Normal-Superconducting Boundaries

  • A. B. Pippard
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSB, volume 65)


Normal-superconducting (NS) boundaries may be fabricated directly, e.g. by evaporation of lead onto a copper foil, or as a stack of alternating N and S laminae in the intermediate state of a type I superconductor. The technique for achieving regularly stacked laminae, transverse to a long rod, is described by Walton (1965) and a typical curve for the thermal resistivity of tin obtained in this work is shown in Fig. 1. The fraction of normal material rises linearly with magnetic field, and so does the electrical resistance, indicating that N and S laminae behave as a chain of resistors in series, with no extra contribution from the boundaries. By contrast the thermal resistivity is dominated by the boundaries. As the temperature approaches Tc the thermal boundary resistance becomes less marked and at the same time a boundary contribution to the electrical resistance becomes apparent, as illustrated in Fig. 2 (Landau, 1970; Pippard et al., 1971).


Copper Foil Evanescent Wave Normal Metal Phase Coherence Interface Resistance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andreev, A.F., 1964, The thermal conductivity of the intermediate state in superconductors, Sov. Phys. J.E.T.P., 19:1228.Google Scholar
  2. Harding, G.L., Pippard, A.B. and Tomlinson, J.R., 1974, Resistance of superconducting-normal interfaces, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., 340:1.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Krähenbühl, Y. and Watts-Tobin, R.J., 1979, Microscopic theory of the current-voltage relationship across a normal-superconducting interface, J. Low Temp. Phys., 35:569.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Landau, I.L., 1970, Temperature dependence of the reflection coefficient of electrons on the interface between superconducting and normal phases, J.E.T.P. Lett., 11:437.Google Scholar
  5. McMillan, W.L. and Anderson, P.W., 1966, Theory of geometrical resonances in the tunnelling characteristics of thick films of superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett., 16:85.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Phillips, W.A., 1969, Ultrasonic attenuation at 500 kHz in superconducting tin, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., 309:259.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pippard, A.B., Shepherd, J.G. and Tindall, D.A., 1971, Resistance of superconducting-normal interfaces, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., 324:17.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schmid, A. and Schon, G., 1975, Linearized kinetic equations and relaxation processes of a superconductor near Tc, J. Low Temp. Phys., 20:207.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tomasch, W.J., 1965, Geometrical resonance in the tunnelling characteristics of superconducting Pb, Phys. Rev. Lett., 15:672.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Waldram, J.R., 1975, Chemical potential and boundary resistance at normal-superconducting interfaces, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., 345:231.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Walton, A.J., 1965, The thermal and electrical resistance of tin in the intermediate state, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., 289:377.ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. B. Pippard
    • 1
  1. 1.Cavendish LaboratoryCambridgeEngland

Personalised recommendations