Cells

  • F. Ross Hallett
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSB, volume 73)


Most of us in the light scattering discipline are familiar with the general characteristics of autocorrelation functions obtained from motile cells. First of all the decay times of these functions are 10 to 100 times shorter than would be expected from diffusing particles of the same size. Secondly the functions, especially those determined at low scattering angles, exhibit a shoulder in the first few channels before they tail off to background. Beyond this, however, there is a tremendous variation in decay times and shapes of correlation functions from one motile system to the next. In the case of bull spermatozoa one often sees significant changes from one sample to the next. Figure 1 shows the electric field autocorrelation functions (dots) from four different bull semen samples. Over the years we have learned that the source of these variations is the presence of differing relative populations of three classes of spermatozoa within the samples. The first class is most common, namely the normal motile spermatozoa. These cells are beautiful to watch by slow motion cinematography.


Motility Study Motile Spermatozoon Motile Cell Translational Speed Defective Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Rikmenspoel, G. van Herpen, and J. Eijkhout, Cinematographic observations of the movement of bull sperm cells, Phys. Med. Biol. 5:167–181 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Holz and S.-H. Chen, Rotational-translational models for interpretation of quasi-electric light scattering spectra of motile bacteria, Appl. Opt. 17:3197–3204 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Craig, F. R. Hallett, and B. Nickel, Quasi-elastic light-scattering spectra of swimming spermatozoa: rotational and translational effects, Biophys. J. 28:457–472 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. van Duijn, Jr. and C. van Voorst, Precision measurements of dimensions, refractive index, and mass of bull spermatozoa in the living state, Mikroscopie 27:142–167 (1971).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Craig, op. cit.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Herpigny and J.-P. Boon, Photon correlation study of spermatozoa motility, J. de Physique 40:1085–1088 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Craig, op. cit.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Ross Hallett
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations