Lattice Dynamics of Substitutional 119mSn in Covalent Semiconductors

  • O. H. Nielsen


The theory of impurity vibrational amplitudes, Debye temperatures and Mössbauer Debye-Waller factors for 119mSn on substitutional positions in f.c.c., b.c.c. and zincblende lattices is described. Several models for such systems are commented ou, and an extension of Mannheim’s model to the zincblende structure is presented. Using Weber’s adiabatic bond charge model for the host lattices, unexpectedly small impurity-host force constants relative to the host-host force constants were found for 119mSn in silicon and germanium. Possible explanations are discussed. For 119mSn in α-tin reasonable agreement between the phonon model and experiment is observed.


Debye Temperature Host Lattice Zincblende Structure Perfect Lattice Vibrational Amplitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    I.M. Lifshitz, JETP 17, 1017, 1076 (1947); Nuovo Cimento 3 suppl. 4, 716 (1956)7-Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu.Kagan, Ya.A.Iosilevskii, JETP 15, 182 (1962); JETP 17, 195 (1963); JETP 19, 1462 (1964).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P.G. Dawber, R.J. Elliott, Proc. Roy. Soc. A (GB) 273 222 (1963); Proc. Phys. Soc. 81, 453 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.J. Elliott, D.W. Taylor, Proc. Phys. Soc. 83, 189 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.M. Grow, D.G. Howard, R.H. Nussbaum, M. Takeo, Phys. Rev. B 17, 15 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.W. Petersen, O.H. Nielsen, G. Weyer, E. Antoncik, S. Damgaard, Phys. Rev. B, in print.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.D. Mannheim, Phys. Rev. 165 1011 (1968); P.D. Mannheim, A. Simopoulos, Phys. Rev. 165, 845 (1968); P.D. Mannheim, S.S. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 4, 3748 (1971); P.D. Mannheim, Phys. Rev. B 5, 745 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.g.: G.W. Lehmann, R.E. DeWames, Phys. Rev. 131, 1008 (1963); D. Strauch, Phys. Stat. Sol. 30, 495 (1968); M. Vandevyver, P. Plumelle, J. Phys. Chem. Sol. 38, 765 (1977).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Weyer, A. Nylandsted-Larsen, B.I. Deutch, J.U. Andersen, Hyp. Int. 1, 93 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.A. Maradudin, E.W. Montroll, G.H. Weiss, I.P. Ipatova, Solid State Phys. suppl. 3, and ed., Academic Press (1971).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T.H.K. Barron, W.T. Berg, J.A. Morrison, Proc. Roy. Soc., London A242, 478 (1957).ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Weber, Phys. Rev. B 15, 4789 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O.H. Nielsen, W. Weber, Comput. Phys. Comm. 18, 101 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. H. Nielsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhysicsUniversity of AarhusAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations