What is the Total Risk of Energy Systems?

  • Herbert Inhaber
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 21)


Although the toxicity of substances plays a large part in determining their effect on human health, much of the damage to health from producing energy comes from sources other than toxicity. Both toxic and non- toxic effects should be considered in calculating this damage. This paper will (a) discuss occupational disease in generating energy, (b) outline briefly the major sources of risk (defined as loss of health or death) in its production, and (c) review some of the calculations and rankings which either appear in or are deducible from the literature.


Energy System Coal Mining Solar Panel Solar Collector Occupational Disease 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. H. Schurr et al., “Energy in America’s Future: The Choice Before Us”, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland (1979).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    “Occupational Injuries and Illnesses in the United States, By Industry, 1973”, Bureau of Labour Statistics, Washington, D.C., 1975.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. E. Pochin, The Acceptance of Risk, British Medical Bulletin, 31 (3) 184 (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    “Problems involved in Developing an Index of Harm”, ICRP Publication No. 27, Pergamon Press, London (1977), p.21.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Health and Safety Commission, “The Hazards of Conventional Sources of Energy”, HMSO London (1978), p. 28.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. L. Comar and L. A. Sagan, Health Effects of Energy Production and Conversion, Annual Review of Energy 1 581 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. C. Morris, K. M. Novak and L. D. Hamilton, “Databook for the Quantitation of Health Effects from Coal Energy Systems (Preliminary Draft)”, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, N.Y. (May 1979), p. 20.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Inhaber, Risk with Energy from Conventional and Non-Conventional Sources, Science, 203 718 (Feb. 23, 1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Inhaber, “Risk of Energy Production”, Atomic Energy Control Board, Ottawa, Canada (March-Nov. 1978), Report AECB 1119, three editions.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Also found by T. Donakowski, Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago (private communication).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ref. 9, op. cit., Appendix L.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    “Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants”, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. (1975), Report WASH-1400.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Federal Minister of Research and Technology, “German Risk Study: Summary”, Gesellschaft für Reaktorsicherheit, Cologne, Federal Republic of Germany (August, 1979), p. 39.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nucleonics Week, April 26, 1979, p. 17.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ad Hoc Population Dose Assessment Group, “Population Dose and Health Impact of the Accident at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station”, Bureau of Radiological Health, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Rockville, Maryland (May 10, 1979).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Ramsay, “Small-Scale Energy Technologies”, draft prepared for National Energy Strategies Project, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C. (June 1978), p. 18-93.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    “High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Alternatives”, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C., (1974), Report WASH-1297; R. C. Erdmann et al, “Status Report on the EPRI Fuel Cycle Accident Risk Assessment,” Science Applications Inc., Palo Alto, Cal. (July 1979), Report NP-1128, p. 1-4.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. V. Szokolay, “Solar Energy and Building”, second edition, John Wiley, New York, (1977).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    “Energy Requirements of a Solar Heating System”, National Research Council, Ottawa (Feb. 1979), Report EPO-79-1.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    As reported in Oak Ridge Review, 12 20 (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herbert Inhaber
    • 1
  1. 1.Atomic Energy Control BoardOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations