Advertisement

Interpretation of Long Wavelength Magnetic Anomalies

  • Paolo Gasparini
  • Marta S. M. Mantovani
  • Wladimir Shukowsky
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (EMISS, volume 11)

Abstract

The Earth’s magnetic field (emf) measured at or above the Earth’s surface has two main components of internal origin: a primary (or main) field which is originated in the outer core and appears as large scale features at the Earth’s surface, and a secondary field which is due to both induced and remanent magnetization of high susceptibility ferrimagnetic minerals occurring in crustal rocks. The latter field is much weaker than the main field and it is locally variable according to the nature of the underlying crustal rocks. These two components of the emf appear clearly in a power spectrum analysis of the emf intensity along a world encircling profile (Alldredge et al., 1963). The energy of the spectrum is concentrated at wavelengths greater than about 2,000 km and smaller than 400–500 km (Fig.1). In the representation of the emf as an infinite series of spherical harmonic functions, the main field therefore is described by the harmonics up to order and degree about (13, 13) and the field of crustal origin by harmonics higher than (40, 40).

Keywords

Curie Temperature Lower Crust Magnetic Anomaly Secular Variation Main Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Alldredge, L.R., Van Vookhis, G.D., and Davis, T.M., 1963, A magnetic profile around the world, J. Geophys. Res., 68:3679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida, F.F., de, 1977, Ocraton de Sao Francisco, Rev. Brasil Geoc., 7: 349–364.Google Scholar
  3. Barraclough, D.R., Harwood, J.M., Leaton, B.R., and Malin S.R.C., 1978, A definitive model of the geomagnetic field and its secular variation for 1965. I. Derivation of model and comparison with the IGRF, Geophys. J.R. Astr. Soc., 55:111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharryya, B.K., Lev, L.K., 1975, Analysis of magnetic anomalies over Yellowstone National Park: mapping of Curie point isothermal surface for geothermal reconnaissance, J. Geophys. Res., 80:4416–4465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackman, R.B., Tuckey, J.W., 1959, The measurement of Power Spectra from the point of view of communication engineering. New York, Dover Publ.Google Scholar
  6. Blitzkow, D., Gasparini, P., Mantovani, M.S.M., Sa, N.C., de, 1979, Crustal structures of Southeastern Minas Gerais, Brazil, deduced by gravity measuments, Rev. Brasil, Geoc., 9:38–47.Google Scholar
  7. Burg, J.P., 1967, Maximum enthropy spectral analysis. Paper presented at 37th Ann. Int. JEG Meeting Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  8. Cordani, U.G., Amaral, G., Kawashita, K., 1973, The Precambrian evolution of South America, Geol. Rund., 62:309:317.Google Scholar
  9. Corrado, G., Gasparini, P., Mantovani, M.S.M., Rapolla, A., 1979, Depth of Curie temperature computed from aeromagnetic anomalies in Southeastern Minas Gerais, Brazil, Rev. Brasileira de Geociencias, 9:33–38.Google Scholar
  10. Corrado, G., Pinna, E., Rapolla, A., 1977, The magnetic field of Italy: description and analysis of the new T, Z and H maps between 40° N and 44° N, Boll. Geof. Teor. e Appl., vol. XX, 75:140–156.Google Scholar
  11. Dawson, E., and Newitt, L.R., 1978, IGRF comparisons, Phys. of the Earth and Plan. Int., 16:P1–P6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gasparini, P., Mantovani, M.S.M., Corrado, G., and Rapolla, A., 1979, Depth of Curie temperature in continental shields: a compositional Boundary?, Nature 278 N°5707:845–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haggerty, S.F., 1978, Mineralogical constraints on Curie isotherms in deep crustal magnetic anomalies, Geophys. Res. Letters, 5:105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IAGA Division 1 Study Group, 1976, International geomagnetic reference field 1975, EOS (Trans. Am. Geophys. Union), 57:120-121.Google Scholar
  15. Kanasewich, E.R., 1975, Time sequence analysis in geophysics Univ. of Alberta Press, Edmonton, Canada.Google Scholar
  16. Krutikhovskaya, Z.A., and Pashkevich, I.K., 1979, Long-wavelength magnetic anomalies as a sorce of information about deep crustal structure, J. Geophys., 46:301–317.Google Scholar
  17. Kulhanek, O., 1976, Introduction to digital filtering in geophysics Elsevier Publ. Co. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  18. Shuey, R.T., Schellinger, D.K., Tripp, A.C., Alley, L.B., 1977, Curie depth determination from aeromagnetic spectra, Geophys. J.R. Astr. Soc., 50:75:101.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, R.B., Shuey, R.T., Pelton, J.R., Bailey, J.P., 1977, yellostone hot spot: contemporary tectonics and crustal properties from earthquake and aeromagnetic data, J. Geophys. Res., 82:3665–3676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Spector, A., Grant, F.S., 1970, Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data, Geophysics, 35:293–302.Google Scholar
  21. Wasilewski, P.J., Thomas, H.H., Mayhew, M.A., 1979, The Mono as a magnetic boundary, Geophys. Res. Letters, 6:541–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Willye, P., 1971, The dynamic Earth, J. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Zmuda, A.J., 1971, World Magnetic Survey 1957–1969, IAGA Bulletin n. 28. IUGG Publication 206 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Gasparini
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marta S. M. Mantovani
    • 3
  • Wladimir Shukowsky
    • 3
  1. 1.Istituto di Geologia e GeofisicaUniversità di NapoliItaly
  2. 2.Osservatorio VesuvianoNapoliItaly
  3. 3.Instituto Astronomico e GeofisicoUniversidade de Sao PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations