Voluntary and Involuntary Sterilization
We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes…. Three generations of imbeciles are enough.1
KeywordsRear Child Competent Parent Legal Precedent Selective Abortion Fourteenth Amendment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.D. D. Raphael, ed., Political Theory and the Rights of Man (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1967), p. 145, Article 16(1).Google Scholar
- 12.G. S. Neuwirth; P. A. Hersler; & K. S. Goldrich, “Capacity, Competence, Consent: Voluntary Sterilization of the Mentally Retarded,” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 6 (1975): 451.Google Scholar
- 19.J. E. Davis, “Birth Control by Sterilization” in Claude A. Frazier, ed., Is It Moral to Modify Man? (Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1973), pp. 75–76.Google Scholar
- 20.W. Kempton, “Sexual Rights and Responsibilities of the Retarded Person,” in The Social Welfare Forum, 1976, National Conference on Social Welfare (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977), pp. 217–218.Google Scholar