Advertisement

Extrapolation from Long Term Low Dose Animal Studies — II. The ED01 Study

  • M. F. Cranmer
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 21)

Abstract

A Pilot Study in which 2AAF was administered in the feed of male and female C57/B6 and BALB/c mice for eighteen months established the suitability of the strain and sex and provided for prediction of the dosage-time range used in the ED01 Study. The results of the pilot study have been published elsewhere (8). Based on the Pilot Study results, the main objective, that is the validation of a chemical carcinogen dose-response curve to permit extrapolation from high to low levels of response, was determined to be achievable.

Keywords

Bladder Cancer Liver Tumor Bladder Tumor Bladder Carcinoma Reticulum Cell Sarcoma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cranmer, M.F., (1974): Reflections in Toxicology. Journal of Washington Academy of Sciences 64(2): 158–179.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cranmer, M.F., (1976): Advances in animal care techniques at NCTR. Laboratory Animal Science, 26(2)(II):355–373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cranmer, M.F., Herrick, S.S., Lawrence, L.R., Konvicka, A.J. and Taylor, D.W., (1976): Research data integrity: A result of an integrated information system. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 2:285–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cranmer, M.F., Lawrence, L.R., Konvicka, A.J., and Herrick, S.S., (1978): NCTR computer systems designed for toxicologie experimentation, I. Overview. Journal of Environmental Pathology and Toxicology, 1:543–549.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cranmer, M.F., (1979): The design criteria and application of dose response relationships to interpretation of carcinogenesis bioassay. Regulatory Aspects of Carcinogenesis and Food Additives: The Delaney Clause. Academic Press, 147-172.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crump, K.S., Guess, H.A., and Deal, K.L., (1977): Confidence intervals and test of hypotheses concerning dose response relations inferred from animal carcinogenicity data. Biometrics 33:437–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoel, D.G., Gaylor, D.W., Kirschstein, R.L., Saffiotti, U. and Schneiderman, M.A., (1975): Estimation of risks irreversible, delayed toxicity. J. Toxicol. Environ. Hlth., 1:133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Littlefield, N.A., Cueto, C., Jr., Davis, A.K. and Medlock, K., (1975): Chronic dose-response studies in mice fed 2-AAF. J. Tox. & Environ. Hlth., 1:25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Littlefield, N.A., Greenman, D.L., and Farmer, J.H., (1979): Effects of continuous and discontinued exposure to 2-AAF on urinary bladder hyperplasia and neoplasia. J. Environ. Path. & Tox. 3:35–54.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Staffa, J.E. and Mehlman, M.A., eds., (1980): Innovations in cancer risk assessment (ED01 study). J. Environ. Path. Toxicol. 3 No. 3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. F. Cranmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Jefferson Professional ServicesLittle RockUSA

Personalised recommendations