Patient and Family Education: A Requisite Component of Comprehensive Rehabilitation after Myocardial Infarction

  • Nanette Kass Wenger
Part of the Ettore Majorana International Science Series book series (EMISS, volume 4)


Illness is best controlled when the patient participates in disease management. The goal of patient and family education is to provide adequate information about the cardiac illness and its management to enable the patient to assume some responsibility for his or her continuing health care. Educational efforts are designed to identify areas of patient decision and responsibility. Dr. Lawrence Weed has said, “the most powerful of all medical and paramedical personnel is the patient — highly motivated, not costing anything — even willing to pay — and there is one for every member of the population.” The effects of incorporating the patient into the health care team include a decrease in the feeling of helplessness in dealing with the cardiac problem, aid in restoring self-esteem after an illness such as myocardial infarction which constitutes a life crisis, an increased confidence of the patient in a successful outcome and an increase in the patient’s ability to cope with illness. The educational programme should be instituted during the hospitalization for myocardial infarction and/or coronary bypass surgery and continued in the physician’s office or in a hospital or community clinic.


Memorial Hospital Coronary Care Unit Educational Effort Coronary Bypass Surgery Family Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    N. T. Argondizzo: Patient and Family Education. In N. K. Wenger, H. R. Hellerstein (eds.): Rehabilitation of the Coronary Patient, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1978, p.117.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. A. Baden: Teaching the coronary patient and his family. Nurs Clin North Am., 7:563, (1972).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Camp, S. Vycital: Your Pacemaker. Cardiac Clinic — Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, (1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. M. Dunbar: Adherence to medication: An intervention study with poor adherers. Circulation, 56 (Suppl 3):169, (1977).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. Haferkorn: Assessing individual learning needs as a basis for patient teaching. Nurs Clin North Am., 6:199, (1969).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. J. Linde, N. M. Janz: The effectiveness of a comprehensive teaching program on the knowledge and compliance of cardiovascular patients. Circulation 56 (Suppl 3):146, (1977).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. MacDaniel: Foods — To Eat to Reduce the Risk of Heart Attack. Cardiac Clinic — Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, (1974).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Mount, M. W. MacDonald: Now That Your Heart is Healing… Let’s Get Ready to Go Home. Cardiac Clinic — Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, (1973).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. K. Redman: The Process of Patient Teaching in Nursing (ed 3). C. V. Mosby, St. Louis, (1977).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. S. Smith: High Blood Pressure “The Silent Killer.” Cardiac Clinic — Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, (1975).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Smyth: Teaching patients. Nurs Clin North Am., 6:571, (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. K. Wenger: Post myocardial infarction patient and family education. Postgrad Med., 57:129, #7, (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. K. Wenger, Z. F. Mount: An educational algorithm for myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Nursing, 11:10, (1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nanette Kass Wenger
    • 1
  1. 1.Emory University School of MedicineAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations