Advertisement

Fuzzy Sets pp 341-367 | Cite as

Fuzzy Relational Products as a Tool for Analysis and Synthesis of the Behaviour of Complex Natural and Artificial Systems

  • Wyllis Bandler
  • Ladislav J. Kohout

Abstract

Increasingly complex interaction between man and nature, increasingly complex interaction between man and man-made artificial systems, make it increasingly difficult to comprehend the consequences of changes in all these systems, to analyze them, to understand their dynamics, to influence their behaviour.

Keywords

Artificial System Relational Product Fuzzy Subset Fuzzy Relation Implication Operator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandler, W., 1977a, Automaton modelling for the social sciences: a case study. Proc. of the First World Conf, on Math, at the Service of Man, Barcelona, 181–201.Google Scholar
  2. Bandler, W., 1977b, Some esomathematical uses of category theory, in: “Applied Systems Research,” G. J. Klir, ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1978, 243–255Google Scholar
  3. Bandler, W. and Kohout, L. J., 1978a, Fuzzy relational products and fuzzy implication operators. (Report No. FRP-1, Dept. of Maths., Univ. of Essex, Colchester.) Presented at the Workshop on Fuzzy Reasoning—Theory and Applications, Queen Mary College, London, 15 September 1978.Google Scholar
  4. Bandler, W. and Kohout, L. J., 1978b, Application of fuzzy logics to computer protection structures. (Report No. FRP-3, Dept. of Maths., Univ. of Essex, Colchester.) Proc. Ninth Intl. Symp. on Multiple-Valued Logic, Bath, England, May 29–31, 1979; IEEE, 79CH 1408–4C, New York, 200–207.Google Scholar
  5. Bandler, W. and Kohout, L. J., 1979a, The use of new relational products in clinical modelling. (Report No. FRP-4, Dept. of Maths., Univ. of Essex, Colchester.) In: “General Systems Research: A Science, a Methodology, a Technology (Proc. 1979 North American Meeting of the S.G.S.R.),” Louisville, Kentucky : S.G.S.R., 240–246.Google Scholar
  6. Bandler, W. and Kohout, L. J., 1979b, Fuzzy power sets and fuzzy implication operators. Report No. FRP-7, Dept. of Maths., Univ. of Essex, Colchester, to appear in Fuzzy Sets and Systems.Google Scholar
  7. Bandler, W. and Kohout, L. J., 1979c, Activity structures and their protection. (Report No. FRP-9, Dept. of Maths., University of Essex, Colchester.) Proc. Silver Anniv. Int. Mtg. of the Soc. for Gen. Syst. Research, Louisville, Kentucky: S.G.S.R., 239–244.Google Scholar
  8. Bandler, W., and Kohout, L. J., 1980a, Semantics of implication operators and fuzzy relational products. (Report No. FRP-8, Dept. of Maths., Univ. of Essex, Colchester.) Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 12, 89–116.Google Scholar
  9. Bandler, W. and Kohout, L. J., 1980b, “Mathematics for General Systems,” in preparation.Google Scholar
  10. Carnap, R., 1943, “Introduction to Semantics,” Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  11. Fransella, F. and Bannister, D., 1977, “A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique,” Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  12. Gaines, B. R., 1976a, On the complexity of causal models, IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-6, 56–59.Google Scholar
  13. Gaines, B. R., 1976b, General fuzzy logics, Proc. of 3rd European Mtg. on Cybernetics and Systems Research, Vienna.Google Scholar
  14. Gaines, B. R., 1976c, Foundations of fuzzy reasonings, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 8, 623–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaines, B. R. and Kohout, L. J., 1975, Possible automata, Proc. 1975 Intl. Symp. Multiple-Valued Logic, IEEE, New York, 183–196.Google Scholar
  16. Gaines, B. R. and Kohout, L. J., 1976, The logic of automata, Intl. J. General Systems, 2, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kohout, L. J., 1974, The Pinkava many-valued complete logic systems and their applications in design of many-valued switching circuits, Proc. 1974 Intl. Symp. on Multiple-Valued Logic, IEEE, New York, 74CH0845–8C, 261–284.Google Scholar
  18. Kohout, L. J., 1976a, Application of multi-valued logics to the study of human movement control and of movement disorders, Proc. Sixth Intl. Symp. on Multiple-Valued Logic, IEEE, New York, 76 CH 1111–4C.Google Scholar
  19. Kohout, L. J., 1976b, “Methodological Foundations of the Study of Action,” Tech. Report EES-MMS-ACT76, Man-Machine Syst. Lab., Dept. of Elec. Eng. Science, Univ. of Essex, Colchester, C04 3SQ, England.Google Scholar
  20. Kohout, L. J., 1976c, Representation of functional hierarchies of movement in the brain, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 8, 699–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kohout, L. J., 1977, Functional hierarchies in the brain, in: “Applied Systems Research,” G. J. Klir, ed., Plenum Press, New York, 1978, 531–544.Google Scholar
  22. Kohout, L. J., 1978, Analysis of computing protection structures by means of multi-valued logic systems, Proc. Eighth Intl. Symp. on Multiple-Valued Logic, IEEE, New York, 78CH 1366–4C.Google Scholar
  23. Kohout, L. J., 1980, Control of movement and protection structures, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, to appear.Google Scholar
  24. Kohout, L. J. and Gaines, B. R., 1975, The logic of protection, “Lecture Notes in Computer Science,” vol. 34, 736–751, Springer, Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
  25. Kohout, L. J. and Gaines, B. R., 1976, Protection as a general systems problem, Int. J. General Systems, 3, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kohout, L. J. and Pinkava, V, 1976, The functional completeness of Pi-algebras and its relevance to biological modelling and to technological applications of many-valued logics, in: “Discrete Systems and Fuzzy Reasoning,” E. H. Mamdani and B. R. Gaines, eds., EES-MMS-DSFR-76, Queen Mary College, University of London (Workshop Proc).Google Scholar
  27. Osgood, C. E, Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H., 1957, “The Measurement of Meaning,” Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
  28. Pinkava, V., 1976, “Fuzzification” of binary and finite multivalued calculi, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 8, 717–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Willmott, R., 1978, Two fuzzier implication operators in the theory of fuzzy power sets. Report No. FRP-2, Dept. of Maths., Univ. of Essex, Colchester, to appear in Fuzzy Sets and Sys. Google Scholar
  30. Willmott, R., 1979a, On the transitivity of implication and equivalence in some many-valued logics. Report No. FRP-5, Dept. of Maths., Univ. of Essex, Colchester.Google Scholar
  31. Willmott, R., 1979b, Mean measures in fuzzy power-set theory, Report No. FRP-6, Dept. of Maths., Univ. of Essex, Colchester.Google Scholar
  32. Zadeh, L. A., 1965, Fuzzy sets., Inform, and Control, 8, 338–353.Google Scholar
  33. Zadeh, L. A., 1971, Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings, Inform. Sci., 3, 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zadeh, L. A., 1977a, Theory of fuzzy sets, in: “Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology,” J. Beizer, A. Holzman, and A. Kent, eds.Google Scholar
  35. Zadeh, L. A., 1977b, Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 1978, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wyllis Bandler
    • 1
  • Ladislav J. Kohout
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of EssexColchesterEngland
  2. 2.Department of Computer SciencesBrunel UniversityUxbridge, MiddlesexEngland

Personalised recommendations