Advertisement

Psychological Contributions to Travel Demand Modeling

  • Irwin P. Levin
  • Jordan J. Louviere
Part of the Human Behavior and Environment book series (HUBE, volume 5)

Abstract

The area of travel demand modeling has traditionally been concerned with assessing the determinants of current travel patterns, predicting changes in these patterns as a function of projected changes in transportation systems, and developing more efficient transportation systems based on users’ needs and preferences. The concept of a demand for travel is essentially an economic one: Travel is rarely valued for its own sake; rather, it is valued as a means of attaining some other end. Theoretically, it should be possible to map out the quantities of travel that are purchased at each of a range of prices. Normative planning goals could then be achieved by setting supply of transportation and demand for transportation in equilibrium. Although this is an attractive concept, firmly grounded in the well-developed area of consumer theory in economics, a range of problems plagues most attempts to put it into operation in transportation planning. Indeed, research in the general area of travel demand modeling has been moving rapidly toward theory and methods that may be broadly viewed as attempts to develop explanations of human travel behavior, in general, and human travel choices, in particular. As will be described in this chapter, such research relies heavily on the contributions of psychological measurement and modeling.

Keywords

Transportation Research Mode Choice Travel Behavior Travel Demand Travel Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 888–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology. Worcester, Mass.: Clark University Press, 1935, pp. 798–844.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, N. H. Information integration theory: A brief survey. In Krantz, D. H., Atkinson, R. C., Luce, R. D., and Suppes, P. (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. 2). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, N. H. Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 153–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, N. H. How functional measurement can yield validated interval scales of mental qualities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 677–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, N. H. Introduction to cognitive algebra. Technical Report No. 85, Center for Human Information Processing, University of California, San Diego, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, N. H., & Shanteau, J. Weak inference with linear models. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 1155–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ben-Akiva, M. Structure of passenger demand models. Transportation Research Record 526, 1974.Google Scholar
  9. Burnett, K. P. Data problems in the application of conjoint measurement to recurrent urban travel. In R. G. Golledge & J. Rayner (Eds.), Data analysis in multidimensional scaling. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, in press.Google Scholar
  10. Burnett, P. The dimensions of alternatives in spatial choice processes. Geographical Analysis, 1973, 5, 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnett, P. Toward dynamic models of traveler behavior and point pattern of traveler origins. Economic Geography, 1976, 52, 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cadwallader, M. Behavioral model of consumer spatial decision making. Economic Geography, 1975, 51, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, D. T. Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 1969, 24, 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carrothers, G. A. P. An historical review of gravity and potential concepts of human interaction. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1956, 22, 94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Curry, D. J., Levin, I. P., & Gray, M. J. A comparison of additive conjoint measurement and functional measurement in a study of apartment preferences. Technical Report #98, Institute of Urban and Regional Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 1978.Google Scholar
  16. Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dial, R. B. A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment model which obviates path enumeration. Transportation Research, 1971, 5, 83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dobson, R. Uses and limitations of attitudinal modeling. In P. R. Stopher & A. H. Meyburg (Eds.), Behavioral travel-demand models. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books (Heath), 1976, 99–106.Google Scholar
  19. Dobson, R., & Kehoe, J. F. Disaggregated behavioral views of transportation attributes. Transportation Research Record 527, 1974, 1-15.Google Scholar
  20. Dobson, R., & Tischer, M. L. Perceptual market segmentation technique for transportation analysis. Transportation Research Record 673, 1978, 145-152.Google Scholar
  21. Dobson, R., Golob, T. F., & Gustafson, R. L. Multidimensional scaling of consumer preferences for a public transportation system: An application of two approaches. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1974, 8, 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Donnelly, E. P. Formulation and evaluation of alternative state transit operating assistance programs: A quantitative preference technique. Preliminary Research Report #90, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, 1975.Google Scholar
  23. Donnelly, E. P., Howe, S. M., & Des Champs, J. A. Trade-off analysis: Theory and applications to transportation policy planning. Preliminary Research Report #103, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, 1976.Google Scholar
  24. Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  25. Fishbein, M. Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: Wiley, 1967.Google Scholar
  26. Golob, T. F., Canty, E. T., & Gustafson, R. L. An analysis of consumer preferences for a public transportation system. Transportation Research, 1972, 6, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Golob, T. F., Horowitz, A. D., & Wachs, M. Attitude-behavior relationships in travel demand modeling. In D. A. Hensher & P. R. Stopher (Eds.), Behavioural travel modelling. London: Croom Helm, 1979, pp. 739–757.Google Scholar
  28. Hartgen, D. T. The influence of attitudinal and situational variables on urban mode choice. Preliminary Research Report #41, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
  29. Hartgen, D. T., & Tanner, G. H. Investigations of the effect of traveler attitudes in a model of mode choice behavior. Transportation Research Record 369, 1971, 1-14.Google Scholar
  30. Hauser, J. R., & Koppelman, F. S. Designing transportation services: A marketing approach. Working Paper No. 414-416, The Transportation Center, Northwestern University, 1976.Google Scholar
  31. Hensher, D. A., McLeod, P. B., & Stanley, J. K. Usefulness of attitudinal measures in investigating the choice of travel mode. International Journal of Transport Economics, 1975, 2, 51–75.Google Scholar
  32. Hill, D. M., & von Cube, H. G. Development of a model for forecasting travel mode choice in urban areas. Highway Research Record 38, 1963, 78-96.Google Scholar
  33. Horowitz, J. A utility maximizing of the demand for multi-destination nonwork travel. CTS Working Paper No. 79-9, Cambridge, Mass., 1979.Google Scholar
  34. Horton, F., & Louviere, J. J. Behavioral analysis and transportation planning: Inputs to transit planning. Transportation, 1974, 8, 165–181.Google Scholar
  35. Horton, F., & Reynolds, D. R. Effects of urban spatial structures on individual behavior. Economic Geography, 1971, 49, 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Keeney, R., & Raiffa, H. Decisions among multiple objectives: Preference and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  37. Kiesler, C. A. The psychology of commitment: Experiments linking behavior to belief. New York: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  38. Koppelman, F. S., & Hauser, J. R. Destination choice behavior for non-grocery-shopping trips. Transportation Research Record 673, 1978, 157-165.Google Scholar
  39. Krantz, D. H., Luce, R. D., Suppes, P., & Tversky, A. Foundations of measurement: Vol. 1. Additive and polynomial representations. New York and London: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  40. Kruskal, J. B. Analysis of factorial experiments by estimating monotone transformations of the data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 1965, 27, 251–263.Google Scholar
  41. Lerman, S. R., & Louviere, J. J. Using functional measurement to identify the form of utility functions in travel demand models. Transportation Research Record 673, 1978, 78-86.Google Scholar
  42. Levin, I. P. Information integration in transportation decisions. In M. F. Kaplan & S. Schwartz (Eds.), Human judgment and decision processes in applied settings. New York: Academic Press, 1977, pp. 57–81.Google Scholar
  43. Levin, I. P. The development of attitudinal modelling approaches in transportation research. In D. A. Hensher & P. R. Stopher (Eds.), Behavioural travel modelling. London: Croom Helm, 1979, pp. 758–581.Google Scholar
  44. Levin, I. P., & Gray, M. J. Evaluation of interpersonal influences in the formation and promotion of carpools. Transportation Research Record 724, 1979, 35-39.Google Scholar
  45. Levin, I. P., & Herring, R. D. Functional measurement of qualitative variables in mode choice: Ratings of economy, safety, and desirability of flying vs. driving. Transportation Research, 1981, 15, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Levin, I. P., Kim, K. J., & Corry, F. A. Invariance of the weight parameter in information integration. Memory & Cognition, 1976, 4, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levin, I. P., Mosell, M. K., Lamka, C. M., Savage, B. E., & Gray, M. J. Measurement of psychological factors and their role in travel behavior. Transportation Research Record 649, 1977, 1-7.Google Scholar
  48. Levin, I. P., Louviere, J. J., Meyer, R. J., & Henley, D. H. Individual decision processes in mode choice. Paper presented at meetings of Transportation Research Board, January 1980, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  49. Louviere, J. J. Applications of principles of experimental design to the modelling and prediction of judgment and choice: A functional measurement approach. Paper presented to the Meetings of the Australia Road Research Bureau, Sydney, Australia, 1980.Google Scholar
  50. Louviere, J. J., & Hensher, D. A. On the design of experiments to model choice behavior: A leisure travel destination choice example. Unpublished manuscript, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 1980.Google Scholar
  51. Louviere, J. J., & Meyer, R. J. A model for residential impression formation. Geographical Analysis, 1976, 8, 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Louviere, J. J., Wilson, E. M., & Piccolo, J. M. Psychological modelling and measurement in travel demand: A state-of-the-art review with applications. In D. A. Hensher & P. R. Stopher (Eds.), Behavioural travel modelling. London: Croom Helm, 1979, pp. 713–738.Google Scholar
  53. Luce, R. D. Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar
  54. Mackay, D. B., Olshavsky, R. W., & Sentell, G. Cognitive maps and spatial behavior of consumers. Geographical Analysis, 1975, 7, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McFadden, D. L. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in economics. New York: Academic Press, 1974, pp. 105–142.Google Scholar
  56. Meyer, R. J. A behavioral model of choice set formation in destination choice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 1979.Google Scholar
  57. Meyer, R. J., Levin, I. P., & Louviere, J. J. Functional analysis of mode choice. Transportation Research Record 673, 1978, 1-7.Google Scholar
  58. Neveu, A. J. The 1973–1974 energy crisis: Impact on travel. Preliminary Research Report #131, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, 1977.Google Scholar
  59. Neveu, A. J., Koppelman, F. S., & Stopher, P. R. Perceptions of comfort, convenience, and reliability for the work trip. Preliminary Research Report 143, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, 1978.Google Scholar
  60. Nicolaidis, G. C. Quantification of the comfort variable. Transportation Research, 1975, 9, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nicolaidis, G. C, & Dobson, R. Disaggregated perceptions and preferences in transportation planning. Transportation Research, 1975, 9, 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Norman, K. L. A solution for weights and scale values in functional measurement. Psychological Review, 1976, 83, 80–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Norman, K. L., & Louviere, J. J. Integration of attributes in bus transportation: Two modeling approaches. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 753–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Paine, F. T., Nash, A. N., Hille, S. J., & Brunner, G. A. Consumer attitudes toward auto versus public transport alternatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 472–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Quandt, R. E. Estimation of modal splits. Transportation Research, 1968, 2, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Recker, W. W., & Golob, T. F. An attitudinal modal choice model. Transportation Research, 1976, 10, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Restle, F. Psychology of judgment and choice. New York: Wiley, 1961.Google Scholar
  68. Richards, M. G., & Ben-Akiva, M. E. A disaggregate travel demand model. Lexington, Mass.: Saxon House/Lexington Books, 1975.Google Scholar
  69. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 1977, 28, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stopher, P. R., & Ergün, G. Population segmentation in urban recreation choices. Paper presented at meetings of Transportation Research Board, January 1979, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  71. Stopher, P. R., Spear, B. D., & Sucher, P. O. Toward the development of measures of convenience for travel modes. Transportation Research Record 527, 1974, 16-32.Google Scholar
  72. Thurstone, L. L. The measurement of social attitudes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1931, 26, 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Watson, P. L., & Westin, R. B. Transferability of disaggregate mode choice models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1975, 5, 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wicker, A. W. Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 25, 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wilson, A. G. A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research, 1967, 1, 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wooton, H. J., & Pick, G. W. A model of trips generated by household. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1967, 1, 137–153.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irwin P. Levin
    • 1
  • Jordan J. Louviere
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of MarketingUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations