Advertisement

Fragile Knowledge and Stubborn Ignorance

Agenda for the Study of Violence
  • John P. Conrad
Part of the The Hastings Center Series in Ethics book series (HCSE)

Abstract

Why should violence be a subject for research? Only during the last century has it inspired the application of the scientific method. For all the preceding millennia, violence has punctuated human existence without being considered a topic for empirical study. It was extolled by epic poets as the ultimate test of masculine virtue, it was denounced by prophets and moralists, it was endured by ordinary people as a natural risk in the human condition. All these responses to the infliction of physical harm by men upon each other persist to the present time. Until the angry stay their hands, the brave will be praised, the cowards will be scorned, and the brutes will be hated.

Keywords

Criminal Justice Capital Punishment Criminal Justice System Crime Rate Violent Crime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 5.
    Simon Dinitz, Stuart Miller, and John P. Conrad, The Career of Violence (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1982), (in preparation).Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    Donna Martin Hamparian et al. The Violent Few (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1978), pp. 56–68.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    Marvin E. Wolfgang, Robert M. Figlio, and Thorsten Sellin, Delinquency in a Birth Cohort (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972), pp. 130–150.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    James Q. Wilson, Thinking about crime (New York: Basic Books, 1974), pp. 208–209).Google Scholar
  5. See also Ernest van den Haag, Punishing Criminals: Concerning an Old and Painful Subject (New York: Basic Books, 1975), pp. 248–249.Google Scholar
  6. 10.
    Charles E. Silberman, Criminal Justice, Criminal Violence (New York: Random House, 1978), p. 120.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    Stephan Van Dine, John P. Conrad, and Simon Dinitz, Restraining the Wicked (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1979).Google Scholar
  8. 14.
    Immanuel Kant, “The General Theory of Justice”, In The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, trans. John Ladd (New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965), pp. 102–107. Although most readers are repelled by Kant’s vigorously uncompromising advocacy of capital punishment for murder, his exposition of the logic of retributivism is still a lucid and uncluttered analysis and deserves to be considered as a line of reasoning opposed to the utilitarianism that was developing at that time and of which Kant scathingly disapproved.Google Scholar
  9. 15.
    Robert Graham Caldwell, Red Hannah, Delaware’s Whipping Post (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1974).Google Scholar
  10. 17.
    Paul Meehl, Clinical versus Statistical Prediction (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 18.
    Kurt Goldstein, “The Effect of Brain Damage on the Personality”, Psychiatry 15 (1952): 245–260.Google Scholar
  12. 20.
    See Edwin H. Sutherland and Donald R. Cerssey, Principles of Criminology, 6th ed. (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1960), pp. 74–80.Google Scholar
  13. 21.
    Albert K. Cohen, Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1953).Google Scholar
  14. 22.
    Wolfgang, Marvin E. and Ferracuti, Franco. The Subculture of Violence. (London: Tavistock Publications, 1967).Google Scholar
  15. 23.
    Eliot Liebow, Tally’s Corner (Boston: Little, Brown, 1967).Google Scholar
  16. 24.
    James Patrick [pseud.] A Glasgow Gang Observed (London: Eyre, Methuen, 1973).Google Scholar
  17. 25.
    D. J. West and D. P. Farrington, The Delinquent Way of Life (London: Heinemann, 1977).Google Scholar
  18. D. J. West and D. P. Farrington, West and Farrington’s Who Becomes Delinquent? (London: Heinemann, 1973).Google Scholar
  19. 27.
    David J. Rothman, “Behavior Modification in Total Institutions”, The Hastings Center Report 5 (February 1975): 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Hastings Center 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Conrad
    • 1
  1. 1.The American Justice InstituteSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations