What is the Total Risk of Energy Systems?
Although the toxicity of substances plays a large part in determining their effect on human health, much of the damage to health from producing energy comes from sources other than toxicity. Both toxic and non- toxic effects should be considered in calculating this damage. This paper will (a) discuss occupational disease in generating energy, (b) outline briefly the major sources of risk (defined as loss of health or death) in its production, and (c) review some of the calculations and rankings which either appear in or are deducible from the literature.
KeywordsEnergy System Coal Mining Solar Panel Solar Collector Occupational Disease
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.S. H. Schurr et al., “Energy in America’s Future: The Choice Before Us”, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland (1979).Google Scholar
- 2.“Occupational Injuries and Illnesses in the United States, By Industry, 1973”, Bureau of Labour Statistics, Washington, D.C., 1975.Google Scholar
- 4.“Problems involved in Developing an Index of Harm”, ICRP Publication No. 27, Pergamon Press, London (1977), p.21.Google Scholar
- 5.Health and Safety Commission, “The Hazards of Conventional Sources of Energy”, HMSO London (1978), p. 28.Google Scholar
- 7.S. C. Morris, K. M. Novak and L. D. Hamilton, “Databook for the Quantitation of Health Effects from Coal Energy Systems (Preliminary Draft)”, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, N.Y. (May 1979), p. 20.Google Scholar
- 9.H. Inhaber, “Risk of Energy Production”, Atomic Energy Control Board, Ottawa, Canada (March-Nov. 1978), Report AECB 1119, three editions.Google Scholar
- 10.Also found by T. Donakowski, Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago (private communication).Google Scholar
- 11.Ref. 9, op. cit., Appendix L.Google Scholar
- 12.“Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants”, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. (1975), Report WASH-1400.Google Scholar
- 13.Federal Minister of Research and Technology, “German Risk Study: Summary”, Gesellschaft für Reaktorsicherheit, Cologne, Federal Republic of Germany (August, 1979), p. 39.Google Scholar
- 14.Nucleonics Week, April 26, 1979, p. 17.Google Scholar
- 15.Ad Hoc Population Dose Assessment Group, “Population Dose and Health Impact of the Accident at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station”, Bureau of Radiological Health, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Rockville, Maryland (May 10, 1979).Google Scholar
- 16.W. Ramsay, “Small-Scale Energy Technologies”, draft prepared for National Energy Strategies Project, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C. (June 1978), p. 18-93.Google Scholar
- 17.“High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Alternatives”, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C., (1974), Report WASH-1297; R. C. Erdmann et al, “Status Report on the EPRI Fuel Cycle Accident Risk Assessment,” Science Applications Inc., Palo Alto, Cal. (July 1979), Report NP-1128, p. 1-4.Google Scholar
- 18.S. V. Szokolay, “Solar Energy and Building”, second edition, John Wiley, New York, (1977).Google Scholar
- 19.“Energy Requirements of a Solar Heating System”, National Research Council, Ottawa (Feb. 1979), Report EPO-79-1.Google Scholar
- 20.As reported in Oak Ridge Review, 12 20 (1979).Google Scholar