Advertisement

Entomologists and the Revolution

  • John H. Perkins

Abstract

Economic entomology as a distinct field of study began in the last half of the nineteenth century. Its crystallization into a discipline and a profession was contemporaneous with the emergence of mechanized, capital-intensive agriculture. Indeed, professionalism for entomologists was analogous in a socioeconomic sense to the transformation of agriculture. Just as farmers gained social status and better incomes by substituting capital for labor, entomologists gained status and higher incomes by organizing themselves into a strong professional association. The development of economic entomology was also an integral part of the growth in American government and universities as major loci for research and teaching. By 1900, entomologists were an identifiable scientific group with intellectual and social roots extending to other academics, farmers, and colleagues in the civil service.

Keywords

Integrate Pest Management Personal Interview Gypsy Moth Insect Control Boll Weevil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference Notes

  1. 1.
    Magali Sarfatti Larson, The Rise of Professionalism, A Sociological Analysis (Berkeley: Univ. of Calif. Press, 1977), p. 5 (hereafter cited as Larson, Rise of Professionalism). Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid., p. 8Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. O. Howard, A brief account of the rise and present condition of official economic entomology, Insect Life 7 (1894): 55–108 (hereafter cited as Howard, A brief account).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. O. Howard, A History of Applied Entomology, Smithsonian Misc. Collection, Vol. 84, 1930, pp. 35–50 (hereafter cited as Howard, History).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    U.S. Entomological Commission, First Annual Report (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1878), pp. 1,Google Scholar
  6. 5a.
    U.S. Entomological Commission, First Annual Report (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1878), pp. 34.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    John T. Schlebecker, Grasshoppers in American agricultural history, Agric. Hist. 27 (1953): 85–93.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Harold E. Briggs, Grasshopper plagues and early Dakota agriculture, 1864–1876, Agric. Hist 8 (1934): 51–63.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
  10. 9.
    Howard, History, pp. 54–55, 78–83.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Mortimer D. Leonard, The development of commercial entomology in the United States, Proceedings Tenth International Congress of Entomology, 1956, Vol. 3, (Ottawa[?], 1958), pp. 99–106.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Howard, History, p. 215.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
  14. 13.
    For a review of the work on gypsy moth and boll weevil, see Thomas R. Dunlap, The triumph of chemical pesticides in insect control, 1890–1920, Environ. Rev. No. 5 (1978): 38–47. See Chapter 4 for discussion on biological control.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    A. S. Packard, Entomology for Beginners (New York: H. Holt, 1894 [c. 1888]), pp. 221–222.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    E. Dwight Sanderson, Insect Pests of Farm, Garden and Orchard (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1913), pp. 32–78.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    George A. Dean. How we may increase the effectiveness of economic entomology,J. Eton. Entomol. 15 (1922): 44–53.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    A. F. Burgess, Our Association,J. Econ. Entomol. 18 (1925): 47.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    James Whorton, Before Silent Spring (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1974), 288 pp.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    Howard, History, pp. 27, 70–78.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    Paul Knight, The development and present status of entomological courses in American colleges and universities,J. Econ. Entomol. 21 (1928): 871–877.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    Roger C. Smith, The doctor’s degree,J. Econ. Entomol. 41 (1948): 843–845.Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    S. A. Rohwer, Are entomologists too specialized?,J. Econ. Entomol. 41 (1948): 995–996.Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    Conner Sorensen, American entomologists organize the Entomological Society of Pennsylvania, 1842–1852, unpublished paper presented to the West Coast History of Science Society, Dec. 27, 1978, 9 pp.Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    Howard, History, p. 69; American Association of Economic Entomologists, Constitution, and Report of the Joint Committee on Legislation, J. Econ. Entomol. 2 (1909): 4–8.Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    Margaret Rossiter, The Emergence of Agricultural Science (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1975), 275 pp.Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    William Kirby and William Spence, An Introduction to Entomology (London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, 1822–1826), 4 vols.Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    John Curtis, Farm Insects (London: John Van Voorst, 1883), 528 pp. Curtis dated the introduction of the first edition as Jan., 1859.Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    F. Schwerdtfeger, “Forest entomology,” in History of Entomology, Ray F. Smith, Thomas E. Mittler, and Carroll N. Smith, eds. (Palo Alto, California: Annual Reviews, Inc., 1973), pp. 367–369.Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    Howard, History, pp. 51, 61–63.Google Scholar
  31. 30.
    Howard, A brief account, pp. 73–74.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    Anon., Editorial, Rev. Appl. Entomol. 4 (1916): 1; see also Howard, History, pp. 542–543.Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    Edward F. Knipling, personal interview, July 13–14, 1976.Google Scholar
  34. 33.
    L. D. Newsom, personal interview, June 1–2, 1978.Google Scholar
  35. 34.
    Carl B. Huffaker, personal interview, March 17–18, 1977.Google Scholar
  36. 35.
    Charles G. Lincoln, personal interview, June 6–7, 1978.Google Scholar
  37. 36.
    Dwight Isely and A. J. Ackerman, Life history of the codling moth in Arkansas, Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. No. 189, University of Arkansas, Dec, 1923, 57 pages;Google Scholar
  38. 36a.
    E. J. Newcomer and W. D. Whitcomb, Life history of the codling moth in the Yakima Valley of Washington, USDA Bull No. 1235, Nov. 28, 1924, 76 pages;Google Scholar
  39. 36b.
    F. E. Brooks and E. B. Blakeslee, Studies of the codling moth in the central Appalachian region, USDA Bull. No. 189, Apr. 12, 1915, 49 pp.Google Scholar
  40. 37.
    Perry L. Adkisson, personal interview, May 30–31, 1978.Google Scholar
  41. 38.
    James R. Brazzel, personal interview, May 26–27, 1978.Google Scholar
  42. 39.
    An important exception was Robert van den Bosch’s The Pesticide Conspiracy (Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Co., Inc., 1978), 226 pp. Van den Bosch’s book, however, is so recent that its effect cannot yet be judged.Google Scholar
  43. 40.
    C. B. Huf faker to Proposed Ad Hoc Committee to Consider “The Role of Economic and Systems Analysis in the IBP-Biological Control-Crop Ecosystems Project,” June 25, 1971, files of C. B. Huffaker.Google Scholar
  44. 41.
    Brazzel, personal interview.Google Scholar
  45. 42.
    Adkisson, personal interview.Google Scholar
  46. 43.
    A. H. Moseman to A. A. M. Struycken, Jan. 8, 1954, Record Group 310, National Archives (RG310NA).Google Scholar
  47. 44.
    Knipling, personal interview.Google Scholar
  48. 45.
    See, for example, Frank P. Samford to George Andrews, Sept. 28, 1949, RG7NA.Google Scholar
  49. 46.
    Percy N. Annand to William Howard Smith, Nov. 22, 1949, RG7NA (letter prepared by Knipling).Google Scholar
  50. 47.
    Ashmead F. Pringle, Jr., to Burnet R. Maybank, Sept. 22, 1950, RG7NA.Google Scholar
  51. 48.
    William Howard Smith to Lister Hill, Feb. 28, 1951; Avery S. Hoyt to Lister Hill, Mar. 14, 1951; W. L. Popham to Lister Hill, May 4, 1951 (letter prepared by Knipling); M. E. H., Office Memorandum, Aug. 17, 1951; all from RG7NA. U.S. Congress, Senate, Committee on Appropriations Agricultural Appropriations for 1953, Hearings, 82nd Congress, 2nd sess., 1952, p. 839.Google Scholar
  52. 49.
    For anecdotes on Texas ranchers’ use of labor to handle problems with screwworms, see Charles G. Scruggs, The Peaceful Atom and the Deadly Fly (Austin, Texas: Jenkins Pub. Co., The Pemberton Press, 1975), pp. 128–131.Google Scholar
  53. 50.
    Knipling, personal interview.Google Scholar
  54. 51.
    Paul H. De Bach, personal interview, March 22–23, 1977; Paul DeBach and Ragnhild A. Sundby, Competitive displacement between ecological homologues, Hilgardia 34 (1963): 105–166.Google Scholar
  55. 52.
    Carl B. Huffaker to Principal Investigators, Executive Committee of the IPM Project, Oct. 29, 1974, files of C. B. Huffaker; idem, personal communication, 1979.Google Scholar
  56. 53.
    Howard, History, p. 540.Google Scholar
  57. 54.
    Adkisson, personal interview.Google Scholar
  58. 55.
    Rachel Carson, Silent Spring (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1962), especially pp. 258–259.Google Scholar
  59. 56.
    Larson, Rise of Professionalism, pp. 104–135.Google Scholar
  60. 57.
    Carson, Silent Spring, pp. 258–259.Google Scholar
  61. 58.
    J. C. Headly, The economic milieu of pest control: have past priorities changed?, in Pest Control: Cultural and Environmental Aspects, David Pimentel and John H. Perkins, eds. (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1980), pp. 81–97.Google Scholar
  62. 59.
    Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1970), pp. 19.Google Scholar
  63. 59a.
    Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1970), pp. 69.Google Scholar
  64. 60.
    Edward W. Constant II, A model for technological change applied to the turbojet revolution, Technology and Culture 14 (1973): 553–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • John H. Perkins
    • 1
  1. 1.The Evergreen State CollegeOlympiaUSA

Personalised recommendations