Advertisement

A Review of Methods to Prepare Self-Supporting Carbon Targets and of Their Importance in Accelerator Experiments

  • P. Maier-Komor

Abstract

Carbon occupies a special position compared to all other elements. Without carbon, the basis for life would be impossible. Organic chemistry or carbon chemistry is an independent part of chemistry. Just so the element carbon occupies an exceptional position in target preparation for nuclear measurements due to its melting point, the highest of all elements, the very low vapor pressure and the chemical stability which is comparable to that of the noble metals. Carbon has only two stable isotopes and one radioactive isotope the half-life of which is long enough to prepare targets. The natural abundance of carbon-12 is nearly 99% which means a natural carbon target can be used in most cases as isotopic 12C-target. But this is only one part of the story, the other one is given by the excellent properties of the self-supporting foils. The good tensile strength of an amorphous carbon layer can be estimated by the minimum thickness of a self-supporting foil. Carbon foils can be prepared even below 1 μg/cm2 (≈ 60 Å), they are one order of magnitude thinner than foils of any other element.

Keywords

Methyl Iodide Carbon Foil Accelerator Experiment Good Tensile Strength Parting Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    D. S. Gemmel, E. P. Kanter, and W. J. Pietsch, Chem. Phys. Lett. 55 (1978) 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    G. E. Myers and G. L. Montet, J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1966) 4195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    M. Rebak, J. P. F. Sellshop, T. E. Derry, and R. W. Fearick, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 167. (1979) 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    W. R. Lozowski, Proc. 6th Ann. Conf. INTDS, Berkeley (LBL-7950) (1977) 115.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    V. E. Viola Jr. and D. J. O’Connell, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 32 (1965) 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    R. D. McCormick and J. D. McCormack, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 13 (1961) 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    G. C. Phillips and J. E. Richardson, Rev. Sci. Instr. 21 (1950) 885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    H. D. Holmgren, J. M. Blair, K. F. Famularo, T. F. Stratton, and R. V. Stuart, Rev. Sci. Instr. 25 (1954) 1026.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    E. Kashy, R. R. Perry, and J. R. Risser, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 4 (1959) 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    A. H. F. Muggleton, Proc. Seminar on the Prep, and Standardisation of Isotopic Targets and Foils, Harwell, Oxon ÄERE-R5Q97 (1965) 99.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    R. Keller and H. H. Müller, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 119 (1974) 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    H. J. Maier, these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    N. R. S. Tait, D. W. L. Tolfree, B. H. Armitage, and D. S. Whitmell, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 167. (1979) 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    H. König and G. Helwig, Zeitschrift für Physik 129 (1951) 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. (15).
    H. Baumann and H. L. Wirth, Nucl. Instr. and Meth, 167 (1979) 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. (16).
    G. Sletten and P. Knudsen, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 102 (1972) 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. (17).
    D. E. Bradley, Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 5 (1954) 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. (18).
    G. Dearnaley, Rev. Sci. Instr. 31 (1960) 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. (19).
    N. Sarma, Nucl. Instr. 2 (1958) 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. (20).
    R. D. McCormick and J. D. McCormack, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 13 (1961) 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. (21).
    M. Nobes, J. Sei. Instr. 42 (1965) 753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (22).
    P. Maier-Komor, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 102 (1972) 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. (23).
    I. Pfeiffer, Naturwissenschaften 42 (1955) 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. (24).
    M. D. Blue and G. C. Danielson, J. Appl. Phys. 28 (1957) 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. (25).
    S. Takeuchi, C. Kobayashi, Y. Satoh, T. Yoshida,Google Scholar
  26. E. Takekoshi, and M. Maruyama, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 158 (1979) 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. (26).
    A. Greenville-Whittaker and P. Kinter, Carbon 7 (1969) 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. (27).
    S. H. Maxman, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 50 (1967) 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. (28).
    M. Morgan, Thin Solid Films 7 (1971) 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. (29).
    J. L. Gallant, Proc. 3rd Ann. Conf. of the INTDS, Chalk River, AECL-5503 (1974) 172.Google Scholar
  31. (30).
    D. N. Braski, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 102 (1972) 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. (31).
    H. K. Abele, P. Glässel, P. Maier-Komor, H. Rösier, H. J. Scheerer, and H. Vonach, Proc. 4th Ann. Conf. INTDS, Argonne 1975, ANL/PHY/MSD-76–1, p. 117.Google Scholar
  33. (32).
    H. K. Abele, P. Glässel, P. Maier-Komor, H. J. Scheerer, H. Rösier, and H. Vonach, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 137 (1976) 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. (33).
    J. L. Yntema, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 98 (1972) 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. (34).
    P. Dobberstein and L. Henke, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 119 (1974) 611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. (35).
    A. E. Livingston, H. G. Berry, and G. E. Thomas, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 148 (1978) 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. (36).
    J. L. Yntema, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 113 (1973) 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. (37).
    G. E. Thomas, P. K. Den Hartog, J. L. Bicek, and J. L. Yntema, Proc. 6th Ann. Conf. INTDS, Berkeley 1977, LBL-7950.Google Scholar
  39. (38).
    U. Sander, H. H. Bukow, and H. v. Buttlar, J. de Physique 40 (1979) C1–301.Google Scholar
  40. (39).
    D. Balzer, these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  41. (40).
    P. Maier-Komor, Proc. 5th Ann. Conf. INTDS, Los Alamos 1976, LA-6850-C.Google Scholar
  42. (41).
    U. Sander and H. H. Bukow, Radiation Effects 40 (1979) 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. (42).
    P. Maier-Komor and E. Ranzinger, these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  44. (43).
    J. L. Gallant, D. Yaraskavitch, N. Burn, A. B. McDonald, and H. R. Andrews, these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  45. (44).
    R. L. Auble and D. M. Galbraith, these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  46. (45).
    A. Meens, Centre de Recherches Nucleaires, Strasbourg, France, private communication.Google Scholar
  47. (46).
    B. Huck and H. Wirth, Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg, West Germany, private communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Maier-Komor
    • 1
  1. 1.Physi k-DepartmentTechnische Universität MünchenGarchingWest Germany

Personalised recommendations