Brain Hemisphericity and Response to the Imaginal Processes Inventory

  • Paul Bakan
  • William G. Glackman

Abstract

The concept of hemisphericity was introduced by Bogen (1969) to relate the findings of functional hemispheric asymmetry of the brain to individual differences in cognitive functioning. It is now well established that the right and left hemispheres of the human brain, despite a superficial similarity in appearance, are quite different in mode of functioning. Functional asymmetry, first noted in the greater specialization of the left hemisphere for language, has now been extended to a number of other cognitive and affective variables including perception of music, faces, emotional tone, visuo-spatial skills, dreaming, depression and other personality variables. The concept of hemisphericity denotes the characteristic tendency of an individual to rely on one or the other (right or left) hemispheric modes of processing regardless of task requirements.

Keywords

Depression Sonal Tudy lIle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakan, P. Hypnotizability, laterality of eye-movements and functional brain asymmetry. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969, 28, 927–932.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakan, P. The eyes have it. Psychology Today, April 1971, 64–67 and 96.Google Scholar
  3. Bakan, P. Two streams of consciousness: a typological approach. In K. S. Pope and J. L. Singer (Eds.), The stream of consciousness: Scientific investigations into the flow of human experience. New York: Plenum, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. Bakan, P. Imagery, raw and cooked: A hemispheric recipe. In J. E. Shorr, J. Connella, G. Sobel, and P. Robin (Eds.), Imagery: Its many dimensions and applications. New York: Plenum, 1980.Google Scholar
  5. Bogen, J. E. The other side of the brain. II: An appositional mind. Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Societies, 1969, 34, 135–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Day, M. E. An eye-movement phenomenon related to attention, thought and anxiety, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1964, 19, 443–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehrlichmann, H., and Weinberger, A. Lateral eye movements and hemispheric asymmetry: a critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 1978, 85, 1080–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flor-Henry, P. Lateralized temporal-limbic dysfunction and psychopathology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1976, 280, 777–795.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Giambra, L. M. A factor analysis of the items of the Imaginai Processes Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1980, 36, 383–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gur, R., and Gur R. Correlates of conjugate lateral eye movements in man. In S. Harnad, Lateralization in the nervous system. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. Hommes, O. R., and Panhuysen, L. Depression and cerebral dominance. Psychiatria, Neurologia, Neurochirurgia, 1971, 74, 259–270.Google Scholar
  12. Meskin, B. B., and Singer, J. L. Daydreaming, reflective thought, and laterality of eye movements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 64–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rossi, G. F., and Rosadini, G. Experimental analysis of cerebral dominance in man. In F. L. Darley (Ed.), Brain mechanisms underlying speech and language, New York: Grune and Stratton, 1967.Google Scholar
  14. Singer, J. L., and Antrobus, J. S. A factor analytic study of daydreaming and conceptually related cognitive and personality variables. Perceptual and Motor Skills Monograph Supplement, 1963, 17, 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Singer, J. L. and Antrobus, J. S. Daydreaming, imaginal processes, and personality: A normative study. In P. W. Sheehan (Ed.) The function and nature of imagery. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Bakan
    • 1
  • William G. Glackman
    • 1
  1. 1.Simon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations