A Multiple Component Model of Clinical Imagery

  • Kirk Strosahl
  • James C. Ascough


The previous decade has witnessed a rapid proliferation of imagery-based psychotherapies, ranging from psychodynamic techniques such as psycho-imagination therapy (Shorr, 1974) to more structured and focused behavior modification procedures (Cautela, 1967; Wolpe, 1958). Despite the promise of imagery as a psychotherapeutic tool, a host of issues remain about the functional and structural characteristics of this complex private process. A frank assessment of the literature indicates that theoreticians and researchers alike continue to grope for a way to conceptualize the experience of clinical images. Many theories with little consensus explain therapeutic significance of imagery, but are constrained primarily by being “technique specific” in that they describe the therapeutic impact of a single therapy or a generically related group of therapies (Singer, 1974). Conversely, limited effort has been directed toward an understanding of nonspecific imagery effects that may be related simply to the fact that imagery provides different modes for organizing personal world conceptions. Clinical experience suggests that there is something distinctive about imagery as a form of cognition that cannot be duplicated by verbal processes, but one is pressed to identify what these distinctive elements are.


Mental Rotation Emotive Valence Gain Score Imagery Ability Systematic Desensitization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference Notes

  1. 1.
    Strosahl, K. Relative efficacy of covert modeling, desensitization and relaxation training in the reduction of test anxiety. Unpublished manuscript. Purdue University.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strosahl, K. and Ascough, J. Relating the structure and function of imagery: An empirical analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication. Purdue University, May, 1980.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strosahl, K., Ascough, J., and Mariotto, M. Imagery integrity and its relationship to analogue behavior therapy outcome. Manuscript submitted for publication. Purdue University.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strosahl, K., Chaffee, R. and Ascough, J. A process and outcome investigation of covert modeling variations in the treatment of social anxiety. Manuscript submitted for publication. Purdue University.Google Scholar


  1. Anderson, J. Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 1978, 85, 249–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cautela, J. Covert sensitization. Psychological Reports, 1967, 20, 459–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. Applied multiple regression analysisfor the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper, L. Mental rotation of random two dimensional shapes. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7, 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, L. and Shepard, R. The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus. Memory and Cognition, 1973, 1, 246–250. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, L. and Shepard, R. Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In W. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press, 1973. (b)Google Scholar
  7. Davis, D., McLemore, C. and London, P. The role of visual imagery in desensitization. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1970, 8, 11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dyckman, J. and Cowan, P. Imaging vividness and the outcome of in vivo and imagined scene desensitization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 1155–1156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldfried, M. Systematic desensitization as training in self-control. Journal of Consuting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 37, 228–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gordon, R. An investigation into some of the factors that favour the formation of stereotyped images. British Journal of Psychology, 1949, 39, 156–157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hiscock, M. Imagery assessment through self-report: What do imagery questionnaires measure? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 223–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holyoak, K. and Walker, J. Subjective magnitude information in semantic ordering. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976, 15, 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kosslyn, S. Information representation in visual images. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7, 341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kosslyn, S. Can imagery be distinguished from other forms of internal representation? Evidence from studies of information retrieval time. Memory and Cognition, 1976, 4, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kosslyn, S. and Pomarantz, J. Imagery, propositions and the form of internal representations. Cognitive Psychology, 1977, 9, 52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kosslyn, S. Measuring the visual angle of the mind’s eye. Cognitive Psychology, 1978, 10, 356–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lang, P. Imagery in therapy: An information processing analysis of fear. Behavior Therapy, 1977, 8, 862–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahoney, M. Cognition and behavior modification. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1974.Google Scholar
  19. McLemore, C. Imagery in desensitization. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1972, 10, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McLemore, C. Factorial validity of imagery measures. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1976, 14, 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McSweeney, A. Imagery as a variable in the efficacy of systematic desensitization. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976, 36, (10-B), 5271.Google Scholar
  22. Meichenbaum, D. Cognitive behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  23. Paivio, A. Mental comparisons involving abstract attributes. Memory and Cognition, 1978, 6, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Posner, M. and Keele, S. Decay of visual information from a single letter. Science, 1967, 158, 137–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pylyshyn, Z. What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Segal, S. and Fusella, V. Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on detection of visual and auditory signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 83, 458–464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sheehan, P. A shortened form of the Betts Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1967, 23, 386–389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shepard, R. The mental image. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shorr, J. Psychotherapy through imagery. New York: Intercontinental Medical Book Corporation, 1974.Google Scholar
  30. Singer, J. Imagery and daydream methods in psychotherapy and behavior modification. New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  31. Strosahl, K., and Ascough, J. Clinical uses of imagery: Experimental foundations, theoretical misconceptions and research issues. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, in press.Google Scholar
  32. Tversky, B. Pictorial and verbal encoding in a short term memory task. Perception and Psychophysics, 1969, 6, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wolpe, J. Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kirk Strosahl
    • 1
  • James C. Ascough
    • 2
  1. 1.American Lake Veterans Administration HospitalTacomaUSA
  2. 2.PurdueWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations