The Reaction of Hydrogen and Oxygen in the Presence of Concretes Incorporating Simulated Radioactive Waste

Part of the Advances in Nuclear Science & Technology book series (ANST)


The radiolysis of contained water, with the potential of pressurization due to the accumulation of the radiolytically produced gases, has been identified as a major concern for radioactive wastes fixed in cementitious matrices (1). One estimate (1) of the pressure buildup is that about 100 atm could accumulate in a standard canister containing alpha waste after 100,000 years. However, even for this pressure, the rate of gas production would be sma~l. For example, a standard 200-liter canister containing 10 g of 23 Pu dispersed in concrete containing normal concentrations of unbound water would generate a maximum of about 1 ml of H2 per day. Since the radiolysis of concrete is dependent on the amount of unbound or free water present in the system, removal of all or most of this water would greatly reduce this rate (2). Regardless of the production rate, however, pressurization from the accumulation of hydrogen and oxygen would be avoided if there were sufficient recombination of these gases during or after their generation. These studies were undertaken to determine the recombination rates obtained with special cementitious matrices.


Radioactive Waste Water Yield Ferric Oxide Nuclear Waste Management Cementitious Matrice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    N. E. Bibler, SRL DP-1464, Jan. (1978).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. E. Bibler, Savannah River Laboratory, personal communication, Sept. (1979).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. G. Moore, E. Newman and G. C. Rogers, ORNL/TM-6573, March (1979).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. H. Emmett, ed., Catalysis - Fundamental Principles (Part 1), Vol. I (Reinhold Publishing Co., 160, 1954 ).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. C. L. Thorne and E. R. Roberts, Fritz Ephraim Inorganic Chemistry, (Interscience Publishers, Inc., 401–406, 1948 ).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Ponec, Z. Knor and S. Cérnÿ, “Chemisorption and Interaction of Hydrogen and Oxygen on Transition Metals,” Proceeding of the Third International Congress on Catalysis (W. M. H. Sachtler, G. C. A. Schuit and P. Zwietering,,eds; North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 363, 1965 ).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. Hlavâcek and J. Votruba, “Hysteresis and Periodic Activity Behavior in Catalytic Chemical. Reaction Systems,” Adv. Catal. 27, 59 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Katz
    • 1
  1. 1.Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations