The Perspective of Waste Isolation Research Issues and Assessment of Consequences for Radionuclide Release

  • T. O. Hunter
Part of the Advances in Nuclear Science & Technology book series (ANST)


Nuclear waste management has recently experienced a proliferation of technical and social issues which have seemingly confounded the stabilization and implementation of effective policy. Advocates and critics alike have shown an inexhaustable capacity to arouse public and scientific interest in these matters. This paper is restricted to the examination of some current technical issues in the perspective of their role in determining consequences of radionuclide release to the biosphere. The consequence assessments done for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site are used as a reference and compared with some current data on various technical issues. The comparisons and conclusions drawn apply specifically to WIPP configurations at the WIPP site. In addition, these initial assessments provide the basis for a method to identify key issues and eliminate inconsequential ones, thereby allowing commensurate allocation of research and development resources.


Consequence Assessment Waste Form Borehole Diameter Nuclear Waste Management Radionuclide Migration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    F. W. Bingham and G. W. Barr, Scenarios for Long Term Release of Radionuclides from a Nuclear Waste Repository in the Los Medanos Region of New Mexico, SAND78–1730, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (1979).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    DOE/EIS-0026-D, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, 1–2, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC (1979).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. H. Westsik, Jr., and R. P. Turcotte, Hydrothermal Reactions of Nuclear Waste Solids-A Preliminary Study, PNL-2759, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. W. Braithwaite and M. A. Molecke, Nuclear Waste Canister Corrosion Studies Pertinent to Geologic Isolation, SAND79–1935J, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (1979).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. J. Lambert and H. C. Shefelbine, A Strategy for Investigation of Fluid Migration inEvaporites (Waste Isolation Pilot Plant-WIPP), SAND79–1889, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (under review).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. J. Hohlfelder, Salt Block II, Preliminary Results, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (in preparation).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. G. Dosch, Interaction of Radionuclides with Geomedia Associated with the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Site in NM, SAND78–0297, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Summary of Research and Development Activities in Support of Waste Acceptance Criteria for WIPP, ch.-Immobilization, SAND791305 (1979).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. L. Christensen and T. O. Hunter, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), Borehole Plugging Program Description, SAND79–0640, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. O. Hunter
    • 1
  1. 1.Sandia LaboratoriesAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations