Basic Biology of Microbial Fermentation

  • Willis A. Wood
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series

Abstract

The great majority of what we know about microbial fermentations was discovered before 1950 (See review by Wood (1)). Since then microbial and biochemical science has passed on to questions of structure and function of macromolecules, organelles and cells thought to be more intriguing or deserving of attention. Now for economic and strategic reasons, attention is once again focused on microbial fermentations for their potential to produce useful and energy-containing products from starch, waste materials or currently unusable biomass. Further, strategists in this area have a kind of tacit belief that, somewhere in the tremendous explosion of biological and chemical knowledge since 1950, there are missing pieces of information and techniques, that when capitalized upon, will propel microbial fermentations from their current state of near obliyion back to center stage, being caught up in a new wave of bioinnovation. In such a scenario the task will be to couple the new knowledge with the old science and technology of fermentation. In such a new endeavor those with the old knowledge need to know what opportunities the new knowledge makes possible, and the practitioners of new science need to know a fair amount about the old science rather than attempting to “reinvent the wheel”.

Keywords

Lactate Lignin Pyruvate Fructose NADH 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wood, W.A. (1961) Fermentation of Carbohydrates and Related Compounds in Vol. II, The Bacteria. Gunsalus, I.C. and Stanier, R.Y., eds., p. 59–149, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mortlock, R.P., Fossitt, D.D. and Wood, W.A. (1965) A Basis for Utilization of Unnatural Pentoses and Pentitols by Aevobaotev aevogenes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA.54, 572–579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ainsworth, S. (1977) Steady State Enzyme Kinetics, p. 202–224, University Park Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pontremoli, S., Bonsigmore, A., Grazi, E. and Horecker, B.L. (1960) A Coupled Reaction Catalyzed by the Enzymes Transketolase and Transaldolase. J. Biol. Chem. 235, 1881–1887.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mansson, M.-O., Larsson, P.-O. and Mossbach, K. (1978) Covalent Binding of an NAD Analog to Liver Alcohol Dehydrogenase Resulting in an Enzyme-Coenzyme Complex not Requiring Exogenous Coenzyme for Activity. Eur. J. Biochem. 86, 455–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mansson, M.-O., Larsson, P.-O. and Mossbach, K. (1979) Recycling by a Second Enzyme of NAD Covalently Bound to Alcohol Dehydrogenase. FEBS Let. 98, 309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lerner, S.A., Wu, T.T. and Lin, E.C.C. (1964) Evolution of Catabolic Pathways in Bacteria. Science 146, 1313–1315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Larsson, P.-O. and Mossbach, K. (1979) Alcohol Production by Magnetic Immobilized Yeast. Biotech. Let. 1, 501–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willis A. Wood
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiochemistryMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations