Economic Evaluation of Anodic Protection

  • Olen L. RiggsJr.
  • Carl E. Locke
  • Norman E. Hamner


The task of making an economic study to determine the desirability of using anodic protection does not differ from that in evaluating any other engineering decision. Cost factors to be considered are listed in Table 5-1. Not all of the factors listed must be considered for every evaluation. It is virtually impossible to quantify other, perhaps equally pertinent, factors such as effects of extended delivery times for certain types of equipment, availability of materials at any price, and the cost of liability insurance covering one type of installation as compared to another.


Cathodic Protection Cost Index Corrosive Solution Tank Size Potential Controller 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Standard RP-02–72, Direct Calculation of Economic Appraisals of Corrosion Control Measures,NACE, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.K. Stephens and E.D. Verink, Jr., Mater. Perform. 17 (10), 15–18 (1978).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T.H. Arnold and C.H. Chilton, Chem. Eng., (NY) Feb. 18, 143 (1963)Google Scholar
  4. C.H. Chilton, Chem. Eng., Apr. 25, 184 (1966)Google Scholar
  5. O.R. Thorsen, Chem. Eng., Nov. 13, 168 (1972)Google Scholar
  6. L.J. Ricci, Chem. Eng., Apr. 28, 117 (1975)Google Scholar
  7. P.M. Kohn, Chem. Eng., May 8, 189 (1978).Google Scholar
  8. 4.
    R.W. Leitheiser et al., Corrosion 77/162, NACE, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
  9. 5.
    R. Walker, Metallurgia, No. 8, 51 (1970).Google Scholar
  10. 6.
    W.P. Banks and M. Hutchison, Mater. Prot. 8 (2), 31 (1969).Google Scholar
  11. 7.
    D. Fyfe, R. Vanderland, and J. Rodda, Chem. Eng. Prog. 73 (3), 65 (1977).Google Scholar
  12. 8.
    Heresite Chemical Co. Manitowoc, WI, private communication. (1979).Google Scholar
  13. 9.
    Chemetics International, Ltd., private communication, Willowdale, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    F.W.S. Jones, Anti-Corros., December 12 1976.Google Scholar
  15. 11.
    E.l. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., private communication, Coatesville, Pennsylvania (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olen L. RiggsJr.
    • 1
  • Carl E. Locke
    • 2
  • Norman E. Hamner
  1. 1.Kerr — McGee Technical CenterOklahoma CityUSA
  2. 2.University of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations