Advertisement

Reinforcement Theory Strategies for Modifying Transit Ridership

  • Peter B. Everett
Part of the Human Behavior and Environment book series (HUBE, volume 5)

Abstract

The predominance of the single-occupancy private automobile as the major urban transportation mode has led to many well-recognized problems. The private car uses 27% of the nation’s annual consumption of petroleum and natural gas (Sokolsky, 1979). It is the most significant contributor to urban pollution and congestion. The road systems designed to accommodate the private car have disrupted the social fabric of many neighborhoods (Leavitt, 1970), and there is good evidence that they have determined the size, shape, and character of many urban areas (Chapin, 1968). Finally, the overreliance on a single transportation mode has forced a certain component of our population (the elderly, the young, the poor, the handicapped) to be truly deprived of mobility as options other than the private car are simply not available.

Keywords

Travel Behavior Central Business District Public Transit Apply Behavior Analysis Transit System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chapin, F. S., Jr. Taking stock of techniques for shaping urban growth. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1968, 29, 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Connor, D. L. Findings of preliminary analyses of the Trenton, New Jersey off-peak fare-free transit demonstration. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1979, NTIS 52-0001-79-1.Google Scholar
  3. Deslauriers, B. C. A behavioral analysis of transportation: Some suggestions for mass transit. High Speed Ground Transportation Journal, 1975, 9, 13–20.Google Scholar
  4. Deslauriers, B. C, & Everett, P. B. Effects of intermittent and continuous token reinforcement on bus ridership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Everett, P. B. Use of the reinforcement procedure to increase bus ridership. Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1973, 8 (Pt. 2), 891–892.Google Scholar
  6. Everett, P. B., & Hayward, S. C. Behavioral technology—An essential design component of transportation systems. High Speed Ground Transportation Journal, 1974, 8, 139–143.Google Scholar
  7. Everett, P. B., Hayward, S. C, & Meyers, A. W. Effects of a token reinforcement procedure on bus ridership. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1974, 7, 1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Everett, P. B., Anderson, V. B., & Makranczy, U. Transit route pamphlets: Do they work? Transit Journal, 1977, 3, 59–70.Google Scholar
  9. Everett, P. B., Deslauriers, B. C., Newsom, T., & Anderson, V. B. The differential effect of two free ride dissemination procedures on bus ridership. Transportation Research, 1978, 12, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Everett, P. B., Gurtler, M. D., & Hildebrand, M. G. Free Transit: How Much—How Long? Transportation Research, In press.Google Scholar
  11. Foxx, R. M., & Hake, D. F. Gasoline conservation: A procedure for measuring and reducing the driving of college students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977, 10, 61–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodman, K. M., & Green, M. A. Low fare, free fare transit. Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA), Feb. 1977, NTIS 52-0002-77-1.Google Scholar
  13. Leavitt, H. Superhighway — superhoax. New York: Doubleday, 1970.Google Scholar
  14. Lockwood, S. C. TSM planning — An emerging process. In G. E. Grey & L. A. Hoel (Eds.), Public transportation: Planning, operations, and management. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1979, pp. 354–381.Google Scholar
  15. Lundberg, U. Urban commuting crowdedness and catecholamine secretion. Journal of Human Stress, 1976, 2, 26–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Recker, W. W., & Stevens, R. F. Attitudinal models of modal choice: The multinomial case for selected network trips. Transportation, 1976, 5, 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Skinner, B. F. Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1953.Google Scholar
  18. Skinner, B. F. Contingencies of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.Google Scholar
  19. Slater, J. S. & Watson, B. G. Psychological and physiological indicators of stress in various travel and commuting modes. Unpublished masters paper, The Pennsylvania State University, May, 1980.Google Scholar
  20. Sokolsky, S. Energy: Case studies. In G. E. Grey & L. A. Hoel (Eds.), Public transportation: Planning, operations, and management. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1979. pp. 550–562.Google Scholar
  21. Swan, S., & Knight, R. Denver off-peak free fare public transit experiment (interim report). UMTA, May 1979, NTIS 06-0010-79-1.Google Scholar
  22. Weiglin, P. C. Marketing and the management attitude. Transit Journal, 1975, 2, 35–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter B. Everett
    • 1
  1. 1.Program in Man-Environment Relations, The Pennsylvania Transportation InstituteThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations